Seek Returns

FANG vs. FRO: Diamondback Energy vs. Frontline Stock Comparison

How do Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Frontline (FRO) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Frontline (FRO) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though FANG is classified under Oil & Gas Exploration & Production while FRO falls under Oil & Gas Storage & Transportation.

Company profile comparison for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Frontline (FRO)
Profile ItemFANGFRO
NameDiamondback Energy Inc.Frontline plc Ordinary Shares
Country/RegionUnited StatesCyprus
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS Industry GroupEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryOil, Gas & Consumable FuelsOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
GICS Sub-IndustryOil & Gas Exploration & ProductionOil & Gas Storage & Transportation
Market Capitalization49.96 billion USD10.11 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNasdaqNYSE
Listing DateOctober 12, 2012August 6, 2001
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

FANG
FRO
GSPC
Loading price history…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Frontline (FRO), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Frontline (FRO). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Frontline (FRO). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Frontline (FRO)
MetricFANGFRO
Total Return (1Y)26.99%119.28%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)8.52%40.57%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)14.17%52.54%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

FANG
FRO
GSPC
Loading price history…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Frontline (FRO), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Frontline (FRO). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Frontline (FRO)
MetricFANGFRO
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)33.77%46.26%
Beta (5Y)0.530.22
Max Drawdown (5Y)-42.10%-52.04%
Avg. Volume (3M)2.38M3.68M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
FANG and FRO are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Frontline (FRO)
MetricFANGFRO
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)0.672.49
Sortino Ratio (1Y)0.973.74

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Frontline (FRO) at 53.85% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 4.86% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for FRO.

FANG

Energy industry group

4.86%

Max
53.85%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
FANG
4.86%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%

FRO

Energy industry group

53.85%

FRO
53.85%
Max
53.85%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Frontline (FRO): A comparison of their ROE against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Frontline (FRO) at 54.76% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 11.62%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

FANG

Energy industry group

11.62%

Max
56.92%
Q3
22.92%
FANG
11.62%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%

FRO

Energy industry group

54.76%

Max
56.92%
FRO
54.76%
Q3
22.92%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Frontline (FRO): A comparison of their net margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 44.95% and Frontline (FRO) at 65.83% convert sales into operating profit at a top-quartile rate, pointing to tighter cost discipline before financing and tax.

FANG

Energy industry group

44.95%

Max
71.31%
FANG
44.95%
Q3
33.75%
Median
18.73%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%

FRO

Energy industry group

65.83%

Max
71.31%
FRO
65.83%
Q3
33.75%
Median
18.73%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Frontline (FRO): A comparison of their operating margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Frontline (FRO)
MetricFANGFRO
ROE (TTM)4.86%53.85%
ROA (TTM)2.07%14.25%
Net Margin (TTM)11.62%54.76%
Operating Margin (TTM)44.95%65.83%
Gross Margin (TTM)73.62%63.03%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 35.44% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Frontline (FRO) at -4.16% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for FANG.

Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Frontline (FRO): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Frontline (FRO) at -23.77% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at -63.10% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.

Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Frontline (FRO): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Frontline (FRO)
MetricFANGFRO
Revenue Growth (YoY)35.44%-4.16%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)15.99%11.17%
EPS Growth (YoY)-63.10%-23.77%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)-38.48%-8.37%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Frontline (FRO) at 1.87 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 0.55 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for FANG.

FANG

Energy industry group

0.55

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
FANG
0.55
Min
0.24

FRO

Energy industry group

1.87

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
FRO
1.87
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Frontline (FRO): A comparison of their current ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 0.29 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Frontline (FRO) at 0.77 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.

FANG

Energy industry group

0.29

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
Q1
0.30
FANG
0.29
Min
0.00

FRO

Energy industry group

0.77

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
FRO
0.77
Median
0.54
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Frontline (FRO): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Frontline (FRO)
MetricFANGFRO
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.551.87
Debt / Equity (MRQ)0.290.77
Net Debt / EBITDA0.991.28

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 2.47% pays an industry-typical yield; Frontline (FRO) at 12.04% is above its entire peer range — the higher number, but one that calls for a look at payout sustainability before treating it as an advantage.

FANG

Energy industry group

2.47%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
FANG
2.47%
Median
1.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FRO

Energy industry group

12.04%

FRO
12.04%
Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
Median
1.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Frontline (FRO): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Frontline (FRO) at 46.93% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 57.20% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

FANG

Energy industry group

57.20%

Max
133.24%
FANG
57.20%
Q3
53.31%
Median
25.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FRO

Energy industry group

46.93%

Max
133.24%
Q3
53.31%
FRO
46.93%
Median
25.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Frontline (FRO): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Frontline (FRO)
MetricFANGFRO
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.47%12.04%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)57.20%46.93%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Frontline (FRO) at 6.81 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 24.09 sits in the richer quartile — a clear split in what investors pay for each dollar of trailing earnings.

FANG

Energy industry group

24.09

Max
39.54
FANG
24.09
Q3
21.72
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99

FRO

Energy industry group

6.81

Max
39.54
Q3
21.72
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
FRO
6.81
Min
2.99
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Frontline (FRO): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 2.83 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Frontline (FRO) at 3.72 sits in the pricier quartile — FRO costs more per dollar of sales.

FANG

Energy industry group

2.83

Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
FANG
2.83
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00

FRO

Energy industry group

3.72

Max
5.40
FRO
3.72
Q3
2.85
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Frontline (FRO): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 1.28 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Frontline (FRO) at 3.20 carries an above-peer premium to book — FRO is pricier on assets.

FANG

Energy industry group

1.28

Max
4.21
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
FANG
1.28
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01

FRO

Energy industry group

3.20

Max
4.21
FRO
3.20
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01
Loading chart…
Diamondback Energy (FANG) vs. Frontline (FRO): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Diamondback Energy (FANG) and Frontline (FRO)
MetricFANGFRO
P/E Ratio (TTM)24.096.81
P/S Ratio (TTM)2.833.72
P/B Ratio (MRQ)1.283.20
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)12.09%2.81%