Seek Returns

DINO vs. FANG: HF Sinclair vs. Diamondback Energy Stock Comparison

How do HF Sinclair (DINO) and Diamondback Energy (FANG) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

HF Sinclair (DINO) and Diamondback Energy (FANG) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though DINO is classified under Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing while FANG falls under Oil & Gas Exploration & Production.

Company profile comparison for HF Sinclair (DINO) and Diamondback Energy (FANG)
Profile ItemDINOFANG
NameHF Sinclair CorporationDiamondback Energy Inc.
Country/RegionUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS Industry GroupEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryOil, Gas & Consumable FuelsOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
GICS Sub-IndustryOil & Gas Refining & MarketingOil & Gas Exploration & Production
Market Capitalization16.45 billion USD49.96 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENasdaq
Listing DateMarch 17, 1980October 12, 2012
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

DINO
FANG
GSPC
Loading price history…
HF Sinclair (DINO) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for HF Sinclair (DINO) and Diamondback Energy (FANG). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for HF Sinclair (DINO) and Diamondback Energy (FANG). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for HF Sinclair (DINO) and Diamondback Energy (FANG)
MetricDINOFANG
Total Return (1Y)90.18%26.99%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)29.39%8.52%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)28.64%14.17%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

DINO
FANG
GSPC
Loading price history…
HF Sinclair (DINO) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for HF Sinclair (DINO) and Diamondback Energy (FANG). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for HF Sinclair (DINO) and Diamondback Energy (FANG)
MetricDINOFANG
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)41.52%33.77%
Beta (5Y)0.760.53
Max Drawdown (5Y)-57.35%-42.10%
Avg. Volume (3M)2.52M2.38M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
DINO and FANG are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for HF Sinclair (DINO) and Diamondback Energy (FANG)
MetricDINOFANG
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)2.070.67
Sortino Ratio (1Y)3.060.97

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

HF Sinclair (DINO) at 33.21% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 4.86% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for DINO.

DINO

Energy industry group

33.21%

Max
53.85%
DINO
33.21%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%

FANG

Energy industry group

4.86%

Max
53.85%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
FANG
4.86%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%
Loading chart…
HF Sinclair (DINO) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG): A comparison of their ROE against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Both HF Sinclair (DINO) at 10.13% and Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 11.62% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

DINO

Energy industry group

10.13%

Max
56.92%
Q3
22.92%
DINO
10.13%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%

FANG

Energy industry group

11.62%

Max
56.92%
Q3
22.92%
FANG
11.62%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%
Loading chart…
HF Sinclair (DINO) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG): A comparison of their net margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 44.95% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of HF Sinclair (DINO) at 25.13%, which runs around its industry’s norm.

DINO

Energy industry group

25.13%

Max
71.31%
Q3
33.75%
DINO
25.13%
Median
18.73%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%

FANG

Energy industry group

44.95%

Max
71.31%
FANG
44.95%
Q3
33.75%
Median
18.73%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%
Loading chart…
HF Sinclair (DINO) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG): A comparison of their operating margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for HF Sinclair (DINO) and Diamondback Energy (FANG)
MetricDINOFANG
ROE (TTM)33.21%4.86%
ROA (TTM)15.77%2.07%
Net Margin (TTM)10.13%11.62%
Operating Margin (TTM)25.13%44.95%
Gross Margin (TTM)18.01%73.62%

Growth

Revenue Growth

Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 35.44% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while HF Sinclair (DINO) at -5.99% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for FANG.

Loading chart…
HF Sinclair (DINO) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

HF Sinclair (DINO) at 238.46% delivers above-range EPS growth, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at -63.10% falls into the bottom quartile — a wide split in earnings momentum.

Loading chart…
HF Sinclair (DINO) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for HF Sinclair (DINO) and Diamondback Energy (FANG)
MetricDINOFANG
Revenue Growth (YoY)-5.99%35.44%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)-11.07%15.99%
EPS Growth (YoY)238.46%-63.10%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)-40.03%-38.48%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

HF Sinclair (DINO) at 2.27 carries current ratio above its industry’s typical mid-range, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 0.55 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — different working-capital profiles, both worth examining.

DINO

Energy industry group

2.27

Max
3.64
DINO
2.27
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24

FANG

Energy industry group

0.55

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
FANG
0.55
Min
0.24
Loading chart…
HF Sinclair (DINO) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG): A comparison of their current ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Both HF Sinclair (DINO) at 0.29 and Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 0.29 keep leverage in the lower quartile of their industries, with less balance-sheet debt relative to equity than most peers.

DINO

Energy industry group

0.29

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
Q1
0.30
DINO
0.29
Min
0.00

FANG

Energy industry group

0.29

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
Q1
0.30
FANG
0.29
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
HF Sinclair (DINO) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for HF Sinclair (DINO) and Diamondback Energy (FANG)
MetricDINOFANG
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.270.55
Debt / Equity (MRQ)0.290.29
Net Debt / EBITDA0.010.99

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both HF Sinclair (DINO) at 2.07% and Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 2.47% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

DINO

Energy industry group

2.07%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
DINO
2.07%
Median
1.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FANG

Energy industry group

2.47%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
FANG
2.47%
Median
1.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
HF Sinclair (DINO) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

HF Sinclair (DINO) at 10.32% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 57.20% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.

DINO

Energy industry group

10.32%

Max
133.24%
Q3
53.31%
Median
25.24%
DINO
10.32%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

FANG

Energy industry group

57.20%

Max
133.24%
FANG
57.20%
Q3
53.31%
Median
25.24%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
HF Sinclair (DINO) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for HF Sinclair (DINO) and Diamondback Energy (FANG)
MetricDINOFANG
Dividend Yield (TTM)2.07%2.47%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)10.32%57.20%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

HF Sinclair (DINO) at 4.95 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 24.09 sits in the richer quartile — a clear split in what investors pay for each dollar of trailing earnings.

DINO

Energy industry group

4.95

Max
39.54
Q3
21.72
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
DINO
4.95
Min
2.99

FANG

Energy industry group

24.09

Max
39.54
FANG
24.09
Q3
21.72
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99
Loading chart…
HF Sinclair (DINO) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

HF Sinclair (DINO) at 0.47 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 2.83 prices around its industry’s middle — DINO costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.

DINO

Energy industry group

0.47

Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
DINO
0.47
Min
0.00

FANG

Energy industry group

2.83

Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
FANG
2.83
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
HF Sinclair (DINO) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

On P/B ratio, both HF Sinclair (DINO) at 1.43 and Diamondback Energy (FANG) at 1.28 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

DINO

Energy industry group

1.43

Max
4.21
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
DINO
1.43
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01

FANG

Energy industry group

1.28

Max
4.21
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
FANG
1.28
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01
Loading chart…
HF Sinclair (DINO) vs. Diamondback Energy (FANG): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for HF Sinclair (DINO) and Diamondback Energy (FANG)
MetricDINOFANG
P/E Ratio (TTM)4.9524.09
P/S Ratio (TTM)0.472.83
P/B Ratio (MRQ)1.431.28
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)18.17%12.09%