ESLT vs. FER: Elbit Systems vs. Ferrovial Stock Comparison
How do Elbit Systems (ESLT) and Ferrovial (FER) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Elbit Systems (ESLT) and Ferrovial (FER) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but ESLT is classified in Aerospace & Defense while FER is classified in Construction & Engineering.
| Profile Item | ESLT | FER |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Elbit Systems Ltd. | Ferrovial N.V. |
| Country/Region | Israel | Netherlands |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Construction & Engineering |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Construction & Engineering |
| Market Capitalization | 32.00 billion USD | 42.19 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | Nasdaq | Nasdaq |
| Listing Date | November 27, 1996 | August 13, 2012 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | ESLT | FER |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 55.34% | -1.10% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 57.29% | 26.01% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 37.24% | 17.20% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
Ferrovial (FER) trades around 1.95M shares per day on average, while Elbit Systems (ESLT) sees only 88.09K — a volume gap that can matter for position sizing, exit liquidity, and order execution.
| Metric | ESLT | FER |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 47.34% | 27.38% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.10 | 0.36 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -35.54% | -33.67% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 88.09K | 1.95M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | ESLT | FER |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 1.08 | -0.20 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 1.76 | -0.30 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both Elbit Systems (ESLT) at 15.24% and Ferrovial (FER) at 11.62% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
ESLT
Capital Goods industry group
15.24%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- ESLT
- 15.24%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
FER
Capital Goods industry group
11.62%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- FER
- 11.62%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Elbit Systems (ESLT) at 7.44% and Ferrovial (FER) at 6.15% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
ESLT
Capital Goods industry group
7.44%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- ESLT
- 7.44%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
FER
Capital Goods industry group
6.15%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- FER
- 6.15%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Elbit Systems (ESLT) at 9.57% and Ferrovial (FER) at 10.45% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
ESLT
Capital Goods industry group
9.57%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- ESLT
- 9.57%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
FER
Capital Goods industry group
10.45%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- FER
- 10.45%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | ESLT | FER |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 15.24% | 11.62% |
| ROA (TTM) | 3.87% | 2.62% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 7.44% | 6.15% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 9.57% | 10.45% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 25.03% | 87.14% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Elbit Systems (ESLT) at 16.27% and Ferrovial (FER) at 5.24% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Elbit Systems (ESLT) at 58.64% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Ferrovial (FER) at -72.26% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in earnings momentum.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | ESLT | FER |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 16.27% | 5.24% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 12.93% | 8.43% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 58.64% | -72.26% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 22.61% | 70.54% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Elbit Systems (ESLT) at 1.40 and Ferrovial (FER) at 1.20 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.
ESLT
Capital Goods industry group
1.40
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- ESLT
- 1.40
- Min
- 0.36
FER
Capital Goods industry group
1.20
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- FER
- 1.20
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Elbit Systems (ESLT) at 0.19 keeps leverage in the lower quartile, while Ferrovial (FER) at 1.44 sits in the higher-leverage quartile.
ESLT
Capital Goods industry group
0.19
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- ESLT
- 0.19
- Min
- 0.00
FER
Capital Goods industry group
1.44
- Max
- 2.33
- FER
- 1.44
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | ESLT | FER |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.40 | 1.20 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.19 | 1.44 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -0.11 | 4.39 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Elbit Systems (ESLT) at 0.58% and Ferrovial (FER) at 0.94% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
ESLT
Capital Goods industry group
0.58%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- ESLT
- 0.58%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
FER
Capital Goods industry group
0.94%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- FER
- 0.94%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Elbit Systems (ESLT) at 23.33% keeps its payout in the industry’s typical band, while Ferrovial (FER) at 71.24% pays out more than any of its peers — the most stretched cover in its group.
ESLT
Capital Goods industry group
23.33%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- ESLT
- 23.33%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
FER
Capital Goods industry group
71.24%
- FER
- 71.24%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | ESLT | FER |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.58% | 0.94% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 23.33% | 71.24% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Ferrovial (FER) at 32.26 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Elbit Systems (ESLT) at 51.36 sits in the richer quartile — ESLT needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.
ESLT
Capital Goods industry group
51.36
- Max
- 59.38
- ESLT
- 51.36
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
FER
Capital Goods industry group
32.26
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- FER
- 32.26
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Elbit Systems (ESLT) at 3.74 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Ferrovial (FER) at 4.28 sits in the pricier quartile — FER costs more per dollar of sales.
ESLT
Capital Goods industry group
3.74
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- ESLT
- 3.74
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
FER
Capital Goods industry group
4.28
- Max
- 7.54
- FER
- 4.28
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Both Elbit Systems (ESLT) at 7.24 and Ferrovial (FER) at 6.59 carry a premium to book value versus peers, sitting in the upper P/B ratio quartile of their industries.
ESLT
Capital Goods industry group
7.24
- Max
- 9.66
- ESLT
- 7.24
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
FER
Capital Goods industry group
6.59
- Max
- 9.66
- FER
- 6.59
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ESLT | FER |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 51.36 | 32.26 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 3.74 | 4.28 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 7.24 | 6.59 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | -0.12% | 2.11% |