Seek Returns

EQT vs. FANG: EQT vs. Diamondback Energy Stock Comparison

How do EQT (EQT) and Diamondback Energy (FANG) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

EQT (EQT) and Diamondback Energy (FANG) are both classified in the Oil & Gas Exploration & Production sub-industry within the broader Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Company profile comparison for EQT (EQT) and Diamondback Energy (FANG)
Profile ItemEQTFANG
NameEQT CorporationDiamondback Energy Inc.
Country/RegionUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS Industry GroupEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryOil, Gas & Consumable FuelsOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
GICS Sub-IndustryOil & Gas Exploration & ProductionOil & Gas Exploration & Production
Market Capitalization30.90 billion USD49.96 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENasdaq
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980October 12, 2012
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

EQT
FANG
GSPC
Loading price history…
EQT (EQT) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for EQT (EQT) and Diamondback Energy (FANG). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for EQT (EQT) and Diamondback Energy (FANG). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for EQT (EQT) and Diamondback Energy (FANG)
MetricEQTFANG
Total Return (1Y)-12.42%26.99%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)9.89%8.52%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)21.61%14.17%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

EQT
FANG
GSPC
Loading price history…
EQT (EQT) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for EQT (EQT) and Diamondback Energy (FANG). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for EQT (EQT) and Diamondback Energy (FANG)
MetricEQTFANG
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)30.02%33.77%
Beta (5Y)0.700.53
Max Drawdown (5Y)-42.56%-42.10%
Avg. Volume (3M)7.75M2.38M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
EQT and FANG are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for EQT (EQT) and Diamondback Energy (FANG)
MetricEQTFANG
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)-0.560.67
Sortino Ratio (1Y)-0.800.97

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Both EQT (EQT) at 10.49% and Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 4.86% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

EQT

Energy industry group

10.49%

Max
53.85%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
EQT
10.49%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%

FANG

Energy industry group

4.86%

Max
53.85%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
FANG
4.86%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%
Loading chart…
EQT (EQT) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG): A comparison of their ROE against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

EQT (EQT) at 29.01% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 11.62%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

EQT

Energy industry group

29.01%

Max
56.92%
EQT
29.01%
Q3
22.92%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%

FANG

Energy industry group

11.62%

Max
56.92%
Q3
22.92%
FANG
11.62%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%
Loading chart…
EQT (EQT) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG): A comparison of their net margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 44.95% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of EQT (EQT) at 28.24%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

EQT

Energy industry group

28.24%

Max
71.31%
Q3
33.75%
EQT
28.24%
Median
18.73%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%

FANG

Energy industry group

44.95%

Max
71.31%
FANG
44.95%
Q3
33.75%
Median
18.73%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%
Loading chart…
EQT (EQT) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG): A comparison of their operating margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for EQT (EQT) and Diamondback Energy (FANG)
MetricEQTFANG
ROE (TTM)10.49%4.86%
ROA (TTM)6.25%2.07%
Net Margin (TTM)29.01%11.62%
Operating Margin (TTM)28.24%44.95%
Gross Margin (TTM)80.40%73.62%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Both companies are growing quickly, but EQT (EQT) at 59.96% is the standout with revenue growth above its industry range; Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 35.44% also sits in the top quartile.

Loading chart…
EQT (EQT) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

EQT (EQT) at 635.56% delivers above-range EPS growth, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at -63.10% falls into the bottom quartile — a wide split in earnings momentum.

Loading chart…
EQT (EQT) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for EQT (EQT) and Diamondback Energy (FANG)
MetricEQTFANG
Revenue Growth (YoY)59.96%35.44%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)-11.72%15.99%
EPS Growth (YoY)635.56%-63.10%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)-8.91%-38.48%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Both EQT (EQT) at 0.71 and Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 0.55 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.

EQT

Energy industry group

0.71

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
EQT
0.71
Min
0.24

FANG

Energy industry group

0.55

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
FANG
0.55
Min
0.24
Loading chart…
EQT (EQT) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG): A comparison of their current ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Both EQT (EQT) at 0.19 and Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 0.29 keep leverage in the lower quartile of their industries, with less balance-sheet debt relative to equity than most peers.

EQT

Energy industry group

0.19

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
Q1
0.30
EQT
0.19
Min
0.00

FANG

Energy industry group

0.29

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
Q1
0.30
FANG
0.29
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
EQT (EQT) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for EQT (EQT) and Diamondback Energy (FANG)
MetricEQTFANG
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.710.55
Debt / Equity (MRQ)0.190.29
Net Debt / EBITDA0.810.99

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both EQT (EQT) at 1.30% and Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 2.47% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

EQT

Energy industry group

1.30%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
Median
1.71%
EQT
1.30%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FANG

Energy industry group

2.47%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
FANG
2.47%
Median
1.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
EQT (EQT) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

EQT (EQT) at 15.64% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 57.20% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

EQT

Energy industry group

15.64%

Max
133.24%
Q3
53.31%
Median
25.24%
EQT
15.64%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FANG

Energy industry group

57.20%

Max
133.24%
FANG
57.20%
Q3
53.31%
Median
25.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
EQT (EQT) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for EQT (EQT) and Diamondback Energy (FANG)
MetricEQTFANG
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.30%2.47%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)15.64%57.20%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

EQT (EQT) at 11.71 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 24.09 sits in the richer quartile — FANG needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.

EQT

Energy industry group

11.71

Max
39.54
Q3
21.72
Median
12.19
EQT
11.71
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99

FANG

Energy industry group

24.09

Max
39.54
FANG
24.09
Q3
21.72
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99
Loading chart…
EQT (EQT) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 2.83 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while EQT (EQT) at 3.38 sits in the pricier quartile — EQT costs more per dollar of sales.

EQT

Energy industry group

3.38

Max
5.40
EQT
3.38
Q3
2.85
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00

FANG

Energy industry group

2.83

Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
FANG
2.83
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
EQT (EQT) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

On P/B ratio, both EQT (EQT) at 1.21 and Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 1.28 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

EQT

Energy industry group

1.21

Max
4.21
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
EQT
1.21
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01

FANG

Energy industry group

1.28

Max
4.21
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
FANG
1.28
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01
Loading chart…
EQT (EQT) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for EQT (EQT) and Diamondback Energy (FANG)
MetricEQTFANG
P/E Ratio (TTM)11.7124.09
P/S Ratio (TTM)3.382.83
P/B Ratio (MRQ)1.211.28
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)8.01%12.09%