CW vs. LECO: Curtiss-Wright vs. Lincoln Electric Stock Comparison
How do Curtiss-Wright (CW) and Lincoln Electric (LECO) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Curtiss-Wright (CW) and Lincoln Electric (LECO) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but CW is classified in Aerospace & Defense while LECO is classified in Machinery.
| Profile Item | CW | LECO |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Curtiss-Wright Corporation | Lincoln Electric Holdings, Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Machinery |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Industrial Machinery & Supplies & Components |
| Market Capitalization | 16.81 billion USD | 14.91 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | Nasdaq |
| Listing Date | March 17, 1980 | April 7, 1994 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CW | LECO |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -15.83% | 27.30% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 33.49% | 17.31% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 29.54% | 16.33% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | CW | LECO |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 38.26% | 31.13% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.93 | 1.17 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -45.25% | -34.29% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 427.49K | 409.99K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CW | LECO |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.53 | 0.74 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.71 | 1.11 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 21.82% and Lincoln Electric (LECO) at 38.75% sit in the top peer quartile for ROE, suggesting each generates more profit from shareholders’ equity than typical industry peers.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
21.82%
- Max
- 40.55%
- CW
- 21.82%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
LECO
Capital Goods industry group
38.75%
- Max
- 40.55%
- LECO
- 38.75%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
For every dollar of sales, both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 14.86% and Lincoln Electric (LECO) at 12.40% retain more as net profit than most peers, landing in the top net margin quartile of their industries.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
14.86%
- Max
- 27.47%
- CW
- 14.86%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
LECO
Capital Goods industry group
12.40%
- Max
- 27.47%
- LECO
- 12.40%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 19.87% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Lincoln Electric (LECO) at 18.29%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
19.87%
- Max
- 36.60%
- CW
- 19.87%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
LECO
Capital Goods industry group
18.29%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- LECO
- 18.29%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CW | LECO |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 21.82% | 38.75% |
| ROA (TTM) | 8.90% | 13.32% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 14.86% | 12.40% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 19.87% | 18.29% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 38.07% | 35.54% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 12.08% and Lincoln Electric (LECO) at 5.60% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 21.99% and Lincoln Electric (LECO) at 14.36% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CW | LECO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 12.08% | 5.60% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 11.01% | 4.02% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 21.99% | 14.36% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 19.09% | 5.05% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Lincoln Electric (LECO) at 1.91 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 1.42 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for CW.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
1.42
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- CW
- 1.42
- Min
- 0.36
LECO
Capital Goods industry group
1.91
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- LECO
- 1.91
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 0.45 and Lincoln Electric (LECO) at 0.78 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
0.45
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- CW
- 0.45
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
LECO
Capital Goods industry group
0.78
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- LECO
- 0.78
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CW | LECO |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.42 | 1.91 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.45 | 0.78 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Lincoln Electric (LECO) at 1.16% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 0.23% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, LECO the richer one.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
0.23%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- CW
- 0.23%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
LECO
Capital Goods industry group
1.16%
- Max
- 2.66%
- LECO
- 1.16%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 6.67% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Lincoln Electric (LECO) at 30.30% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
6.67%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- CW
- 6.67%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
LECO
Capital Goods industry group
30.30%
- Max
- 67.39%
- LECO
- 30.30%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CW | LECO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.23% | 1.16% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 6.67% | 30.30% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 30.92 and Lincoln Electric (LECO) at 26.40 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
30.92
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- CW
- 30.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
LECO
Capital Goods industry group
26.40
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- LECO
- 26.40
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Lincoln Electric (LECO) at 3.21 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 4.50 sits in the pricier quartile — CW costs more per dollar of sales.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
4.50
- Max
- 7.54
- CW
- 4.50
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
LECO
Capital Goods industry group
3.21
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- LECO
- 3.21
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 6.64 and Lincoln Electric (LECO) at 9.59 carry a premium to book value versus peers, sitting in the upper P/B ratio quartile of their industries.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
6.64
- Max
- 9.66
- CW
- 6.64
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
LECO
Capital Goods industry group
9.59
- Max
- 9.66
- LECO
- 9.59
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CW | LECO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 30.92 | 26.40 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 4.50 | 3.21 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 6.64 | 9.59 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 2.86% | 2.68% |