FANG vs. TTE: Diamondback Energy vs. TotalEnergies Stock Comparison
How do Diamondback Energy (FANG) and TotalEnergies (TTE) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Diamondback Energy (FANG) and TotalEnergies (TTE) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though FANG is classified under Oil & Gas Exploration & Production while TTE falls under Integrated Oil & Gas.
| Profile Item | FANG | TTE |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Diamondback Energy Inc. | TotalEnergies SE |
| Country/Region | United States | France |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Integrated Oil & Gas |
| Market Capitalization | 49.96 billion USD | 192.81 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | Nasdaq | NYSE |
| Listing Date | October 12, 2012 | October 25, 1991 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | FANG | TTE |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 26.99% | 47.13% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 8.52% | 16.28% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 14.17% | 17.77% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | FANG | TTE |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 33.77% | 25.22% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.53 | 0.15 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -42.10% | -26.16% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.38M | 1.80M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | FANG | TTE |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.67 | 1.70 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.97 | 2.52 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 4.86% and TotalEnergies (TTE) at 17.83% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
FANG
Energy industry group
4.86%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- FANG
- 4.86%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
TTE
Energy industry group
17.83%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- TTE
- 17.83%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 11.62% and TotalEnergies (TTE) at 10.46% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
FANG
Energy industry group
11.62%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- FANG
- 11.62%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
TTE
Energy industry group
10.46%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- TTE
- 10.46%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 44.95% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of TotalEnergies (TTE) at 24.51%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
FANG
Energy industry group
44.95%
- Max
- 71.31%
- FANG
- 44.95%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
TTE
Energy industry group
24.51%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- TTE
- 24.51%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | FANG | TTE |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 4.86% | 17.83% |
| ROA (TTM) | 2.07% | 7.19% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 11.62% | 10.46% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 44.95% | 24.51% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 73.62% | 39.18% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 35.44% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while TotalEnergies (TTE) at -6.78% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in revenue momentum.
EPS Growth
TotalEnergies (TTE) at -13.60% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at -63.10% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | FANG | TTE |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 35.44% | -6.78% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 15.99% | -11.53% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -63.10% | -13.60% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -38.48% | -9.70% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
TotalEnergies (TTE) at 1.11 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 0.55 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for FANG.
FANG
Energy industry group
0.55
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- FANG
- 0.55
- Min
- 0.24
TTE
Energy industry group
1.11
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- TTE
- 1.11
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 0.29 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while TotalEnergies (TTE) at 0.46 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.
FANG
Energy industry group
0.29
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- FANG
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
TTE
Energy industry group
0.46
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- TTE
- 0.46
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | FANG | TTE |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 0.55 | 1.11 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.29 | 0.46 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.99 | 0.52 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
TotalEnergies (TTE) at 4.58% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 2.47% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, TTE the richer one.
FANG
Energy industry group
2.47%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- FANG
- 2.47%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
TTE
Energy industry group
4.58%
- Max
- 8.57%
- TTE
- 4.58%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
TotalEnergies (TTE) at 39.93% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 57.20% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
FANG
Energy industry group
57.20%
- Max
- 133.24%
- FANG
- 57.20%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
TTE
Energy industry group
39.93%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- TTE
- 39.93%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | FANG | TTE |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.47% | 4.58% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 57.20% | 39.93% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
TotalEnergies (TTE) at 8.76 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 24.09 sits in the richer quartile — FANG needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.
FANG
Energy industry group
24.09
- Max
- 39.54
- FANG
- 24.09
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
TTE
Energy industry group
8.76
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- TTE
- 8.76
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 2.83 and TotalEnergies (TTE) at 0.90 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
FANG
Energy industry group
2.83
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- FANG
- 2.83
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
TTE
Energy industry group
0.90
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- TTE
- 0.90
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 1.28 and TotalEnergies (TTE) at 1.46 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
FANG
Energy industry group
1.28
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- FANG
- 1.28
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
TTE
Energy industry group
1.46
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- TTE
- 1.46
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | FANG | TTE |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 24.09 | 8.76 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 2.83 | 0.90 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.28 | 1.46 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 12.09% | 7.25% |