Seek Returns

FANG vs. TRP: Diamondback Energy vs. TC Energy Stock Comparison

How do Diamondback Energy (FANG) and TC Energy (TRP) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Diamondback Energy (FANG) and TC Energy (TRP) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though FANG is classified under Oil & Gas Exploration & Production while TRP falls under Oil & Gas Storage & Transportation.

Company profile comparison for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and TC Energy (TRP)
Profile ItemFANGTRP
NameDiamondback Energy Inc.TC Energy Corporation
Country/RegionUnited StatesCanada
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS Industry GroupEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryOil, Gas & Consumable FuelsOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
GICS Sub-IndustryOil & Gas Exploration & ProductionOil & Gas Storage & Transportation
Market Capitalization49.96 billion USD64.51 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNasdaqNYSE
Listing DateOctober 12, 2012September 20, 1982
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

FANG
TRP
GSPC
Loading price history…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. TC Energy (TRP), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and TC Energy (TRP). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and TC Energy (TRP). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and TC Energy (TRP)
MetricFANGTRP
Total Return (1Y)26.99%24.67%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)8.52%26.02%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)14.17%9.85%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

FANG
TRP
GSPC
Loading price history…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. TC Energy (TRP), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and TC Energy (TRP). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and TC Energy (TRP)
MetricFANGTRP
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)33.77%19.39%
Beta (5Y)0.530.64
Max Drawdown (5Y)-42.10%-38.98%
Avg. Volume (3M)2.38M2.56M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
FANG and TRP are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and TC Energy (TRP)
MetricFANGTRP
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)0.671.05
Sortino Ratio (1Y)0.971.61

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 4.86% and TC Energy (TRP) at 12.15% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

FANG

Energy industry group

4.86%

Max
53.85%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
FANG
4.86%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%

TRP

Energy industry group

12.15%

Max
53.85%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
TRP
12.15%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. TC Energy (TRP): A comparison of their ROE against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

TC Energy (TRP) at 25.05% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 11.62%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

FANG

Energy industry group

11.62%

Max
56.92%
Q3
22.92%
FANG
11.62%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%

TRP

Energy industry group

25.05%

Max
56.92%
TRP
25.05%
Q3
22.92%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. TC Energy (TRP): A comparison of their net margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 44.95% and TC Energy (TRP) at 41.66% convert sales into operating profit at a top-quartile rate, pointing to tighter cost discipline before financing and tax.

FANG

Energy industry group

44.95%

Max
71.31%
FANG
44.95%
Q3
33.75%
Median
18.73%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%

TRP

Energy industry group

41.66%

Max
71.31%
TRP
41.66%
Q3
33.75%
Median
18.73%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. TC Energy (TRP): A comparison of their operating margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and TC Energy (TRP)
MetricFANGTRP
ROE (TTM)4.86%12.15%
ROA (TTM)2.07%3.70%
Net Margin (TTM)11.62%25.05%
Operating Margin (TTM)44.95%41.66%
Gross Margin (TTM)73.62%70.07%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 35.44% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while TC Energy (TRP) at 10.66% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for FANG.

Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. TC Energy (TRP): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

TC Energy (TRP) at -26.19% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at -63.10% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.

Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. TC Energy (TRP): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and TC Energy (TRP)
MetricFANGTRP
Revenue Growth (YoY)35.44%10.66%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)15.99%7.38%
EPS Growth (YoY)-63.10%-26.19%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)-38.48%72.24%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 0.55 and TC Energy (TRP) at 0.57 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.

FANG

Energy industry group

0.55

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
FANG
0.55
Min
0.24

TRP

Energy industry group

0.57

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
TRP
0.57
Min
0.24
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. TC Energy (TRP): A comparison of their current ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 0.29 keeps leverage in the lower quartile, while TC Energy (TRP) at 1.68 sits in the higher-leverage quartile.

FANG

Energy industry group

0.29

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
Q1
0.30
FANG
0.29
Min
0.00

TRP

Energy industry group

1.68

Max
1.75
TRP
1.68
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. TC Energy (TRP): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and TC Energy (TRP)
MetricFANGTRP
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.550.57
Debt / Equity (MRQ)0.291.68
Net Debt / EBITDA0.996.08

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

TC Energy (TRP) at 5.57% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 2.47% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, TRP the richer one.

FANG

Energy industry group

2.47%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
FANG
2.47%
Median
1.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TRP

Energy industry group

5.57%

Max
8.57%
TRP
5.57%
Q3
3.58%
Median
1.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. TC Energy (TRP): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 57.20% and TC Energy (TRP) at 93.87% pay out an above-typical share of earnings for their industries, leaving thinner cover if profits dip.

FANG

Energy industry group

57.20%

Max
133.24%
FANG
57.20%
Q3
53.31%
Median
25.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

TRP

Energy industry group

93.87%

Max
133.24%
TRP
93.87%
Q3
53.31%
Median
25.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. TC Energy (TRP): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and TC Energy (TRP)
MetricFANGTRP
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.47%5.57%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)57.20%93.87%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 24.09 and TC Energy (TRP) at 23.19 sit in the richer earnings-multiple quartile for P/E ratio, so investors are paying more for TTM earnings than they pay for typical peers.

FANG

Energy industry group

24.09

Max
39.54
FANG
24.09
Q3
21.72
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99

TRP

Energy industry group

23.19

Max
39.54
TRP
23.19
Q3
21.72
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. TC Energy (TRP): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 2.83 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while TC Energy (TRP) at 4.03 sits in the pricier quartile — TRP costs more per dollar of sales.

FANG

Energy industry group

2.83

Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
FANG
2.83
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00

TRP

Energy industry group

4.03

Max
5.40
TRP
4.03
Q3
2.85
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. TC Energy (TRP): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 1.28 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while TC Energy (TRP) at 3.54 carries an above-peer premium to book — TRP is pricier on assets.

FANG

Energy industry group

1.28

Max
4.21
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
FANG
1.28
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01

TRP

Energy industry group

3.54

Max
4.21
TRP
3.54
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. TC Energy (TRP): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and TC Energy (TRP)
MetricFANGTRP
P/E Ratio (TTM)24.0923.19
P/S Ratio (TTM)2.834.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)1.283.54
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)12.09%0.77%