EMA vs. KEP: Emera vs. Korea Electric Power Stock Comparison
How do Emera (EMA) and Korea Electric Power (KEP) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Emera (EMA) and Korea Electric Power (KEP) are both classified in the Electric Utilities sub-industry within the broader Electric Utilities industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.
Emera (EMA) trades as ordinary local shares, while Korea Electric Power (KEP) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.
| Profile Item | EMA | KEP |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Emera Inc. | Korea Electric Power Corporation Sponsored ADR |
| Country/Region | Canada | South Korea |
| GICS Sector | Utilities | Utilities |
| GICS Industry Group | Utilities | Utilities |
| GICS Industry | Electric Utilities | Electric Utilities |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Electric Utilities | Electric Utilities |
| Market Capitalization | 15.62 billion USD | 14.38 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | January 5, 2010 | October 27, 1994 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | ADR |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | EMA | KEP |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 9.07% | -25.98% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 18.64% | 20.85% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 6.45% | 2.90% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | EMA | KEP |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 16.26% | 46.68% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.40 | 0.97 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -32.61% | -55.55% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 713.97K | 949.70K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | EMA | KEP |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.29 | -0.65 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.43 | -0.93 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 16.60% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Emera (EMA) at 7.56% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for KEP.
EMA
Utilities industry group
7.56%
- Max
- 17.99%
- Q3
- 12.01%
- Median
- 9.44%
- EMA
- 7.56%
- Q1
- 7.56%
- Min
- 2.17%
KEP
Utilities industry group
16.60%
- Max
- 17.99%
- KEP
- 16.60%
- Q3
- 12.01%
- Median
- 9.44%
- Q1
- 7.56%
- Min
- 2.17%
Net Margin (TTM)
Emera (EMA) at 11.64% keeps about the industry-typical share of revenue as profit, while Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 8.04% retains only a bottom-quartile share.
EMA
Utilities industry group
11.64%
- Max
- 28.78%
- Q3
- 17.30%
- Median
- 12.73%
- EMA
- 11.64%
- Q1
- 9.18%
- Min
- -0.20%
KEP
Utilities industry group
8.04%
- Max
- 28.78%
- Q3
- 17.30%
- Median
- 12.73%
- Q1
- 9.18%
- KEP
- 8.04%
- Min
- -0.20%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Emera (EMA) at 17.85% runs core operations around its industry’s norm, while Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 4.73% operates in the bottom quartile.
EMA
Utilities industry group
17.85%
- Max
- 53.83%
- Q3
- 31.12%
- Median
- 23.62%
- EMA
- 17.85%
- Q1
- 15.45%
- Min
- -4.90%
KEP
Utilities industry group
4.73%
- Max
- 53.83%
- Q3
- 31.12%
- Median
- 23.62%
- Q1
- 15.45%
- KEP
- 4.73%
- Min
- -4.90%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | EMA | KEP |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 7.56% | 16.60% |
| ROA (TTM) | 2.91% | 3.04% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 11.64% | 8.04% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 17.85% | 4.73% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 43.76% | 15.97% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Emera (EMA) at 21.89% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 4.31% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for EMA.
EPS Growth
Both Emera (EMA) at 97.66% and Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 144.73% grew per-share earnings faster than their entire industry benchmark ranges for EPS growth — a strong showing on both sides, though a depressed base year can exaggerate the percentage, so the level of earnings matters too.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | EMA | KEP |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 21.89% | 4.31% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 4.97% | 11.03% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 97.66% | 144.73% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -1.62% | -- |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Emera (EMA) at 0.73 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 0.44 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for KEP.
EMA
Utilities industry group
0.73
- Max
- 1.90
- Q3
- 1.17
- Median
- 0.88
- EMA
- 0.73
- Q1
- 0.66
- Min
- 0.29
KEP
Utilities industry group
0.44
- Max
- 1.90
- Q3
- 1.17
- Median
- 0.88
- Q1
- 0.66
- KEP
- 0.44
- Min
- 0.29
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Emera (EMA) at 1.54 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 2.63 uses more debt funding than most peers.
EMA
Utilities industry group
1.54
- Max
- 2.63
- Q3
- 1.77
- EMA
- 1.54
- Median
- 1.35
- Q1
- 0.84
- Min
- 0.00
KEP
Utilities industry group
2.63
- KEP
- 2.63
- Max
- 2.63
- Q3
- 1.77
- Median
- 1.35
- Q1
- 0.84
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | EMA | KEP |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 0.73 | 0.44 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 1.54 | 2.63 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 6.38 | 5.13 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Emera (EMA) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Korea Electric Power (KEP) reports a yield of 13,891.89%, ranking against industry peers normally.
EMA
Utilities industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 6.66%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 2.85%
- Q1
- 0.66%
- EMA
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
KEP
Utilities industry group
13,891.89%
- KEP
- 13,891.89%
- Max
- 6.66%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 2.85%
- Q1
- 0.66%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 12.22% retains more earnings than its industry usually does; Emera (EMA) at 92.48% distributes an above-typical share — opposite departures from the band, with the risk sitting on EMA’s side.
EMA
Utilities industry group
92.48%
- Max
- 113.04%
- EMA
- 92.48%
- Q3
- 68.72%
- Median
- 56.38%
- Q1
- 32.38%
- Min
- 0.00%
KEP
Utilities industry group
12.22%
- Max
- 113.04%
- Q3
- 68.72%
- Median
- 56.38%
- Q1
- 32.38%
- KEP
- 12.22%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | EMA | KEP |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 13,891.89% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 92.48% | 12.22% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 2.66 trades below its industry P/E ratio range, while Emera (EMA) at 23.58 sits in the richer quartile — the market is paying very different prices for each company’s trailing earnings.
EMA
Utilities industry group
23.58
- Max
- 31.22
- EMA
- 23.58
- Q3
- 23.30
- Median
- 19.64
- Q1
- 15.17
- Min
- 3.34
KEP
Utilities industry group
2.66
- Max
- 31.22
- Q3
- 23.30
- Median
- 19.64
- Q1
- 15.17
- Min
- 3.34
- KEP
- 2.66
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 0.00 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Emera (EMA) at 1.75 prices around its industry’s middle — KEP costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.
EMA
Utilities industry group
1.75
- Max
- 6.35
- Q3
- 3.63
- Median
- 2.63
- EMA
- 1.75
- Q1
- 1.52
- Min
- 0.00
KEP
Utilities industry group
0.00
- Max
- 6.35
- Q3
- 3.63
- Median
- 2.63
- Q1
- 1.52
- KEP
- 0.00
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Korea Electric Power (KEP) at 0.38 sits in the lower P/B ratio quartile against book while Emera (EMA) at 1.80 is valued near its industry’s middle — KEP is cheaper on assets, though weigh it against ROE and asset quality.
EMA
Utilities industry group
1.80
- Max
- 3.12
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.83
- EMA
- 1.80
- Q1
- 1.46
- Min
- 0.34
KEP
Utilities industry group
0.38
- Max
- 3.12
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.83
- Q1
- 1.46
- KEP
- 0.38
- Min
- 0.34
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | EMA | KEP |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 23.58 | 2.66 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 1.75 | 0.00 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.80 | 0.38 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | -9.18% | 4,799.31% |