EMBJ vs. FER: Embraer vs. Ferrovial Stock Comparison
How do Embraer (EMBJ) and Ferrovial (FER) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Embraer (EMBJ) and Ferrovial (FER) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but EMBJ is classified in Aerospace & Defense while FER is classified in Construction & Engineering.
Ferrovial (FER) trades as ordinary local shares, while Embraer (EMBJ) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.
| Profile Item | EMBJ | FER |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Embraer S.A. Sponsored American Depositary Receipt | Ferrovial N.V. |
| Country/Region | Brazil | Netherlands |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Construction & Engineering |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Construction & Engineering |
| Market Capitalization | 13.18 billion USD | 42.19 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | Nasdaq |
| Listing Date | July 21, 2000 | August 13, 2012 |
| Security Type | ADR | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | EMBJ | FER |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 20.08% | -1.10% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 72.16% | 26.01% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 35.19% | 17.20% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
Embraer (EMBJ) has an aggressive beta of 1.47, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Ferrovial (FER) is defensive at 0.36 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.
| Metric | EMBJ | FER |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 41.67% | 27.38% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.47 | 0.36 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -54.48% | -33.67% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 1.43M | 1.95M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | EMBJ | FER |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.38 | -0.20 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.52 | -0.30 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both Embraer (EMBJ) at 12.19% and Ferrovial (FER) at 11.62% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EMBJ
Capital Goods industry group
12.19%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- EMBJ
- 12.19%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
FER
Capital Goods industry group
11.62%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- FER
- 11.62%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Embraer (EMBJ) at 5.28% and Ferrovial (FER) at 6.15% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
EMBJ
Capital Goods industry group
5.28%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- EMBJ
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
FER
Capital Goods industry group
6.15%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- FER
- 6.15%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Embraer (EMBJ) at 12.98% and Ferrovial (FER) at 10.45% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
EMBJ
Capital Goods industry group
12.98%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- EMBJ
- 12.98%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
FER
Capital Goods industry group
10.45%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- FER
- 10.45%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | EMBJ | FER |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 12.19% | 11.62% |
| ROA (TTM) | 3.70% | 2.62% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 5.28% | 6.15% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 12.98% | 10.45% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 17.85% | 87.14% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Embraer (EMBJ) at 18.50% and Ferrovial (FER) at 5.24% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Embraer (EMBJ) at 0.10% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Ferrovial (FER) at -72.26% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | EMBJ | FER |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 18.50% | 5.24% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 18.62% | 8.43% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 0.10% | -72.26% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -- | 70.54% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Embraer (EMBJ) at 1.44 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Ferrovial (FER) at 1.20 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for FER.
EMBJ
Capital Goods industry group
1.44
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- EMBJ
- 1.44
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
FER
Capital Goods industry group
1.20
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- FER
- 1.20
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Embraer (EMBJ) at 0.69 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Ferrovial (FER) at 1.44 uses more debt funding than most peers.
EMBJ
Capital Goods industry group
0.69
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- EMBJ
- 0.69
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
FER
Capital Goods industry group
1.44
- Max
- 2.33
- FER
- 1.44
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | EMBJ | FER |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.44 | 1.20 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.69 | 1.44 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.52 | 4.39 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Embraer (EMBJ) at 0.97% and Ferrovial (FER) at 0.94% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
EMBJ
Capital Goods industry group
0.97%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- EMBJ
- 0.97%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
FER
Capital Goods industry group
0.94%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- FER
- 0.94%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both pay out more than their industries’ typical bands, and FER more so: Embraer (EMBJ) at 31.67% sits above the band, while Ferrovial (FER) at 71.24% exceeds every peer in its group.
EMBJ
Capital Goods industry group
31.67%
- Max
- 67.39%
- EMBJ
- 31.67%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
FER
Capital Goods industry group
71.24%
- FER
- 71.24%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | EMBJ | FER |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.97% | 0.94% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 31.67% | 71.24% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Embraer (EMBJ) at 29.99 and Ferrovial (FER) at 32.26 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
EMBJ
Capital Goods industry group
29.99
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- EMBJ
- 29.99
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
FER
Capital Goods industry group
32.26
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- FER
- 32.26
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Embraer (EMBJ) at 0.30 looks cheap on sales in the lower P/S ratio quartile, while Ferrovial (FER) at 4.28 looks rich in the upper quartile — a clear gap in price per dollar of revenue.
EMBJ
Capital Goods industry group
0.30
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- EMBJ
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.03
FER
Capital Goods industry group
4.28
- Max
- 7.54
- FER
- 4.28
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Embraer (EMBJ) at 3.70 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Ferrovial (FER) at 6.59 carries an above-peer premium to book — FER is pricier on assets.
EMBJ
Capital Goods industry group
3.70
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- EMBJ
- 3.70
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
FER
Capital Goods industry group
6.59
- Max
- 9.66
- FER
- 6.59
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | EMBJ | FER |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 29.99 | 32.26 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 0.30 | 4.28 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 3.70 | 6.59 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 12.70% | 2.11% |