CW vs. EMR: Curtiss-Wright vs. Emerson Electric Stock Comparison
How do Curtiss-Wright (CW) and Emerson Electric (EMR) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Curtiss-Wright (CW) and Emerson Electric (EMR) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but CW is classified in Aerospace & Defense while EMR is classified in Electrical Equipment.
| Profile Item | CW | EMR |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Curtiss-Wright Corporation | Emerson Electric Co. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Electrical Equipment |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Electrical Components & Equipment |
| Market Capitalization | 16.81 billion USD | 90.56 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | March 17, 1980 | June 1, 1972 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CW | EMR |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -15.83% | 34.39% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 33.49% | 28.46% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 29.54% | 14.17% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | CW | EMR |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 38.26% | 32.47% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.93 | 1.20 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -45.25% | -29.61% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 427.49K | 2.61M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CW | EMR |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.53 | 0.93 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.71 | 1.37 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 21.82% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Emerson Electric (EMR) at 13.12% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for CW.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
21.82%
- Max
- 40.55%
- CW
- 21.82%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
EMR
Capital Goods industry group
13.12%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- EMR
- 13.12%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
For every dollar of sales, both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 14.86% and Emerson Electric (EMR) at 14.18% retain more as net profit than most peers, landing in the top net margin quartile of their industries.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
14.86%
- Max
- 27.47%
- CW
- 14.86%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
EMR
Capital Goods industry group
14.18%
- Max
- 27.47%
- EMR
- 14.18%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 19.87% and Emerson Electric (EMR) at 25.90% convert sales into operating profit at a top-quartile rate, pointing to tighter cost discipline before financing and tax.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
19.87%
- Max
- 36.60%
- CW
- 19.87%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
EMR
Capital Goods industry group
25.90%
- Max
- 36.60%
- EMR
- 25.90%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CW | EMR |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 21.82% | 13.12% |
| ROA (TTM) | 8.90% | 5.98% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 14.86% | 14.18% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 19.87% | 25.90% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 38.07% | 53.36% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Only one side can be read here: Curtiss-Wright (CW) reports revenue growth of 12.08%, ranked against its industry; Emerson Electric (EMR) has no revenue growth figure this period.
EPS Growth
Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 21.99% and Emerson Electric (EMR) at 18.56% land near their industries' usual EPS growth ranges, so bottom-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CW | EMR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 12.08% | -- |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 11.01% | -- |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 21.99% | 18.56% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 19.09% | -40.62% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 1.42 and Emerson Electric (EMR) at 0.94 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
1.42
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- CW
- 1.42
- Min
- 0.36
EMR
Capital Goods industry group
0.94
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- EMR
- 0.94
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 0.45 and Emerson Electric (EMR) at 0.59 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
0.45
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- CW
- 0.45
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
EMR
Capital Goods industry group
0.59
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- EMR
- 0.59
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CW | EMR |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.42 | 0.94 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.45 | 0.59 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.00 | 1.89 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Emerson Electric (EMR) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Curtiss-Wright (CW) reports a yield of 0.23%, ranking against industry peers normally.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
0.23%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- CW
- 0.23%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
EMR
Capital Goods industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- EMR
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 6.67% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Emerson Electric (EMR) at 48.51% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
6.67%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- CW
- 6.67%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
EMR
Capital Goods industry group
48.51%
- Max
- 67.39%
- EMR
- 48.51%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CW | EMR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.23% | 0.00% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 6.67% | 48.51% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 30.92 and Emerson Electric (EMR) at 33.89 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
30.92
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- CW
- 30.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
EMR
Capital Goods industry group
33.89
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- EMR
- 33.89
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 4.50 and Emerson Electric (EMR) at 4.77 command a richer price per dollar of sales than most peers, sitting in the upper P/S ratio quartile of their industries.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
4.50
- Max
- 7.54
- CW
- 4.50
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
EMR
Capital Goods industry group
4.77
- Max
- 7.54
- EMR
- 4.77
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Emerson Electric (EMR) at 4.38 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 6.64 carries an above-peer premium to book — CW is pricier on assets.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
6.64
- Max
- 9.66
- CW
- 6.64
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
EMR
Capital Goods industry group
4.38
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- EMR
- 4.38
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CW | EMR |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 30.92 | 33.89 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 4.50 | 4.77 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 6.64 | 4.38 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 2.86% | 3.85% |