CW vs. EME: Curtiss-Wright vs. EMCOR Stock Comparison
How do Curtiss-Wright (CW) and EMCOR (EME) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Curtiss-Wright (CW) and EMCOR (EME) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but CW is classified in Aerospace & Defense while EME is classified in Construction & Engineering.
| Profile Item | CW | EME |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Curtiss-Wright Corporation | EMCOR Group, Inc. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Construction & Engineering |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Aerospace & Defense | Construction & Engineering |
| Market Capitalization | 16.81 billion USD | 26.64 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | March 17, 1980 | January 10, 1995 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CW | EME |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -15.83% | 0.07% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 33.49% | 46.16% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 29.54% | 38.01% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | CW | EME |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 38.26% | 43.79% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.93 | 1.17 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -45.25% | -36.85% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 427.49K | 402.73K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CW | EME |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.53 | -0.10 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.71 | -0.14 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 21.82% and EMCOR (EME) at 40.55% sit in the top peer quartile for ROE, suggesting each generates more profit from shareholders’ equity than typical industry peers.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
21.82%
- Max
- 40.55%
- CW
- 21.82%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
EME
Capital Goods industry group
40.55%
- EME
- 40.55%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 14.86% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of EMCOR (EME) at 7.78%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
14.86%
- Max
- 27.47%
- CW
- 14.86%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
EME
Capital Goods industry group
7.78%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- EME
- 7.78%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 19.87% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of EMCOR (EME) at 10.46%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
19.87%
- Max
- 36.60%
- CW
- 19.87%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
EME
Capital Goods industry group
10.46%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- EME
- 10.46%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CW | EME |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 21.82% | 40.55% |
| ROA (TTM) | 8.90% | 12.33% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 14.86% | 7.78% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 19.87% | 10.46% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 38.07% | 19.59% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 12.08% and EMCOR (EME) at 16.62% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.
EPS Growth
EMCOR (EME) at 30.99% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 21.99% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for EME.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CW | EME |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 12.08% | 16.62% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 11.01% | 15.32% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 21.99% | 30.99% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 19.09% | 51.54% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 1.42 and EMCOR (EME) at 1.17 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
1.42
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- CW
- 1.42
- Min
- 0.36
EME
Capital Goods industry group
1.17
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- EME
- 1.17
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
EMCOR (EME) at 0.13 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 0.45 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
0.45
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- CW
- 0.45
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
EME
Capital Goods industry group
0.13
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- EME
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CW | EME |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.42 | 1.17 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.45 | 0.13 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.00 | -0.10 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 0.23% and EMCOR (EME) at 0.07% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
0.23%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- CW
- 0.23%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
EME
Capital Goods industry group
0.07%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- EME
- 0.07%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 6.67% and EMCOR (EME) at 4.19% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
6.67%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- CW
- 6.67%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
EME
Capital Goods industry group
4.19%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- EME
- 4.19%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CW | EME |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.23% | 0.07% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 6.67% | 4.19% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
EMCOR (EME) at 17.59 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 30.92 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for EME, though growth and earnings durability still matter.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
30.92
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- CW
- 30.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
EME
Capital Goods industry group
17.59
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- EME
- 17.59
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
EMCOR (EME) at 1.34 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 4.50 sits in the pricier quartile — CW costs more per dollar of sales.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
4.50
- Max
- 7.54
- CW
- 4.50
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
EME
Capital Goods industry group
1.34
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- EME
- 1.34
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Both Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 6.64 and EMCOR (EME) at 6.26 carry a premium to book value versus peers, sitting in the upper P/B ratio quartile of their industries.
CW
Capital Goods industry group
6.64
- Max
- 9.66
- CW
- 6.64
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
EME
Capital Goods industry group
6.26
- Max
- 9.66
- EME
- 6.26
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CW | EME |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 30.92 | 17.59 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 4.50 | 1.34 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 6.64 | 6.26 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 2.86% | 4.82% |