EQH vs. NMR: Equitable vs. Nomura Stock Comparison
How do Equitable (EQH) and Nomura (NMR) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Equitable (EQH) and Nomura (NMR) both fall under the Financial Services industry group, but EQH is classified in Financial Services while NMR is classified in Capital Markets.
Equitable (EQH) trades as ordinary local shares, while Nomura (NMR) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.
| Profile Item | EQH | NMR |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Equitable Holdings Inc. | Nomura Holdings, Inc. Sponsored ADR |
| Country/Region | United States | Japan |
| GICS Sector | Financials | Financials |
| GICS Industry Group | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| GICS Industry | Financial Services | Capital Markets |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Diversified Financial Services | Investment Banking & Brokerage |
| Market Capitalization | 14.04 billion USD | 27.53 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | May 10, 2018 | December 17, 2001 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | ADR |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | EQH | NMR |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 26.35% | 35.42% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 32.07% | 37.86% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 12.88% | 18.78% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | EQH | NMR |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 33.44% | 29.52% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.04 | 0.79 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -35.85% | -38.40% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.71M | 789.26K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | EQH | NMR |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.66 | 1.06 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.94 | 1.55 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Equitable (EQH) at 171.08% clears its industry range for ROE, a sharper capital-efficiency signal than Nomura (NMR) at 11.51%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.
EQH
Financial Services industry group
171.08%
- EQH
- 171.08%
- Max
- 44.78%
- Q3
- 21.85%
- Median
- 12.91%
- Q1
- 4.48%
- Min
- -18.71%
NMR
Financial Services industry group
11.51%
- Max
- 44.78%
- Q3
- 21.85%
- Median
- 12.91%
- NMR
- 11.51%
- Q1
- 4.48%
- Min
- -18.71%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Equitable (EQH) at 11.52% and Nomura (NMR) at 17.12% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
EQH
Financial Services industry group
11.52%
- Max
- 62.84%
- Q3
- 28.05%
- Median
- 15.36%
- EQH
- 11.52%
- Q1
- 4.82%
- Min
- -28.52%
NMR
Financial Services industry group
17.12%
- Max
- 62.84%
- Q3
- 28.05%
- NMR
- 17.12%
- Median
- 15.36%
- Q1
- 4.82%
- Min
- -28.52%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Equitable (EQH) at 37.18% and Nomura (NMR) at 24.36% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
EQH
Financial Services industry group
37.18%
- Max
- 107.33%
- Q3
- 55.90%
- EQH
- 37.18%
- Median
- 30.09%
- Q1
- 14.60%
- Min
- -44.34%
NMR
Financial Services industry group
24.36%
- Max
- 107.33%
- Q3
- 55.90%
- Median
- 30.09%
- NMR
- 24.36%
- Q1
- 14.60%
- Min
- -44.34%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | EQH | NMR |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 171.08% | 11.51% |
| ROA (TTM) | 0.45% | 0.68% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 11.52% | 17.12% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 37.18% | 24.36% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | -- | -- |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Nomura (NMR) at 10.80% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Equitable (EQH) at -6.12% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Nomura (NMR) at 7.17% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Equitable (EQH) at -227.78% falls below its industry range, a notably weak earnings reading.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | EQH | NMR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -6.12% | 10.80% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -2.65% | 17.17% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -227.78% | 7.17% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -- | 58.75% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Equitable (EQH) in Financial Services and Nomura (NMR) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Equitable (EQH) in Financial Services and Nomura (NMR) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | EQH | NMR |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -- | -- |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Equitable (EQH) at 0.51% pays an industry-typical yield; Nomura (NMR) at 620.40% is above its entire peer range — the higher number, but one that calls for a look at payout sustainability before treating it as an advantage.
EQH
Financial Services industry group
0.51%
- Max
- 9.77%
- Q3
- 3.92%
- Median
- 1.09%
- EQH
- 0.51%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
NMR
Financial Services industry group
620.40%
- NMR
- 620.40%
- Max
- 9.77%
- Q3
- 3.92%
- Median
- 1.09%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Equitable (EQH) at 22.49% and Nomura (NMR) at 16.85% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
EQH
Financial Services industry group
22.49%
- Max
- 241.07%
- Q3
- 97.36%
- Median
- 25.77%
- EQH
- 22.49%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
NMR
Financial Services industry group
16.85%
- Max
- 241.07%
- Q3
- 97.36%
- Median
- 25.77%
- NMR
- 16.85%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | EQH | NMR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.51% | 620.40% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 22.49% | 16.85% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Equitable (EQH) at 10.39 and Nomura (NMR) at 10.83 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
EQH
Financial Services industry group
10.39
- Max
- 45.85
- Q3
- 24.64
- Median
- 15.37
- EQH
- 10.39
- Q1
- 9.68
- Min
- 0.16
NMR
Financial Services industry group
10.83
- Max
- 45.85
- Q3
- 24.64
- Median
- 15.37
- NMR
- 10.83
- Q1
- 9.68
- Min
- 0.16
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Both Equitable (EQH) at 1.08 and Nomura (NMR) at 0.01 fetch a relatively low price per dollar of sales, landing in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile of their industries.
EQH
Financial Services industry group
1.08
- Max
- 9.23
- Q3
- 4.57
- Median
- 2.72
- Q1
- 1.28
- EQH
- 1.08
- Min
- -0.55
NMR
Financial Services industry group
0.01
- Max
- 9.23
- Q3
- 4.57
- Median
- 2.72
- Q1
- 1.28
- NMR
- 0.01
- Min
- -0.55
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Equitable (EQH) reports a negative P/B ratio of -4.92, meaning negative book equity — the multiple itself is not meaningful for valuation. Meanwhile Nomura (NMR) reports 1.15, ranking against industry peers normally.
EQH
Financial Services industry group
-4.92
- Max
- 7.79
- Q3
- 3.63
- Median
- 1.57
- Q1
- 0.81
- Min
- -0.39
- EQH
- -4.92
NMR
Financial Services industry group
1.15
- Max
- 7.79
- Q3
- 3.63
- Median
- 1.57
- NMR
- 1.15
- Q1
- 0.81
- Min
- -0.39
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | EQH | NMR |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 10.39 | 10.83 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.08 | 0.01 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | -4.92 | 1.15 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | -- | -- |