EQNR vs. FANG: Equinor vs. Diamondback Energy Stock Comparison
How do Equinor (EQNR) and Diamondback Energy (FANG) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Equinor (EQNR) and Diamondback Energy (FANG) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though EQNR is classified under Integrated Oil & Gas while FANG falls under Oil & Gas Exploration & Production.
Diamondback Energy (FANG) trades as ordinary local shares, while Equinor (EQNR) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.
| Profile Item | EQNR | FANG |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Equinor ASA Sponsored ADR | Diamondback Energy Inc. |
| Country/Region | Norway | United States |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Integrated Oil & Gas | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Capitalization | 99.39 billion USD | 49.96 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | Nasdaq |
| Listing Date | June 18, 2001 | October 12, 2012 |
| Security Type | ADR | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | EQNR | FANG |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 78.03% | 26.99% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 17.56% | 8.52% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 17.66% | 14.17% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | EQNR | FANG |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 40.50% | 33.77% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.18 | 0.53 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -34.57% | -42.10% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 3.77M | 2.38M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | EQNR | FANG |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 1.82 | 0.67 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 2.76 | 0.97 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Equinor (EQNR) at 27.57% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 4.86% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for EQNR.
EQNR
Energy industry group
27.57%
- Max
- 53.85%
- EQNR
- 27.57%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
FANG
Energy industry group
4.86%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- FANG
- 4.86%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Equinor (EQNR) at 9.79% and Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 11.62% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
EQNR
Energy industry group
9.79%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- Median
- 10.10%
- EQNR
- 9.79%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
FANG
Energy industry group
11.62%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- FANG
- 11.62%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Equinor (EQNR) at 37.00% and Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 44.95% convert sales into operating profit at a top-quartile rate, pointing to tighter cost discipline before financing and tax.
EQNR
Energy industry group
37.00%
- Max
- 71.31%
- EQNR
- 37.00%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
FANG
Energy industry group
44.95%
- Max
- 71.31%
- FANG
- 44.95%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | EQNR | FANG |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 27.57% | 4.86% |
| ROA (TTM) | 17.10% | 2.07% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 9.79% | 11.62% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 37.00% | 44.95% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 43.18% | 73.62% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 35.44% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Equinor (EQNR) at 3.24% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for FANG.
EPS Growth
Equinor (EQNR) at -37.62% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at -63.10% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | EQNR | FANG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 3.24% | 35.44% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -10.78% | 15.99% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -37.62% | -63.10% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -40.11% | -38.48% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Equinor (EQNR) at 1.18 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 0.55 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for FANG.
EQNR
Energy industry group
1.18
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- EQNR
- 1.18
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
FANG
Energy industry group
0.55
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- FANG
- 0.55
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 0.29 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Equinor (EQNR) at 0.66 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.
EQNR
Energy industry group
0.66
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- EQNR
- 0.66
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
FANG
Energy industry group
0.29
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- FANG
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | EQNR | FANG |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.18 | 0.55 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.66 | 0.29 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.12 | 0.99 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Equinor (EQNR) at 3.67% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 2.47% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, EQNR the richer one.
EQNR
Energy industry group
3.67%
- Max
- 8.57%
- EQNR
- 3.67%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
FANG
Energy industry group
2.47%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- FANG
- 2.47%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Equinor (EQNR) at 31.54% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 57.20% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
EQNR
Energy industry group
31.54%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- EQNR
- 31.54%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
FANG
Energy industry group
57.20%
- Max
- 133.24%
- FANG
- 57.20%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | EQNR | FANG |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 3.67% | 2.47% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 31.54% | 57.20% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Equinor (EQNR) at 8.71 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 24.09 sits in the richer quartile — FANG needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.
EQNR
Energy industry group
8.71
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- EQNR
- 8.71
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
FANG
Energy industry group
24.09
- Max
- 39.54
- FANG
- 24.09
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Equinor (EQNR) at 0.82 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 2.83 prices around its industry’s middle — EQNR costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.
EQNR
Energy industry group
0.82
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- EQNR
- 0.82
- Min
- 0.00
FANG
Energy industry group
2.83
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- FANG
- 2.83
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 1.28 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Equinor (EQNR) at 4.44 prices above its benchmark range — EQNR looks rich relative to book.
EQNR
Energy industry group
4.44
- EQNR
- 4.44
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
FANG
Energy industry group
1.28
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- FANG
- 1.28
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | EQNR | FANG |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 8.71 | 24.09 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 0.82 | 2.83 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 4.44 | 1.28 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 32.55% | 12.09% |