CVE vs. TPL: Cenovus Energy vs. Texas Pacific Land Stock Comparison
How do Cenovus Energy (CVE) and Texas Pacific Land (TPL) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Cenovus Energy (CVE) and Texas Pacific Land (TPL) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though CVE is classified under Integrated Oil & Gas while TPL falls under Oil & Gas Exploration & Production.
| Profile Item | CVE | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Cenovus Energy Inc. | Texas Pacific Land Corporation |
| Country/Region | Canada | United States |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Integrated Oil & Gas | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Capitalization | 49.61 billion USD | 18.79 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | November 17, 2009 | March 17, 1980 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CVE | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 60.99% | -14.10% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 19.41% | 16.13% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 18.63% | 13.42% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | CVE | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 37.47% | 49.74% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.43 | 0.62 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -53.51% | -52.50% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 6.90M | 380.93K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CVE | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 1.51 | -0.37 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 2.20 | -0.50 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 27.44% and Texas Pacific Land (TPL) at 37.07% sit in the top peer quartile for ROE, suggesting each generates more profit from shareholders’ equity than typical industry peers.
CVE
Energy industry group
27.44%
- Max
- 53.85%
- CVE
- 27.44%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
TPL
Energy industry group
37.07%
- Max
- 53.85%
- TPL
- 37.07%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
Texas Pacific Land (TPL) at 60.71% converts revenue to bottom-line profit above its industry’s benchmark range, while Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 15.42% keeps roughly the typical share for its industry.
CVE
Energy industry group
15.42%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- CVE
- 15.42%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
TPL
Energy industry group
60.71%
- TPL
- 60.71%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Texas Pacific Land (TPL) at 76.20% turns sales into operating profit above its industry’s benchmark range, while Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 26.58% operates around its industry’s norm.
CVE
Energy industry group
26.58%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- CVE
- 26.58%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
TPL
Energy industry group
76.20%
- TPL
- 76.20%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CVE | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 27.44% | 37.07% |
| ROA (TTM) | 12.05% | 26.08% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 15.42% | 60.71% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 26.58% | 76.20% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 33.92% | 94.09% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Texas Pacific Land (TPL) at 13.09% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Cenovus Energy (CVE) at -8.62% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 28.74% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Texas Pacific Land (TPL) at 6.04% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for CVE.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CVE | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -8.62% | 13.09% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -9.75% | 6.15% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 28.74% | 6.04% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -12.42% | 2.78% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 1.64 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Texas Pacific Land (TPL) at 5.41 sits above its industry’s typical mid-range — comfortable liquidity, though possibly with more idle current assets relative to peers.
CVE
Energy industry group
1.64
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- CVE
- 1.64
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
TPL
Energy industry group
5.41
- TPL
- 5.41
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Texas Pacific Land (TPL) at 0.01 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 0.33 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.
CVE
Energy industry group
0.33
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- CVE
- 0.33
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
TPL
Energy industry group
0.01
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- TPL
- 0.01
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CVE | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.64 | 5.41 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.33 | 0.01 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.35 | -0.44 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 3.04% and Texas Pacific Land (TPL) at 0.86% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
CVE
Energy industry group
3.04%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- CVE
- 3.04%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
TPL
Energy industry group
0.86%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 1.71%
- TPL
- 0.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 22.84% and Texas Pacific Land (TPL) at 27.42% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
CVE
Energy industry group
22.84%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- CVE
- 22.84%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
TPL
Energy industry group
27.42%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- TPL
- 27.42%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CVE | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 3.04% | 0.86% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 22.84% | 27.42% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 10.56 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while Texas Pacific Land (TPL) at 32.00 sits in the richer quartile — TPL needs stronger growth or earnings quality to justify the premium.
CVE
Energy industry group
10.56
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- CVE
- 10.56
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
TPL
Energy industry group
32.00
- Max
- 39.54
- TPL
- 32.00
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 0.88 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Texas Pacific Land (TPL) at 19.41 prices above its industry range — a wide gap in sales valuation between them.
CVE
Energy industry group
0.88
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- CVE
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
TPL
Energy industry group
19.41
- TPL
- 19.41
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 1.98 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Texas Pacific Land (TPL) at 10.42 prices above its benchmark range — TPL looks rich relative to book.
CVE
Energy industry group
1.98
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- CVE
- 1.98
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
TPL
Energy industry group
10.42
- TPL
- 10.42
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CVE | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 10.56 | 32.00 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 0.88 | 19.41 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.98 | 10.42 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 20.71% | 0.43% |