CW vs. TDG: Curtiss-Wright vs. TransDigm Stock Comparison
How do Curtiss-Wright (CW) and TransDigm (TDG) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Curtiss-Wright (CW) and TransDigm (TDG) are both classified in the Aerospace & Defense sub-industry within the broader Aerospace & Defense industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.
| Profile Item | CW | TDG |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Curtiss-Wright Corporation | TransDigm Group Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Capitalization | 16.81 billion USD | 66.17 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | March 17, 1980 | March 15, 2006 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CW | TDG |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -15.83% | -3.42% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 33.49% | 14.26% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 29.54% | 16.86% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | CW | TDG |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 38.26% | 28.03% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.93 | 0.94 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -45.25% | -29.05% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 427.49K | 369.72K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CW | TDG |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.53 | -0.27 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.71 | -0.38 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Capital efficiency shows on one side only: Curtiss-Wright (CW) earns 21.82% on shareholders’ equity, ranked against its industry; TransDigm (TDG) has no ROE this period.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
21.82%
- Max
- 40.55%
- CW
- 21.82%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
TDG
Capital Goods industry group
--
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
- TDG
- --
Net Margin (TTM)
For every dollar of sales, both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 14.86% and TransDigm (TDG) at 21.28% retain more as net profit than most peers, landing in the top net margin quartile of their industries.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
14.86%
- Max
- 27.47%
- CW
- 14.86%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
TDG
Capital Goods industry group
21.28%
- Max
- 27.47%
- TDG
- 21.28%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
TransDigm (TDG) at 46.01% shows unusually strong operating efficiency — above its industry’s operating margin range — and Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 19.87% also operates in the top quartile.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
19.87%
- Max
- 36.60%
- CW
- 19.87%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
TDG
Capital Goods industry group
46.01%
- TDG
- 46.01%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CW | TDG |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 21.82% | -- |
| ROA (TTM) | 8.90% | 11.82% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 14.86% | 21.28% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 19.87% | 46.01% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 38.07% | 59.82% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 12.08% and TransDigm (TDG) at 11.22% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 21.99% and TransDigm (TDG) at 25.21% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CW | TDG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 12.08% | 11.22% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 11.01% | 17.61% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 21.99% | 25.21% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 19.09% | 33.78% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
TransDigm (TDG) at 3.02 carries current ratio above its industry’s typical mid-range, while Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 1.42 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — different working-capital profiles, both worth examining.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
1.42
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- CW
- 1.42
- Min
- 0.36
TDG
Capital Goods industry group
3.02
- Max
- 5.22
- TDG
- 3.02
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Only one side’s leverage can be read here: Curtiss-Wright (CW) carries debt-to-equity ratio of 0.45 against its industry range, while TransDigm (TDG) reports no figure this period.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
0.45
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- CW
- 0.45
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
TDG
Capital Goods industry group
--
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
- TDG
- --
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CW | TDG |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.42 | 3.02 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.45 | -- |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.00 | 6.03 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
TransDigm (TDG) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Curtiss-Wright (CW) reports a yield of 0.23%, ranking against industry peers normally.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
0.23%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- CW
- 0.23%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
TDG
Capital Goods industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- TDG
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
TransDigm (TDG) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Curtiss-Wright (CW) reports a payout of 6.67%, ranking against industry peers normally.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
6.67%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- CW
- 6.67%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
TDG
Capital Goods industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- TDG
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CW | TDG |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.23% | 0.00% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 6.67% | 0.00% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 30.92 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while TransDigm (TDG) at 36.31 sits in the richer quartile — TDG needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
30.92
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- CW
- 30.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
TDG
Capital Goods industry group
36.31
- Max
- 59.38
- TDG
- 36.31
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 4.50 and TransDigm (TDG) at 6.61 command a richer price per dollar of sales than most peers, sitting in the upper P/S ratio quartile of their industries.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
4.50
- Max
- 7.54
- CW
- 4.50
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
TDG
Capital Goods industry group
6.61
- Max
- 7.54
- TDG
- 6.61
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
TransDigm (TDG) reports a negative P/B ratio of -6.74, meaning negative book equity — the multiple itself is not meaningful for valuation. Meanwhile Curtiss-Wright (CW) reports 6.64, ranking against industry peers normally.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
6.64
- Max
- 9.66
- CW
- 6.64
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
TDG
Capital Goods industry group
-6.74
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
- TDG
- -6.74
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CW | TDG |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 30.92 | 36.31 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 4.50 | 6.61 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 6.64 | -6.74 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 2.86% | 2.20% |