ENB vs. FANG: Enbridge vs. Diamondback Energy Stock Comparison
How do Enbridge (ENB) and Diamondback Energy (FANG) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Enbridge (ENB) and Diamondback Energy (FANG) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though ENB is classified under Oil & Gas Storage & Transportation while FANG falls under Oil & Gas Exploration & Production.
| Profile Item | ENB | FANG |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Enbridge Inc. | Diamondback Energy Inc. |
| Country/Region | Canada | United States |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Oil & Gas Storage & Transportation | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Capitalization | 104.51 billion USD | 49.96 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | Nasdaq |
| Listing Date | March 15, 1984 | October 12, 2012 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | ENB | FANG |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 3.49% | 26.99% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 19.14% | 8.52% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 8.72% | 14.17% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | ENB | FANG |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 18.30% | 33.77% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.59 | 0.53 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -28.31% | -42.10% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 5.05M | 2.38M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | ENB | FANG |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.04 | 0.67 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.06 | 0.97 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both Enbridge (ENB) at 9.22% and Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 4.86% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
ENB
Energy industry group
9.22%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- ENB
- 9.22%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
FANG
Energy industry group
4.86%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- FANG
- 4.86%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Enbridge (ENB) at 7.34% and Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 11.62% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
ENB
Energy industry group
7.34%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- Median
- 10.10%
- ENB
- 7.34%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
FANG
Energy industry group
11.62%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- FANG
- 11.62%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 44.95% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Enbridge (ENB) at 10.16%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
ENB
Energy industry group
10.16%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- Median
- 18.73%
- ENB
- 10.16%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
FANG
Energy industry group
44.95%
- Max
- 71.31%
- FANG
- 44.95%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | ENB | FANG |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 9.22% | 4.86% |
| ROA (TTM) | 3.29% | 2.07% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 7.34% | 11.62% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 10.16% | 44.95% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 32.59% | 73.62% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Enbridge (ENB) at 21.92% and Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 35.44% sit in the top peer quartile for revenue growth, so each is growing its top line faster than typical industry peers.
EPS Growth
Enbridge (ENB) at 37.61% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at -63.10% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in earnings momentum.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | ENB | FANG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 21.92% | 35.44% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 6.94% | 15.99% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 37.61% | -63.10% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 36.00% | -38.48% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Enbridge (ENB) at 0.72 and Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 0.55 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.
ENB
Energy industry group
0.72
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- ENB
- 0.72
- Min
- 0.24
FANG
Energy industry group
0.55
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- FANG
- 0.55
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 0.29 keeps leverage in the lower quartile, while Enbridge (ENB) at 1.63 sits in the higher-leverage quartile.
ENB
Energy industry group
1.63
- Max
- 1.75
- ENB
- 1.63
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
FANG
Energy industry group
0.29
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- FANG
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | ENB | FANG |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 0.72 | 0.55 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 1.63 | 0.29 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 6.33 | 0.99 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Enbridge (ENB) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Diamondback Energy (FANG) reports a yield of 2.47%, ranking against industry peers normally.
ENB
Energy industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 1.71%
- ENB
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
FANG
Energy industry group
2.47%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- FANG
- 2.47%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Enbridge (ENB) reports payout ratio above 100% at 147.68%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings and sustainability needs extra context. Meanwhile Diamondback Energy (FANG) reports 57.20%, ranking against industry peers normally.
ENB
Energy industry group
147.68%
- ENB
- 147.68%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
FANG
Energy industry group
57.20%
- Max
- 133.24%
- FANG
- 57.20%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | ENB | FANG |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 2.47% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 147.68% | 57.20% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Enbridge (ENB) at 22.65 and Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 24.09 sit in the richer earnings-multiple quartile for P/E ratio, so investors are paying more for TTM earnings than they pay for typical peers.
ENB
Energy industry group
22.65
- Max
- 39.54
- ENB
- 22.65
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
FANG
Energy industry group
24.09
- Max
- 39.54
- FANG
- 24.09
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both Enbridge (ENB) at 1.25 and Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 2.83 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
ENB
Energy industry group
1.25
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- ENB
- 1.25
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
FANG
Energy industry group
2.83
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- FANG
- 2.83
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 1.28 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Enbridge (ENB) at 2.59 carries an above-peer premium to book — ENB is pricier on assets.
ENB
Energy industry group
2.59
- Max
- 4.21
- ENB
- 2.59
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
FANG
Energy industry group
1.28
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- FANG
- 1.28
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ENB | FANG |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 22.65 | 24.09 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.25 | 2.83 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 2.59 | 1.28 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | -1.01% | 12.09% |