Seek Returns

FANG vs. PR: Diamondback Energy vs. Permian Resources Stock Comparison

How do Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Permian Resources (PR) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Permian Resources (PR) are both classified in the Oil & Gas Exploration & Production sub-industry within the broader Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Company profile comparison for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Permian Resources (PR)
Profile ItemFANGPR
NameDiamondback Energy Inc.Permian Resources Corp Class A Common Stock
Country/RegionUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS Industry GroupEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryOil, Gas & Consumable FuelsOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
GICS Sub-IndustryOil & Gas Exploration & ProductionOil & Gas Exploration & Production
Market Capitalization49.96 billion USD18.24 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNasdaqNYSE
Listing DateOctober 12, 2012April 15, 2016
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

FANG
PR
GSPC
Loading price history…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Permian Resources (PR), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Permian Resources (PR). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Permian Resources (PR). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Permian Resources (PR)
MetricFANGPR
Total Return (1Y)26.99%69.18%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)8.52%23.63%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)14.17%26.41%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

FANG
PR
GSPC
Loading price history…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Permian Resources (PR), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Permian Resources (PR). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Permian Resources (PR)
MetricFANGPR
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)33.77%34.59%
Beta (5Y)0.530.65
Max Drawdown (5Y)-42.10%-44.31%
Avg. Volume (3M)2.38M9.78M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
FANG and PR are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Permian Resources (PR)
MetricFANGPR
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)0.671.88
Sortino Ratio (1Y)0.972.73

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 4.86% and Permian Resources (PR) at 13.95% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

FANG

Energy industry group

4.86%

Max
53.85%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
FANG
4.86%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%

PR

Energy industry group

13.95%

Max
53.85%
Q3
24.79%
PR
13.95%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Permian Resources (PR): A comparison of their ROE against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Permian Resources (PR) at 25.04% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 11.62%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

FANG

Energy industry group

11.62%

Max
56.92%
Q3
22.92%
FANG
11.62%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%

PR

Energy industry group

25.04%

Max
56.92%
PR
25.04%
Q3
22.92%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Permian Resources (PR): A comparison of their net margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 44.95% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Permian Resources (PR) at 29.59%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

FANG

Energy industry group

44.95%

Max
71.31%
FANG
44.95%
Q3
33.75%
Median
18.73%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%

PR

Energy industry group

29.59%

Max
71.31%
Q3
33.75%
PR
29.59%
Median
18.73%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Permian Resources (PR): A comparison of their operating margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Permian Resources (PR)
MetricFANGPR
ROE (TTM)4.86%13.95%
ROA (TTM)2.07%7.73%
Net Margin (TTM)11.62%25.04%
Operating Margin (TTM)44.95%29.59%
Gross Margin (TTM)73.62%77.14%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 35.44% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Permian Resources (PR) at 1.29% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for FANG.

Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Permian Resources (PR): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Permian Resources (PR) at -11.72% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at -63.10% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.

Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Permian Resources (PR): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Permian Resources (PR)
MetricFANGPR
Revenue Growth (YoY)35.44%1.29%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)15.99%33.45%
EPS Growth (YoY)-63.10%-11.72%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)-38.48%-7.36%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 0.55 and Permian Resources (PR) at 0.50 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.

FANG

Energy industry group

0.55

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
FANG
0.55
Min
0.24

PR

Energy industry group

0.50

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
PR
0.50
Min
0.24
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Permian Resources (PR): A comparison of their current ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 0.29 and Permian Resources (PR) at 0.26 keep leverage in the lower quartile of their industries, with less balance-sheet debt relative to equity than most peers.

FANG

Energy industry group

0.29

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
Q1
0.30
FANG
0.29
Min
0.00

PR

Energy industry group

0.26

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
Q1
0.30
PR
0.26
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Permian Resources (PR): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Permian Resources (PR)
MetricFANGPR
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.550.50
Debt / Equity (MRQ)0.290.26
Net Debt / EBITDA0.990.71

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 2.47% and Permian Resources (PR) at 2.95% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

FANG

Energy industry group

2.47%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
FANG
2.47%
Median
1.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PR

Energy industry group

2.95%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
PR
2.95%
Median
1.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Permian Resources (PR): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Permian Resources (PR) at 32.64% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 57.20% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

FANG

Energy industry group

57.20%

Max
133.24%
FANG
57.20%
Q3
53.31%
Median
25.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PR

Energy industry group

32.64%

Max
133.24%
Q3
53.31%
PR
32.64%
Median
25.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Permian Resources (PR): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Permian Resources (PR)
MetricFANGPR
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.47%2.95%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)57.20%32.64%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Permian Resources (PR) at 11.27 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 24.09 sits in the richer quartile — FANG needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

FANG

Energy industry group

24.09

Max
39.54
FANG
24.09
Q3
21.72
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99

PR

Energy industry group

11.27

Max
39.54
Q3
21.72
Median
12.19
PR
11.27
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Permian Resources (PR): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 2.83 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Permian Resources (PR) at 2.86 sits in the pricier quartile — PR costs more per dollar of sales.

FANG

Energy industry group

2.83

Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
FANG
2.83
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00

PR

Energy industry group

2.86

Max
5.40
PR
2.86
Q3
2.85
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Permian Resources (PR): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

On P/B ratio, both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 1.28 and Permian Resources (PR) at 1.48 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

FANG

Energy industry group

1.28

Max
4.21
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
FANG
1.28
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01

PR

Energy industry group

1.48

Max
4.21
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
PR
1.48
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Permian Resources (PR): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Permian Resources (PR)
MetricFANGPR
P/E Ratio (TTM)24.0911.27
P/S Ratio (TTM)2.832.86
P/B Ratio (MRQ)1.281.48
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)12.09%2.10%