CVE vs. YPF: Cenovus Energy vs. YPF Stock Comparison
How do Cenovus Energy (CVE) and YPF (YPF) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Cenovus Energy (CVE) and YPF (YPF) are both classified in the Integrated Oil & Gas sub-industry within the broader Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, placing them in the closest GICS peer bucket.
Cenovus Energy (CVE) trades as ordinary local shares, while YPF (YPF) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.
| Profile Item | CVE | YPF |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Cenovus Energy Inc. | YPF Sociedad Anónima Sponsored ADR |
| Country/Region | Canada | Argentina |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Integrated Oil & Gas | Integrated Oil & Gas |
| Market Capitalization | 49.61 billion USD | 15.16 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | November 17, 2009 | June 29, 1993 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | ADR |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CVE | YPF |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 60.99% | 4.12% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 19.41% | 55.92% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 18.63% | 52.62% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
YPF (YPF) has an aggressive beta of 1.38, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Cenovus Energy (CVE) is defensive at 0.43 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.
| Metric | CVE | YPF |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 37.47% | 39.02% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.43 | 1.38 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -53.51% | -48.79% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 6.90M | 1.23M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CVE | YPF |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 1.51 | -0.00 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 2.20 | -0.01 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 27.44% sits in the top ROE quartile, while YPF (YPF) at 17.41% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for CVE.
CVE
Energy industry group
27.44%
- Max
- 53.85%
- CVE
- 27.44%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
YPF
Energy industry group
17.41%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- YPF
- 17.41%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 15.42% and YPF (YPF) at 9.76% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
CVE
Energy industry group
15.42%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- CVE
- 15.42%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
YPF
Energy industry group
9.76%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- Median
- 10.10%
- YPF
- 9.76%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 26.58% and YPF (YPF) at 29.16% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
CVE
Energy industry group
26.58%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- CVE
- 26.58%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
YPF
Energy industry group
29.16%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- YPF
- 29.16%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CVE | YPF |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 27.44% | 17.41% |
| ROA (TTM) | 12.05% | 9.92% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 15.42% | 9.76% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 26.58% | 29.16% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 33.92% | 38.74% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
YPF (YPF) at -4.39% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Cenovus Energy (CVE) at -8.62% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 28.74% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while YPF (YPF) at -135.23% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in earnings momentum.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CVE | YPF |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -8.62% | -4.39% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -9.75% | -0.28% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 28.74% | -135.23% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -12.42% | -- |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 1.64 and YPF (YPF) at 1.24 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.
CVE
Energy industry group
1.64
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- CVE
- 1.64
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
YPF
Energy industry group
1.24
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- YPF
- 1.24
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 0.33 and YPF (YPF) at 0.79 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
CVE
Energy industry group
0.33
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- CVE
- 0.33
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
YPF
Energy industry group
0.79
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- YPF
- 0.79
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CVE | YPF |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.64 | 1.24 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.33 | 0.79 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.35 | 0.96 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
YPF (YPF) pays no dividend (yield 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Cenovus Energy (CVE) reports a yield of 3.04%, ranking against industry peers normally.
CVE
Energy industry group
3.04%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- CVE
- 3.04%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
YPF
Energy industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 1.71%
- YPF
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
YPF (YPF) pays no dividend (payout 0.00%) — it may be reinvesting, using buybacks, or simply not returning cash through dividends. Meanwhile Cenovus Energy (CVE) reports a payout of 22.84%, ranking against industry peers normally.
CVE
Energy industry group
22.84%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- CVE
- 22.84%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
YPF
Energy industry group
0.00%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- YPF
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CVE | YPF |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 3.04% | 0.00% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 22.84% | 0.00% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
YPF (YPF) at 7.12 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 10.56 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for YPF, though growth and earnings durability still matter.
CVE
Energy industry group
10.56
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- CVE
- 10.56
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
YPF
Energy industry group
7.12
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- YPF
- 7.12
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 0.88 and YPF (YPF) at 0.00 fetch a relatively low price per dollar of sales, landing in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile of their industries.
CVE
Energy industry group
0.88
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- CVE
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
YPF
Energy industry group
0.00
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- YPF
- 0.00
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 1.98 and YPF (YPF) at 1.12 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
CVE
Energy industry group
1.98
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- CVE
- 1.98
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
YPF
Energy industry group
1.12
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- YPF
- 1.12
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CVE | YPF |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 10.56 | 7.12 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 0.88 | 0.00 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.98 | 1.12 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 20.71% | 5,553.69% |