DHR vs. TEM: Danaher vs. Tempus AI Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Danaher (DHR) and Tempus AI (TEM) are both classified in the Life Sciences Tools & Services sub-industry within the broader Life Sciences Tools & Services industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.

Danaher (DHR) carries decades of public-market history since December 29, 1978, while Tempus AI (TEM) listed on June 14, 2024 — long-window comparisons have far more historical data on the DHR side.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Tempus AI (TEM) carries a highly aggressive beta of 3.34, indicating much higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, whereas Danaher (DHR) is closer to market-like at 0.76 — a noticeable difference in market-sensitivity profile.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Tempus AI (TEM) reports a negative ROE of -37.55%; negative ROE can reflect losses or negative shareholders’ equity, so it is harder to read as capital efficiency. Meanwhile Danaher (DHR) reports 8.19%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Tempus AI (TEM) reports a negative net margin of -12.54%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Danaher (DHR) reports 16.91%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Tempus AI (TEM) reports a negative operating margin of -13.82%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile Danaher (DHR) reports 21.13%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Tempus AI (TEM) at 83.41% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Danaher (DHR) at 2.90% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for TEM.

Only one side can be read here: Danaher (DHR) reports EPS growth of -4.54%, ranked against its industry; Tempus AI (TEM) has no EPS growth figure this period.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Tempus AI (TEM) at 2.61 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Danaher (DHR) at 1.63 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for DHR.

Danaher (DHR) at 0.52 is near its industry mid-range for debt-to-equity ratio, while Tempus AI (TEM) at 2.86 sits above its benchmark range, pointing to a heavier debt load relative to equity.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Tempus AI (TEM) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Danaher (DHR) reports a yield of 0.67%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Tempus AI (TEM) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Danaher (DHR) reports a payout of 25.17%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

An earnings multiple is available for just one side: Danaher (DHR) trades at 38.12 times trailing earnings, ranked against its peers, while Tempus AI (TEM) has no P/E ratio this period.

On P/S ratio, both Danaher (DHR) at 6.32 and Tempus AI (TEM) at 9.19 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.

Danaher (DHR) at 3.02 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Tempus AI (TEM) at 27.66 prices above its benchmark range — TEM looks rich relative to book.

Valuation Metrics