EQH vs. GPN: Equitable vs. Global Payments Stock Comparison
How do Equitable (EQH) and Global Payments (GPN) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Equitable (EQH) and Global Payments (GPN) both belong to the Financial Services industry, though EQH is classified under Diversified Financial Services while GPN falls under Transaction & Payment Processing Services.
| Profile Item | EQH | GPN |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Equitable Holdings Inc. | Global Payments Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Financials | Financials |
| GICS Industry Group | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| GICS Industry | Financial Services | Financial Services |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Diversified Financial Services | Transaction & Payment Processing Services |
| Market Capitalization | 14.04 billion USD | 25.78 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | May 10, 2018 | January 16, 2001 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | EQH | GPN |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 26.35% | 31.53% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 32.07% | -1.66% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 12.88% | -4.82% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | EQH | GPN |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 33.44% | 42.00% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.04 | 0.80 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -35.85% | -57.06% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.71M | 2.69M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | EQH | GPN |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.66 | 0.65 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.94 | 1.10 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Equitable (EQH) at 171.08% delivers above-range ROE, while Global Payments (GPN) at 0.84% falls into the bottom quartile — a wide split in profit generated from equity.
EQH
Financial Services industry group
171.08%
- EQH
- 171.08%
- Max
- 44.78%
- Q3
- 21.85%
- Median
- 12.91%
- Q1
- 4.48%
- Min
- -18.71%
GPN
Financial Services industry group
0.84%
- Max
- 44.78%
- Q3
- 21.85%
- Median
- 12.91%
- Q1
- 4.48%
- GPN
- 0.84%
- Min
- -18.71%
Net Margin (TTM)
Global Payments (GPN) reports a negative net margin of -11.21%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Equitable (EQH) reports 11.52%, ranking against industry peers normally.
EQH
Financial Services industry group
11.52%
- Max
- 62.84%
- Q3
- 28.05%
- Median
- 15.36%
- EQH
- 11.52%
- Q1
- 4.82%
- Min
- -28.52%
GPN
Financial Services industry group
-11.21%
- Max
- 62.84%
- Q3
- 28.05%
- Median
- 15.36%
- Q1
- 4.82%
- GPN
- -11.21%
- Min
- -28.52%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Equitable (EQH) at 37.18% and Global Payments (GPN) at 15.73% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
EQH
Financial Services industry group
37.18%
- Max
- 107.33%
- Q3
- 55.90%
- EQH
- 37.18%
- Median
- 30.09%
- Q1
- 14.60%
- Min
- -44.34%
GPN
Financial Services industry group
15.73%
- Max
- 107.33%
- Q3
- 55.90%
- Median
- 30.09%
- GPN
- 15.73%
- Q1
- 14.60%
- Min
- -44.34%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | EQH | GPN |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 171.08% | 0.84% |
| ROA (TTM) | 0.45% | 2.24% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 11.52% | -11.21% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 37.18% | 15.73% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | -- | -- |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Equitable (EQH) at -6.12% and Global Payments (GPN) at -0.39% post bottom-quartile revenue growth versus peers, pointing to weaker demand or pricing momentum than typical rivals.
EPS Growth
Global Payments (GPN) at -6.17% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Equitable (EQH) at -227.78% falls below its industry range, a notably weak earnings reading.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | EQH | GPN |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -6.12% | -0.39% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -2.65% | -4.96% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -227.78% | -6.17% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -- | 143.57% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Equitable (EQH) in Financial Services and Global Payments (GPN) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Equitable (EQH) in Financial Services and Global Payments (GPN) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | EQH | GPN |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | -- | -- |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -- | -- |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Equitable (EQH) at 0.51% and Global Payments (GPN) at 1.05% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
EQH
Financial Services industry group
0.51%
- Max
- 9.77%
- Q3
- 3.92%
- Median
- 1.09%
- EQH
- 0.51%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
GPN
Financial Services industry group
1.05%
- Max
- 9.77%
- Q3
- 3.92%
- Median
- 1.09%
- GPN
- 1.05%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Global Payments (GPN) reports payout ratio above 100% at 178.57%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings and sustainability needs extra context. Meanwhile Equitable (EQH) reports 22.49%, ranking against industry peers normally.
EQH
Financial Services industry group
22.49%
- Max
- 241.07%
- Q3
- 97.36%
- Median
- 25.77%
- EQH
- 22.49%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
GPN
Financial Services industry group
178.57%
- Max
- 241.07%
- GPN
- 178.57%
- Q3
- 97.36%
- Median
- 25.77%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | EQH | GPN |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.51% | 1.05% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 22.49% | 178.57% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Equitable (EQH) at 10.39 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Global Payments (GPN) at 173.93 sits above its peer range — an unusually expensive price for GPN’s trailing earnings.
EQH
Financial Services industry group
10.39
- Max
- 45.85
- Q3
- 24.64
- Median
- 15.37
- EQH
- 10.39
- Q1
- 9.68
- Min
- 0.16
GPN
Financial Services industry group
173.93
- GPN
- 173.93
- Max
- 45.85
- Q3
- 24.64
- Median
- 15.37
- Q1
- 9.68
- Min
- 0.16
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Equitable (EQH) at 1.08 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Global Payments (GPN) at 2.24 prices around its industry’s middle — EQH costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.
EQH
Financial Services industry group
1.08
- Max
- 9.23
- Q3
- 4.57
- Median
- 2.72
- Q1
- 1.28
- EQH
- 1.08
- Min
- -0.55
GPN
Financial Services industry group
2.24
- Max
- 9.23
- Q3
- 4.57
- Median
- 2.72
- GPN
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.28
- Min
- -0.55
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Equitable (EQH) reports a negative P/B ratio of -4.92, meaning negative book equity — the multiple itself is not meaningful for valuation. Meanwhile Global Payments (GPN) reports 1.11, ranking against industry peers normally.
EQH
Financial Services industry group
-4.92
- Max
- 7.79
- Q3
- 3.63
- Median
- 1.57
- Q1
- 0.81
- Min
- -0.39
- EQH
- -4.92
GPN
Financial Services industry group
1.11
- Max
- 7.79
- Q3
- 3.63
- Median
- 1.57
- GPN
- 1.11
- Q1
- 0.81
- Min
- -0.39
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | EQH | GPN |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 10.39 | 173.93 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.08 | 2.24 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | -4.92 | 1.11 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | -- | -- |