Seek Returns

DTM vs. FANG: DT Midstream vs. Diamondback Energy Stock Comparison

How do DT Midstream (DTM) and Diamondback Energy (FANG) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

DT Midstream (DTM) and Diamondback Energy (FANG) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though DTM is classified under Oil & Gas Storage & Transportation while FANG falls under Oil & Gas Exploration & Production.

Company profile comparison for DT Midstream (DTM) and Diamondback Energy (FANG)
Profile ItemDTMFANG
NameDT Midstream, Inc.Diamondback Energy Inc.
Country/RegionUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS Industry GroupEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryOil, Gas & Consumable FuelsOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
GICS Sub-IndustryOil & Gas Storage & TransportationOil & Gas Exploration & Production
Market Capitalization11.60 billion USD49.96 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENasdaq
Listing DateJuly 1, 2021October 12, 2012
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

DTM
FANG
GSPC
Loading price history…
DT Midstream (DTM) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for DT Midstream (DTM) and Diamondback Energy (FANG). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for DT Midstream (DTM) and Diamondback Energy (FANG). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for DT Midstream (DTM) and Diamondback Energy (FANG)
MetricDTMFANG
Total Return (1Y)4.08%26.99%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)32.58%8.52%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)23.68%14.17%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

DTM
FANG
GSPC
Loading price history…
DT Midstream (DTM) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for DT Midstream (DTM) and Diamondback Energy (FANG). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for DT Midstream (DTM) and Diamondback Energy (FANG)
MetricDTMFANG
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)23.13%33.77%
Beta (5Y)0.750.53
Max Drawdown (5Y)-24.59%-42.10%
Avg. Volume (3M)983.33K2.38M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
DTM and FANG are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for DT Midstream (DTM) and Diamondback Energy (FANG)
MetricDTMFANG
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)-0.010.67
Sortino Ratio (1Y)-0.010.97

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Both DT Midstream (DTM) at 9.92% and Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 4.86% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

DTM

Energy industry group

9.92%

Max
53.85%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
DTM
9.92%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%

FANG

Energy industry group

4.86%

Max
53.85%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
FANG
4.86%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%
Loading chart…
DT Midstream (DTM) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG): A comparison of their ROE against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

DT Midstream (DTM) at 35.36% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 11.62%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.

DTM

Energy industry group

35.36%

Max
56.92%
DTM
35.36%
Q3
22.92%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%

FANG

Energy industry group

11.62%

Max
56.92%
Q3
22.92%
FANG
11.62%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%
Loading chart…
DT Midstream (DTM) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG): A comparison of their net margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both DT Midstream (DTM) at 49.11% and Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 44.95% convert sales into operating profit at a top-quartile rate, pointing to tighter cost discipline before financing and tax.

DTM

Energy industry group

49.11%

Max
71.31%
DTM
49.11%
Q3
33.75%
Median
18.73%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%

FANG

Energy industry group

44.95%

Max
71.31%
FANG
44.95%
Q3
33.75%
Median
18.73%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%
Loading chart…
DT Midstream (DTM) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG): A comparison of their operating margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for DT Midstream (DTM) and Diamondback Energy (FANG)
MetricDTMFANG
ROE (TTM)9.92%4.86%
ROA (TTM)4.05%2.07%
Net Margin (TTM)35.36%11.62%
Operating Margin (TTM)49.11%44.95%
Gross Margin (TTM)75.38%73.62%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Both DT Midstream (DTM) at 26.71% and Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 35.44% sit in the top peer quartile for revenue growth, so each is growing its top line faster than typical industry peers.

Loading chart…
DT Midstream (DTM) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

DT Midstream (DTM) at 19.44% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at -63.10% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.

Loading chart…
DT Midstream (DTM) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for DT Midstream (DTM) and Diamondback Energy (FANG)
MetricDTMFANG
Revenue Growth (YoY)26.71%35.44%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)10.55%15.99%
EPS Growth (YoY)19.44%-63.10%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)4.12%-38.48%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

DT Midstream (DTM) at 1.16 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 0.55 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for FANG.

DTM

Energy industry group

1.16

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
DTM
1.16
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24

FANG

Energy industry group

0.55

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
FANG
0.55
Min
0.24
Loading chart…
DT Midstream (DTM) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG): A comparison of their current ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 0.29 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while DT Midstream (DTM) at 0.67 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.

DTM

Energy industry group

0.67

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
DTM
0.67
Median
0.54
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

FANG

Energy industry group

0.29

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
Q1
0.30
FANG
0.29
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
DT Midstream (DTM) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for DT Midstream (DTM) and Diamondback Energy (FANG)
MetricDTMFANG
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.160.55
Debt / Equity (MRQ)0.670.29
Net Debt / EBITDA3.300.99

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both DT Midstream (DTM) at 3.07% and Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 2.47% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

DTM

Energy industry group

3.07%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
DTM
3.07%
Median
1.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FANG

Energy industry group

2.47%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
FANG
2.47%
Median
1.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
DT Midstream (DTM) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both DT Midstream (DTM) at 75.38% and Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 57.20% pay out an above-typical share of earnings for their industries, leaving thinner cover if profits dip.

DTM

Energy industry group

75.38%

Max
133.24%
DTM
75.38%
Q3
53.31%
Median
25.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FANG

Energy industry group

57.20%

Max
133.24%
FANG
57.20%
Q3
53.31%
Median
25.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
DT Midstream (DTM) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for DT Midstream (DTM) and Diamondback Energy (FANG)
MetricDTMFANG
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.07%2.47%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)75.38%57.20%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

Both DT Midstream (DTM) at 24.76 and Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 24.09 sit in the richer earnings-multiple quartile for P/E ratio, so investors are paying more for TTM earnings than they pay for typical peers.

DTM

Energy industry group

24.76

Max
39.54
DTM
24.76
Q3
21.72
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99

FANG

Energy industry group

24.09

Max
39.54
FANG
24.09
Q3
21.72
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99
Loading chart…
DT Midstream (DTM) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 2.83 prices around its industry’s typical P/S ratio, while DT Midstream (DTM) at 8.70 clears its benchmark range — DTM looks notably rich on sales.

DTM

Energy industry group

8.70

DTM
8.70
Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00

FANG

Energy industry group

2.83

Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
FANG
2.83
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
DT Midstream (DTM) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 1.28 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while DT Midstream (DTM) at 2.41 carries an above-peer premium to book — DTM is pricier on assets.

DTM

Energy industry group

2.41

Max
4.21
DTM
2.41
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01

FANG

Energy industry group

1.28

Max
4.21
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
FANG
1.28
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01
Loading chart…
DT Midstream (DTM) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for DT Midstream (DTM) and Diamondback Energy (FANG)
MetricDTMFANG
P/E Ratio (TTM)24.7624.09
P/S Ratio (TTM)8.702.83
P/B Ratio (MRQ)2.411.28
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)2.27%12.09%