CVE vs. PR: Cenovus Energy vs. Permian Resources Stock Comparison
How do Cenovus Energy (CVE) and Permian Resources (PR) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Cenovus Energy (CVE) and Permian Resources (PR) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though CVE is classified under Integrated Oil & Gas while PR falls under Oil & Gas Exploration & Production.
| Profile Item | CVE | PR |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Cenovus Energy Inc. | Permian Resources Corp Class A Common Stock |
| Country/Region | Canada | United States |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Integrated Oil & Gas | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Capitalization | 49.61 billion USD | 18.24 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | November 17, 2009 | April 15, 2016 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CVE | PR |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 60.99% | 69.18% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 19.41% | 23.63% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 18.63% | 26.41% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | CVE | PR |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 37.47% | 34.59% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.43 | 0.65 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -53.51% | -44.31% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 6.90M | 9.78M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CVE | PR |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 1.51 | 1.88 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 2.20 | 2.73 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 27.44% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Permian Resources (PR) at 13.95% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for CVE.
CVE
Energy industry group
27.44%
- Max
- 53.85%
- CVE
- 27.44%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
PR
Energy industry group
13.95%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- PR
- 13.95%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
Permian Resources (PR) at 25.04% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 15.42%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
CVE
Energy industry group
15.42%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- CVE
- 15.42%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
PR
Energy industry group
25.04%
- Max
- 56.92%
- PR
- 25.04%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 26.58% and Permian Resources (PR) at 29.59% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
CVE
Energy industry group
26.58%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- CVE
- 26.58%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
PR
Energy industry group
29.59%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- PR
- 29.59%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CVE | PR |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 27.44% | 13.95% |
| ROA (TTM) | 12.05% | 7.73% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 15.42% | 25.04% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 26.58% | 29.59% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 33.92% | 77.14% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Permian Resources (PR) at 1.29% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Cenovus Energy (CVE) at -8.62% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 28.74% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Permian Resources (PR) at -11.72% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for CVE.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CVE | PR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -8.62% | 1.29% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -9.75% | 33.45% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 28.74% | -11.72% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -12.42% | -7.36% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 1.64 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Permian Resources (PR) at 0.50 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for PR.
CVE
Energy industry group
1.64
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- CVE
- 1.64
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
PR
Energy industry group
0.50
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- PR
- 0.50
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Permian Resources (PR) at 0.26 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 0.33 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.
CVE
Energy industry group
0.33
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- CVE
- 0.33
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
PR
Energy industry group
0.26
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- PR
- 0.26
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CVE | PR |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.64 | 0.50 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.33 | 0.26 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.35 | 0.71 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 3.04% and Permian Resources (PR) at 2.95% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
CVE
Energy industry group
3.04%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- CVE
- 3.04%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
PR
Energy industry group
2.95%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- PR
- 2.95%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 22.84% and Permian Resources (PR) at 32.64% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
CVE
Energy industry group
22.84%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- CVE
- 22.84%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
PR
Energy industry group
32.64%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- PR
- 32.64%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CVE | PR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 3.04% | 2.95% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 22.84% | 32.64% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 10.56 and Permian Resources (PR) at 11.27 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
CVE
Energy industry group
10.56
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- CVE
- 10.56
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
PR
Energy industry group
11.27
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- PR
- 11.27
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 0.88 looks cheap on sales in the lower P/S ratio quartile, while Permian Resources (PR) at 2.86 looks rich in the upper quartile — a clear gap in price per dollar of revenue.
CVE
Energy industry group
0.88
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- CVE
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
PR
Energy industry group
2.86
- Max
- 5.40
- PR
- 2.86
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 1.98 and Permian Resources (PR) at 1.48 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
CVE
Energy industry group
1.98
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- CVE
- 1.98
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
PR
Energy industry group
1.48
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- PR
- 1.48
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CVE | PR |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 10.56 | 11.27 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 0.88 | 2.86 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.98 | 1.48 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 20.71% | 2.10% |