DINO vs. WDS: HF Sinclair vs. Woodside Energy Stock Comparison
How do HF Sinclair (DINO) and Woodside Energy (WDS) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
HF Sinclair (DINO) and Woodside Energy (WDS) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though DINO is classified under Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing while WDS falls under Oil & Gas Exploration & Production.
HF Sinclair (DINO) trades as ordinary local shares, while Woodside Energy (WDS) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.
| Profile Item | DINO | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| Name | HF Sinclair Corporation | Woodside Energy Group Ltd ADR |
| Country/Region | United States | Australia |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Capitalization | 16.45 billion USD | 40.00 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | March 17, 1980 | November 18, 1996 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | ADR |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | DINO | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 90.18% | 30.30% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 29.39% | 5.67% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 28.64% | 11.65% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | DINO | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 41.52% | 33.53% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.76 | 0.38 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -57.35% | -48.77% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 2.52M | 570.04K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | DINO | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 2.07 | 0.78 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 3.06 | 1.11 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
HF Sinclair (DINO) at 33.21% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Woodside Energy (WDS) at 7.68% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for DINO.
DINO
Energy industry group
33.21%
- Max
- 53.85%
- DINO
- 33.21%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
WDS
Energy industry group
7.68%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- WDS
- 7.68%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both HF Sinclair (DINO) at 10.13% and Woodside Energy (WDS) at 22.21% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
DINO
Energy industry group
10.13%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- DINO
- 10.13%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
WDS
Energy industry group
22.21%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- WDS
- 22.21%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both HF Sinclair (DINO) at 25.13% and Woodside Energy (WDS) at 23.91% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
DINO
Energy industry group
25.13%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- DINO
- 25.13%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
WDS
Energy industry group
23.91%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- WDS
- 23.91%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | DINO | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 33.21% | 7.68% |
| ROA (TTM) | 15.77% | 2.83% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 10.13% | 22.21% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 25.13% | 23.91% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 18.01% | 34.92% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both HF Sinclair (DINO) at -5.99% and Woodside Energy (WDS) at -1.48% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
HF Sinclair (DINO) at 238.46% clears its industry range for EPS growth, a much stronger earnings trajectory than Woodside Energy (WDS) at -24.02%, which is closer to a typical peer reading.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | DINO | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -5.99% | -1.48% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -11.07% | -8.26% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 238.46% | -24.02% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -40.03% | -30.68% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Woodside Energy (WDS) at 1.39 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while HF Sinclair (DINO) at 2.27 sits above its industry’s typical mid-range — comfortable liquidity, though possibly with more idle current assets relative to peers.
DINO
Energy industry group
2.27
- Max
- 3.64
- DINO
- 2.27
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
WDS
Energy industry group
1.39
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- WDS
- 1.39
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
HF Sinclair (DINO) at 0.29 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Woodside Energy (WDS) at 0.33 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.
DINO
Energy industry group
0.29
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- DINO
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
WDS
Energy industry group
0.33
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- WDS
- 0.33
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | DINO | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 2.27 | 1.39 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.29 | 0.33 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.01 | 1.15 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Woodside Energy (WDS) at 5.41% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while HF Sinclair (DINO) at 2.07% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, WDS the richer one.
DINO
Energy industry group
2.07%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- DINO
- 2.07%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
WDS
Energy industry group
5.41%
- Max
- 8.57%
- WDS
- 5.41%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
HF Sinclair (DINO) at 10.32% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Woodside Energy (WDS) at 69.78% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
DINO
Energy industry group
10.32%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- DINO
- 10.32%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
WDS
Energy industry group
69.78%
- Max
- 133.24%
- WDS
- 69.78%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | DINO | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 2.07% | 5.41% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 10.32% | 69.78% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
HF Sinclair (DINO) at 4.95 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Woodside Energy (WDS) at 13.15 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for DINO, though growth and earnings durability still matter.
DINO
Energy industry group
4.95
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- DINO
- 4.95
- Min
- 2.99
WDS
Energy industry group
13.15
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- WDS
- 13.15
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
HF Sinclair (DINO) at 0.47 looks cheap on sales in the lower P/S ratio quartile, while Woodside Energy (WDS) at 2.89 looks rich in the upper quartile — a clear gap in price per dollar of revenue.
DINO
Energy industry group
0.47
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- DINO
- 0.47
- Min
- 0.00
WDS
Energy industry group
2.89
- Max
- 5.40
- WDS
- 2.89
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both HF Sinclair (DINO) at 1.43 and Woodside Energy (WDS) at 1.11 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
DINO
Energy industry group
1.43
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- DINO
- 1.43
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
WDS
Energy industry group
1.11
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- WDS
- 1.11
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | DINO | WDS |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 4.95 | 13.15 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 0.47 | 2.89 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.43 | 1.11 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 18.17% | 1.41% |