CX vs. NTR: CEMEX vs. Nutrien Stock Comparison
How do CEMEX (CX) and Nutrien (NTR) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
CEMEX (CX) and Nutrien (NTR) both fall under the Materials industry group, but CX is classified in Construction Materials while NTR is classified in Chemicals.
Nutrien (NTR) trades as ordinary local shares, while CEMEX (CX) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.
| Profile Item | CX | NTR |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Cemex S.A.B. de C.V. Sponsored ADR | Nutrien Ltd. |
| Country/Region | Mexico | Canada |
| GICS Sector | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry Group | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry | Construction Materials | Chemicals |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Construction Materials | Fertilizers & Agricultural Chemicals |
| Market Capitalization | 15.47 billion USD | 33.89 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | September 15, 1999 | January 2, 2018 |
| Security Type | ADR | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CX | NTR |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 7.57% | 30.80% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 17.84% | 13.84% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 10.81% | 4.29% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
CEMEX (CX) has an aggressive beta of 1.57, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Nutrien (NTR) is defensive at 0.64 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.
| Metric | CX | NTR |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 36.82% | 32.77% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.57 | 0.64 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -53.08% | -58.17% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 7.01M | 2.56M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CX | NTR |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.09 | 0.81 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.14 | 1.18 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both CEMEX (CX) at 5.17% and Nutrien (NTR) at 8.76% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
CX
Materials industry group
5.17%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- CX
- 5.17%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
NTR
Materials industry group
8.76%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- NTR
- 8.76%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both CEMEX (CX) at 3.60% and Nutrien (NTR) at 8.04% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
CX
Materials industry group
3.60%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- Median
- 5.28%
- CX
- 3.60%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
NTR
Materials industry group
8.04%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- NTR
- 8.04%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both CEMEX (CX) at 14.77% and Nutrien (NTR) at 10.97% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
CX
Materials industry group
14.77%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- CX
- 14.77%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
NTR
Materials industry group
10.97%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- Median
- 12.56%
- NTR
- 10.97%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CX | NTR |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 5.17% | 8.76% |
| ROA (TTM) | 5.07% | 4.24% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 3.60% | 8.04% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 14.77% | 10.97% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 33.48% | 31.60% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both CEMEX (CX) at 0.43% and Nutrien (NTR) at 3.52% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Nutrien (NTR) at 242.65% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while CEMEX (CX) at 2.35% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for NTR.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CX | NTR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 0.43% | 3.52% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 3.13% | -10.80% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 2.35% | 242.65% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 4.14% | -30.99% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both CEMEX (CX) at 0.95 and Nutrien (NTR) at 1.41 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.
CX
Materials industry group
0.95
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- CX
- 0.95
- Min
- 0.16
NTR
Materials industry group
1.41
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- NTR
- 1.41
- Min
- 0.16
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both CEMEX (CX) at 0.46 and Nutrien (NTR) at 0.55 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
CX
Materials industry group
0.46
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- CX
- 0.46
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
NTR
Materials industry group
0.55
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- NTR
- 0.55
- Median
- 0.47
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CX | NTR |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 0.95 | 1.41 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.46 | 0.55 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.60 | 2.38 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
CEMEX (CX) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Nutrien (NTR) reports a yield of 3.03%, ranking against industry peers normally.
CX
Materials industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- Median
- 0.38%
- CX
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
NTR
Materials industry group
3.03%
- Max
- 4.52%
- NTR
- 3.03%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both CEMEX (CX) at 67.86% and Nutrien (NTR) at 47.93% pay out an above-typical share of earnings for their industries, leaving thinner cover if profits dip.
CX
Materials industry group
67.86%
- Max
- 83.62%
- CX
- 67.86%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
NTR
Materials industry group
47.93%
- Max
- 83.62%
- NTR
- 47.93%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CX | NTR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 3.03% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 67.86% | 47.93% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Nutrien (NTR) at 15.61 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while CEMEX (CX) at 67.00 sits above its peer range — an unusually expensive price for CX’s trailing earnings.
CX
Materials industry group
67.00
- CX
- 67.00
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
NTR
Materials industry group
15.61
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- Median
- 18.82
- NTR
- 15.61
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both CEMEX (CX) at 0.89 and Nutrien (NTR) at 1.24 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
CX
Materials industry group
0.89
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- Median
- 1.87
- CX
- 0.89
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
NTR
Materials industry group
1.24
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- Median
- 1.87
- NTR
- 1.24
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
CEMEX (CX) at 1.20 sits in the lower P/B ratio quartile against book while Nutrien (NTR) at 1.32 is valued near its industry’s middle — CX is cheaper on assets, though weigh it against ROE and asset quality.
CX
Materials industry group
1.20
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- CX
- 1.20
- Min
- -0.17
NTR
Materials industry group
1.32
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- NTR
- 1.32
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CX | NTR |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 67.00 | 15.61 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 0.89 | 1.24 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.20 | 1.32 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 8.86% | 5.77% |