Seek Returns

FANG vs. FTI: Diamondback Energy vs. TechnipFMC Stock Comparison

How do Diamondback Energy (FANG) and TechnipFMC (FTI) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Diamondback Energy (FANG) and TechnipFMC (FTI) both fall under the Energy industry group, but FANG is classified in Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels while FTI is classified in Energy Equipment & Services.

Company profile comparison for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and TechnipFMC (FTI)
Profile ItemFANGFTI
NameDiamondback Energy Inc.TechnipFMC plc
Country/RegionUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS Industry GroupEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryOil, Gas & Consumable FuelsEnergy Equipment & Services
GICS Sub-IndustryOil & Gas Exploration & ProductionOil & Gas Equipment & Services
Market Capitalization49.96 billion USD24.70 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNasdaqNYSE
Listing DateOctober 12, 2012June 15, 2001
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

FANG
FTI
GSPC
Loading price history…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. TechnipFMC (FTI), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and TechnipFMC (FTI). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and TechnipFMC (FTI). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and TechnipFMC (FTI)
MetricFANGFTI
Total Return (1Y)26.99%51.75%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)8.52%46.71%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)14.17%54.94%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

FANG
FTI
GSPC
Loading price history…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. TechnipFMC (FTI), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and TechnipFMC (FTI). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and TechnipFMC (FTI)
MetricFANGFTI
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)33.77%32.65%
Beta (5Y)0.530.87
Max Drawdown (5Y)-42.10%-36.71%
Avg. Volume (3M)2.38M2.86M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
FANG and FTI are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and TechnipFMC (FTI)
MetricFANGFTI
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)0.671.45
Sortino Ratio (1Y)0.972.11

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

TechnipFMC (FTI) at 38.30% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 4.86% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for FTI.

FANG

Energy industry group

4.86%

Max
53.85%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
FANG
4.86%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%

FTI

Energy industry group

38.30%

Max
53.85%
FTI
38.30%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. TechnipFMC (FTI): A comparison of their ROE against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 11.62% and TechnipFMC (FTI) at 12.04% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

FANG

Energy industry group

11.62%

Max
56.92%
Q3
22.92%
FANG
11.62%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%

FTI

Energy industry group

12.04%

Max
56.92%
Q3
22.92%
FTI
12.04%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. TechnipFMC (FTI): A comparison of their net margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 44.95% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of TechnipFMC (FTI) at 17.77%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

FANG

Energy industry group

44.95%

Max
71.31%
FANG
44.95%
Q3
33.75%
Median
18.73%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%

FTI

Energy industry group

17.77%

Max
71.31%
Q3
33.75%
Median
18.73%
FTI
17.77%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. TechnipFMC (FTI): A comparison of their operating margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and TechnipFMC (FTI)
MetricFANGFTI
ROE (TTM)4.86%38.30%
ROA (TTM)2.07%10.08%
Net Margin (TTM)11.62%12.04%
Operating Margin (TTM)44.95%17.77%
Gross Margin (TTM)73.62%23.60%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 35.44% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while TechnipFMC (FTI) at 9.35% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for FANG.

Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. TechnipFMC (FTI): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

TechnipFMC (FTI) at 20.42% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at -63.10% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.

Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. TechnipFMC (FTI): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and TechnipFMC (FTI)
MetricFANGFTI
Revenue Growth (YoY)35.44%9.35%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)15.99%14.02%
EPS Growth (YoY)-63.10%20.42%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)-38.48%--

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

TechnipFMC (FTI) at 1.09 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 0.55 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for FANG.

FANG

Energy industry group

0.55

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
FANG
0.55
Min
0.24

FTI

Energy industry group

1.09

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
FTI
1.09
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. TechnipFMC (FTI): A comparison of their current ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 0.29 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while TechnipFMC (FTI) at 0.39 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.

FANG

Energy industry group

0.29

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
Q1
0.30
FANG
0.29
Min
0.00

FTI

Energy industry group

0.39

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
FTI
0.39
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. TechnipFMC (FTI): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and TechnipFMC (FTI)
MetricFANGFTI
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.551.09
Debt / Equity (MRQ)0.290.39
Net Debt / EBITDA0.990.12

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 2.47% and TechnipFMC (FTI) at 0.32% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

FANG

Energy industry group

2.47%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
FANG
2.47%
Median
1.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FTI

Energy industry group

0.32%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
Median
1.71%
FTI
0.32%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. TechnipFMC (FTI): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

TechnipFMC (FTI) at 6.29% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 57.20% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

FANG

Energy industry group

57.20%

Max
133.24%
FANG
57.20%
Q3
53.31%
Median
25.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FTI

Energy industry group

6.29%

Max
133.24%
Q3
53.31%
Median
25.24%
FTI
6.29%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. TechnipFMC (FTI): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and TechnipFMC (FTI)
MetricFANGFTI
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.47%0.32%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)57.20%6.29%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

TechnipFMC (FTI) at 19.97 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 24.09 sits in the richer quartile — FANG needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

FANG

Energy industry group

24.09

Max
39.54
FANG
24.09
Q3
21.72
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99

FTI

Energy industry group

19.97

Max
39.54
Q3
21.72
FTI
19.97
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. TechnipFMC (FTI): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

On P/S ratio, both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 2.83 and TechnipFMC (FTI) at 2.32 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.

FANG

Energy industry group

2.83

Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
FANG
2.83
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00

FTI

Energy industry group

2.32

Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
FTI
2.32
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. TechnipFMC (FTI): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 1.28 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while TechnipFMC (FTI) at 7.44 prices above its benchmark range — FTI looks rich relative to book.

FANG

Energy industry group

1.28

Max
4.21
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
FANG
1.28
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01

FTI

Energy industry group

7.44

FTI
7.44
Max
4.21
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. TechnipFMC (FTI): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and TechnipFMC (FTI)
MetricFANGFTI
P/E Ratio (TTM)24.0919.97
P/S Ratio (TTM)2.832.32
P/B Ratio (MRQ)1.287.44
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)12.09%6.01%