FANG vs. LNG: Diamondback Energy vs. Cheniere Energy Stock Comparison
How do Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Cheniere Energy (LNG) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Cheniere Energy (LNG) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though FANG is classified under Oil & Gas Exploration & Production while LNG falls under Oil & Gas Storage & Transportation.
| Profile Item | FANG | LNG |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Diamondback Energy Inc. | Cheniere Energy Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Storage & Transportation |
| Market Capitalization | 49.96 billion USD | 56.76 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | Nasdaq | NYSE |
| Listing Date | October 12, 2012 | April 4, 1994 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | FANG | LNG |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 26.99% | 36.89% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 8.52% | 19.36% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 14.17% | 22.59% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | FANG | LNG |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 33.77% | 31.41% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.53 | 0.06 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -42.10% | -24.87% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.38M | 2.00M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | FANG | LNG |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.67 | 1.04 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.97 | 1.54 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 39.68% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 4.86% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for LNG.
FANG
Energy industry group
4.86%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- FANG
- 4.86%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
LNG
Energy industry group
39.68%
- Max
- 53.85%
- LNG
- 39.68%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 11.62% and Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 13.40% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
FANG
Energy industry group
11.62%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- FANG
- 11.62%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
LNG
Energy industry group
13.40%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- LNG
- 13.40%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 44.95% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 30.82%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
FANG
Energy industry group
44.95%
- Max
- 71.31%
- FANG
- 44.95%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
LNG
Energy industry group
30.82%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- LNG
- 30.82%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | FANG | LNG |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 4.86% | 39.68% |
| ROA (TTM) | 2.07% | 8.61% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 11.62% | 13.40% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 44.95% | 30.82% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 73.62% | 34.89% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 35.44% and Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 27.21% sit in the top peer quartile for revenue growth, so each is growing its top line faster than typical industry peers.
EPS Growth
Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 69.93% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at -63.10% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in earnings momentum.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | FANG | LNG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 35.44% | 27.21% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 15.99% | -15.77% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -63.10% | 69.93% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -38.48% | 62.34% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 0.90 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 0.55 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for FANG.
FANG
Energy industry group
0.55
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- FANG
- 0.55
- Min
- 0.24
LNG
Energy industry group
0.90
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- LNG
- 0.90
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 0.29 keeps leverage in the lower quartile, while Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 2.31 is above its industry debt-to-equity ratio range.
FANG
Energy industry group
0.29
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- FANG
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
LNG
Energy industry group
2.31
- LNG
- 2.31
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | FANG | LNG |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 0.55 | 0.90 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.29 | 2.31 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.99 | 3.26 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 2.47% and Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 0.82% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
FANG
Energy industry group
2.47%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- FANG
- 2.47%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
LNG
Energy industry group
0.82%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 1.71%
- LNG
- 0.82%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 15.80% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 57.20% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
FANG
Energy industry group
57.20%
- Max
- 133.24%
- FANG
- 57.20%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
LNG
Energy industry group
15.80%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- LNG
- 15.80%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | FANG | LNG |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.47% | 0.82% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 57.20% | 15.80% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 19.78 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 24.09 sits in the richer quartile — FANG needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.
FANG
Energy industry group
24.09
- Max
- 39.54
- FANG
- 24.09
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
LNG
Energy industry group
19.78
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- LNG
- 19.78
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 2.83 and Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 2.50 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
FANG
Energy industry group
2.83
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- FANG
- 2.83
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
LNG
Energy industry group
2.50
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- LNG
- 2.50
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 1.28 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 8.70 prices above its benchmark range — LNG looks rich relative to book.
FANG
Energy industry group
1.28
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- FANG
- 1.28
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
LNG
Energy industry group
8.70
- LNG
- 8.70
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | FANG | LNG |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 24.09 | 19.78 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 2.83 | 2.50 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.28 | 8.70 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 12.09% | 3.17% |