Seek Returns

FANG vs. PBA: Diamondback Energy vs. Pembina Pipeline Stock Comparison

How do Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Pembina Pipeline (PBA) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Pembina Pipeline (PBA) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though FANG is classified under Oil & Gas Exploration & Production while PBA falls under Oil & Gas Storage & Transportation.

Company profile comparison for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Pembina Pipeline (PBA)
Profile ItemFANGPBA
NameDiamondback Energy Inc.Pembina Pipeline Corp.
Country/RegionUnited StatesCanada
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS Industry GroupEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryOil, Gas & Consumable FuelsOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
GICS Sub-IndustryOil & Gas Exploration & ProductionOil & Gas Storage & Transportation
Market Capitalization49.96 billion USD28.08 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNasdaqNYSE
Listing DateOctober 12, 2012October 6, 2010
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

FANG
PBA
GSPC
Loading price history…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Pembina Pipeline (PBA), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Pembina Pipeline (PBA). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Pembina Pipeline (PBA). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Pembina Pipeline (PBA)
MetricFANGPBA
Total Return (1Y)26.99%35.84%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)8.52%20.26%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)14.17%12.46%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

FANG
PBA
GSPC
Loading price history…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Pembina Pipeline (PBA), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Pembina Pipeline (PBA). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Pembina Pipeline (PBA)
MetricFANGPBA
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)33.77%20.43%
Beta (5Y)0.530.59
Max Drawdown (5Y)-42.10%-27.37%
Avg. Volume (3M)2.38M993.87K

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
FANG and PBA are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Pembina Pipeline (PBA)
MetricFANGPBA
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)0.671.54
Sortino Ratio (1Y)0.972.32

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 4.86% and Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 12.10% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

FANG

Energy industry group

4.86%

Max
53.85%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
FANG
4.86%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%

PBA

Energy industry group

12.10%

Max
53.85%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
PBA
12.10%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Pembina Pipeline (PBA): A comparison of their ROE against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 24.78% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 11.62%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

FANG

Energy industry group

11.62%

Max
56.92%
Q3
22.92%
FANG
11.62%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%

PBA

Energy industry group

24.78%

Max
56.92%
PBA
24.78%
Q3
22.92%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Pembina Pipeline (PBA): A comparison of their net margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 44.95% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 32.63%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

FANG

Energy industry group

44.95%

Max
71.31%
FANG
44.95%
Q3
33.75%
Median
18.73%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%

PBA

Energy industry group

32.63%

Max
71.31%
Q3
33.75%
PBA
32.63%
Median
18.73%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Pembina Pipeline (PBA): A comparison of their operating margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Pembina Pipeline (PBA)
MetricFANGPBA
ROE (TTM)4.86%12.10%
ROA (TTM)2.07%4.65%
Net Margin (TTM)11.62%24.78%
Operating Margin (TTM)44.95%32.63%
Gross Margin (TTM)73.62%38.23%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 35.44% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 5.34% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for FANG.

Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Pembina Pipeline (PBA): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at -11.33% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at -63.10% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.

Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Pembina Pipeline (PBA): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Pembina Pipeline (PBA)
MetricFANGPBA
Revenue Growth (YoY)35.44%5.34%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)15.99%-12.50%
EPS Growth (YoY)-63.10%-11.33%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)-38.48%-19.61%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 0.55 and Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 0.75 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.

FANG

Energy industry group

0.55

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
FANG
0.55
Min
0.24

PBA

Energy industry group

0.75

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
PBA
0.75
Min
0.24
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Pembina Pipeline (PBA): A comparison of their current ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 0.29 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 0.80 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.

FANG

Energy industry group

0.29

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
Q1
0.30
FANG
0.29
Min
0.00

PBA

Energy industry group

0.80

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
PBA
0.80
Median
0.54
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Pembina Pipeline (PBA): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Pembina Pipeline (PBA)
MetricFANGPBA
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.550.75
Debt / Equity (MRQ)0.290.80
Net Debt / EBITDA0.993.74

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 6.13% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 2.47% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, PBA the richer one.

FANG

Energy industry group

2.47%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
FANG
2.47%
Median
1.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PBA

Energy industry group

6.13%

Max
8.57%
PBA
6.13%
Q3
3.58%
Median
1.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Pembina Pipeline (PBA): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 57.20% and Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 86.79% pay out an above-typical share of earnings for their industries, leaving thinner cover if profits dip.

FANG

Energy industry group

57.20%

Max
133.24%
FANG
57.20%
Q3
53.31%
Median
25.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

PBA

Energy industry group

86.79%

Max
133.24%
PBA
86.79%
Q3
53.31%
Median
25.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Pembina Pipeline (PBA): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Pembina Pipeline (PBA)
MetricFANGPBA
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.47%6.13%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)57.20%86.79%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 20.12 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 24.09 sits in the richer quartile — FANG needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

FANG

Energy industry group

24.09

Max
39.54
FANG
24.09
Q3
21.72
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99

PBA

Energy industry group

20.12

Max
39.54
Q3
21.72
PBA
20.12
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Pembina Pipeline (PBA): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 2.83 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 3.36 sits in the pricier quartile — PBA costs more per dollar of sales.

FANG

Energy industry group

2.83

Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
FANG
2.83
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00

PBA

Energy industry group

3.36

Max
5.40
PBA
3.36
Q3
2.85
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Pembina Pipeline (PBA): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 1.28 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Pembina Pipeline (PBA) at 2.55 carries an above-peer premium to book — PBA is pricier on assets.

FANG

Energy industry group

1.28

Max
4.21
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
FANG
1.28
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01

PBA

Energy industry group

2.55

Max
4.21
PBA
2.55
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Pembina Pipeline (PBA): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Pembina Pipeline (PBA)
MetricFANGPBA
P/E Ratio (TTM)24.0920.12
P/S Ratio (TTM)2.833.36
P/B Ratio (MRQ)1.282.55
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)12.09%5.53%