FANG vs. SLB: Diamondback Energy vs. SLB Stock Comparison

November 11, 2026

How do Diamondback Energy (FANG) and SLB (SLB) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Diamondback Energy (FANG) and SLB (SLB) both fall under the Energy industry group, but FANG is classified in Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels while SLB is classified in Energy Equipment & Services.

Company profile comparison for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and SLB (SLB)
Profile Item	FANG	SLB
Name	Diamondback Energy Inc.	SLB N.V.
Country/Region	United States	United States
GICS Sector	Energy	Energy
GICS Industry Group	Energy	Energy
GICS Industry	Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels	Energy Equipment & Services
GICS Sub-Industry	Oil & Gas Exploration & Production	Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
Market Capitalization	49.96 billion USD	73.68 billion USD
Currency	USD	USD
Exchange	Nasdaq	NYSE
Listing Date	October 12, 2012	December 31, 1981
Security Type	Common Stock	Common Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

FANG

SLB

GSPC

Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. SLB (SLB), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…

Trailing total returns for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and SLB (SLB). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…

Calendar-year total returns for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and SLB (SLB). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and SLB (SLB)
Metric	FANG	SLB
Total Return (1Y)	26.99%	41.53%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)	8.52%	1.23%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)	14.17%	10.62%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

FANG

SLB

GSPC

Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. SLB (SLB), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…

Distribution of monthly total returns for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and SLB (SLB). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and SLB (SLB)
Metric	FANG	SLB
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)	33.77%	37.07%
Beta (5Y)	0.53	0.80
Max Drawdown (5Y)	-42.10%	-46.63%
Avg. Volume (3M)	2.38M	12.57M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

FANG and SLB are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and SLB (SLB)
Metric	FANG	SLB
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)	0.67	1.00
Sortino Ratio (1Y)	0.97	1.59

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 4.86% and SLB (SLB) at 11.66% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

FANG

Energy industry group

4.86%

Max: 53.85%
Q3: 24.79%
Median: 12.85%
FANG: 4.86%
Q1: 2.03%
Min: -29.09%

SLB

Energy industry group

11.66%

Max: 53.85%
Q3: 24.79%
Median: 12.85%
SLB: 11.66%
Q1: 2.03%
Min: -29.09%

Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. SLB (SLB): A comparison of their ROE against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 11.62% and SLB (SLB) at 8.40% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

FANG

Energy industry group

11.62%

Max: 56.92%
Q3: 22.92%
FANG: 11.62%
Median: 10.10%
Q1: 0.07%
Min: -27.38%

SLB

Energy industry group

8.40%

Max: 56.92%
Q3: 22.92%
Median: 10.10%
SLB: 8.40%
Q1: 0.07%
Min: -27.38%

Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. SLB (SLB): A comparison of their net margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 44.95% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of SLB (SLB) at 14.03%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

FANG

Energy industry group

44.95%

Max: 71.31%
FANG: 44.95%
Q3: 33.75%
Median: 18.73%
Q1: 6.94%
Min: -24.52%

SLB

Energy industry group

14.03%

Max: 71.31%
Q3: 33.75%
Median: 18.73%
SLB: 14.03%
Q1: 6.94%
Min: -24.52%

Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. SLB (SLB): A comparison of their operating margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and SLB (SLB)
Metric	FANG	SLB
ROE (TTM)	4.86%	11.66%
ROA (TTM)	2.07%	5.72%
Net Margin (TTM)	11.62%	8.40%
Operating Margin (TTM)	44.95%	14.03%
Gross Margin (TTM)	73.62%	16.59%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 35.44% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while SLB (SLB) at -1.60% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for FANG.

Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. SLB (SLB): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

SLB (SLB) at -24.44% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at -63.10% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.

Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. SLB (SLB): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and SLB (SLB)
Metric	FANG	SLB
Revenue Growth (YoY)	35.44%	-1.60%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)	15.99%	8.33%
EPS Growth (YoY)	-63.10%	-24.44%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)	-38.48%	-0.56%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

SLB (SLB) at 1.39 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 0.55 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for FANG.

FANG

Energy industry group

0.55

Max: 3.64
Q3: 2.21
Median: 1.41
Q1: 0.88
FANG: 0.55
Min: 0.24

SLB

Energy industry group

1.39

Max: 3.64
Q3: 2.21
Median: 1.41
SLB: 1.39
Q1: 0.88
Min: 0.24

Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. SLB (SLB): A comparison of their current ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 0.29 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while SLB (SLB) at 0.47 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.

FANG

Energy industry group

0.29

Max: 1.75
Q3: 0.93
Median: 0.54
Q1: 0.30
FANG: 0.29
Min: 0.00

SLB

Energy industry group

0.47

Max: 1.75
Q3: 0.93
Median: 0.54
SLB: 0.47
Q1: 0.30
Min: 0.00

Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. SLB (SLB): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and SLB (SLB)
Metric	FANG	SLB
Current Ratio (MRQ)	0.55	1.39
Debt / Equity (MRQ)	0.29	0.47
Net Debt / EBITDA	0.99	1.25

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 2.47% and SLB (SLB) at 2.36% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

FANG

Energy industry group

2.47%

Max: 8.57%
Q3: 3.58%
FANG: 2.47%
Median: 1.71%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

SLB

Energy industry group

2.36%

Max: 8.57%
Q3: 3.58%
SLB: 2.36%
Median: 1.71%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. SLB (SLB): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 57.20% and SLB (SLB) at 56.80% pay out an above-typical share of earnings for their industries, leaving thinner cover if profits dip.

FANG

Energy industry group

57.20%

Max: 133.24%
FANG: 57.20%
Q3: 53.31%
Median: 25.24%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

SLB

Energy industry group

56.80%

Max: 133.24%
SLB: 56.80%
Q3: 53.31%
Median: 25.24%
Q1: 0.00%
Min: 0.00%

Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. SLB (SLB): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and SLB (SLB)
Metric	FANG	SLB
Dividend Yield (TTM)	2.47%	2.36%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)	57.20%	56.80%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 24.09 and SLB (SLB) at 24.23 sit in the richer earnings-multiple quartile for P/E ratio, so investors are paying more for TTM earnings than they pay for typical peers.

FANG

Energy industry group

24.09

Max: 39.54
FANG: 24.09
Q3: 21.72
Median: 12.19
Q1: 7.71
Min: 2.99

SLB

Energy industry group

24.23

Max: 39.54
SLB: 24.23
Q3: 21.72
Median: 12.19
Q1: 7.71
Min: 2.99

Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. SLB (SLB): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

On P/S ratio, both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 2.83 and SLB (SLB) at 2.00 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.

FANG

Energy industry group

2.83

Max: 5.40
Q3: 2.85
FANG: 2.83
Median: 1.69
Q1: 0.88
Min: 0.00

SLB

Energy industry group

2.00

Max: 5.40
Q3: 2.85
SLB: 2.00
Median: 1.69
Q1: 0.88
Min: 0.00

Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. SLB (SLB): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 1.28 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while SLB (SLB) at 2.83 carries an above-peer premium to book — SLB is pricier on assets.

FANG

Energy industry group

1.28

Max: 4.21
Q3: 2.38
Median: 1.51
FANG: 1.28
Q1: 1.08
Min: 0.01

SLB

Energy industry group

2.83

Max: 4.21
SLB: 2.83
Q3: 2.38
Median: 1.51
Q1: 1.08
Min: 0.01

Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. SLB (SLB): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and SLB (SLB)
Metric	FANG	SLB
P/E Ratio (TTM)	24.09	24.23
P/S Ratio (TTM)	2.83	2.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)	1.28	2.83
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)	12.09%	4.18%