CW vs. ROK: Curtiss-Wright vs. Rockwell Automation Stock Comparison
How do Curtiss-Wright (CW) and Rockwell Automation (ROK) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Curtiss-Wright (CW) and Rockwell Automation (ROK) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but CW is classified in Aerospace & Defense while ROK is classified in Electrical Equipment.
| Profile Item | CW | ROK |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Curtiss-Wright Corporation | Rockwell Automation Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Electrical Equipment |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Electrical Components & Equipment |
| Market Capitalization | 16.81 billion USD | 41.82 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | March 17, 1980 | December 31, 1981 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CW | ROK |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -15.83% | 6.19% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 33.49% | 16.94% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 29.54% | 4.86% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | CW | ROK |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 38.26% | 34.28% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.93 | 1.54 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -45.25% | -45.09% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 427.49K | 799.28K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CW | ROK |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.53 | 0.06 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.71 | 0.07 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 21.82% and Rockwell Automation (ROK) at 38.73% sit in the top peer quartile for ROE, suggesting each generates more profit from shareholders’ equity than typical industry peers.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
21.82%
- Max
- 40.55%
- CW
- 21.82%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
ROK
Capital Goods industry group
38.73%
- Max
- 40.55%
- ROK
- 38.73%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
For every dollar of sales, both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 14.86% and Rockwell Automation (ROK) at 15.68% retain more as net profit than most peers, landing in the top net margin quartile of their industries.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
14.86%
- Max
- 27.47%
- CW
- 14.86%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
ROK
Capital Goods industry group
15.68%
- Max
- 27.47%
- ROK
- 15.68%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 19.87% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Rockwell Automation (ROK) at 14.75%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
19.87%
- Max
- 36.60%
- CW
- 19.87%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
ROK
Capital Goods industry group
14.75%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- ROK
- 14.75%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CW | ROK |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 21.82% | 38.73% |
| ROA (TTM) | 8.90% | 9.32% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 14.86% | 15.68% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 19.87% | 14.75% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 38.07% | 48.95% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Only one side can be read here: Curtiss-Wright (CW) reports revenue growth of 12.08%, ranked against its industry; Rockwell Automation (ROK) has no revenue growth figure this period.
EPS Growth
Rockwell Automation (ROK) at 63.49% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 21.99% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for ROK.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CW | ROK |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 12.08% | -- |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 11.01% | -- |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 21.99% | 63.49% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 19.09% | 1.62% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Rockwell Automation (ROK) at 2.11 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 1.42 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for CW.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
1.42
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- CW
- 1.42
- Min
- 0.36
ROK
Capital Goods industry group
2.11
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- ROK
- 2.11
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 0.45 and Rockwell Automation (ROK) at 1.00 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
0.45
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- CW
- 0.45
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
ROK
Capital Goods industry group
1.00
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- ROK
- 1.00
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CW | ROK |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.42 | 2.11 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.45 | 1.00 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.00 | 1.58 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Rockwell Automation (ROK) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Curtiss-Wright (CW) reports a yield of 0.23%, ranking against industry peers normally.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
0.23%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- CW
- 0.23%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
ROK
Capital Goods industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- ROK
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 6.67% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Rockwell Automation (ROK) at 51.03% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
6.67%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- CW
- 6.67%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
ROK
Capital Goods industry group
51.03%
- Max
- 67.39%
- ROK
- 51.03%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CW | ROK |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.23% | 0.00% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 6.67% | 51.03% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 30.92 and Rockwell Automation (ROK) at 29.97 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
30.92
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- CW
- 30.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
ROK
Capital Goods industry group
29.97
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- ROK
- 29.97
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 4.50 and Rockwell Automation (ROK) at 4.65 command a richer price per dollar of sales than most peers, sitting in the upper P/S ratio quartile of their industries.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
4.50
- Max
- 7.54
- CW
- 4.50
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
ROK
Capital Goods industry group
4.65
- Max
- 7.54
- ROK
- 4.65
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Both look rich against book: Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 6.64 sits in the upper P/B ratio quartile, and Rockwell Automation (ROK) at 11.76 prices even higher, above its industry range.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
6.64
- Max
- 9.66
- CW
- 6.64
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
ROK
Capital Goods industry group
11.76
- ROK
- 11.76
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CW | ROK |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 30.92 | 29.97 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 4.50 | 4.65 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 6.64 | 11.76 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 2.86% | -1.13% |