CVE vs. OKE: Cenovus Energy vs. ONEOK Stock Comparison
How do Cenovus Energy (CVE) and ONEOK (OKE) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Cenovus Energy (CVE) and ONEOK (OKE) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though CVE is classified under Integrated Oil & Gas while OKE falls under Oil & Gas Storage & Transportation.
| Profile Item | CVE | OKE |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Cenovus Energy Inc. | ONEOK, Inc. |
| Country/Region | Canada | United States |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Integrated Oil & Gas | Oil & Gas Storage & Transportation |
| Market Capitalization | 49.61 billion USD | 53.71 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | November 17, 2009 | October 1, 1980 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CVE | OKE |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 60.99% | 33.00% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 19.41% | 16.19% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 18.63% | 11.76% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | CVE | OKE |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 37.47% | 27.56% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.43 | 0.79 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -53.51% | -42.17% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 6.90M | 3.38M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CVE | OKE |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 1.51 | 1.04 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 2.20 | 1.50 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 27.44% sits in the top ROE quartile, while ONEOK (OKE) at 15.02% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for CVE.
CVE
Energy industry group
27.44%
- Max
- 53.85%
- CVE
- 27.44%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
OKE
Energy industry group
15.02%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- OKE
- 15.02%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 15.42% and ONEOK (OKE) at 9.42% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
CVE
Energy industry group
15.42%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- CVE
- 15.42%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
OKE
Energy industry group
9.42%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- Median
- 10.10%
- OKE
- 9.42%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 26.58% and ONEOK (OKE) at 12.71% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
CVE
Energy industry group
26.58%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- CVE
- 26.58%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
OKE
Energy industry group
12.71%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- Median
- 18.73%
- OKE
- 12.71%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CVE | OKE |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 27.44% | 15.02% |
| ROA (TTM) | 12.05% | 5.46% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 15.42% | 9.42% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 26.58% | 12.71% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 33.92% | 25.20% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
ONEOK (OKE) at 54.99% delivers above-range revenue growth, while Cenovus Energy (CVE) at -8.62% falls into the bottom quartile — a wide split in revenue momentum.
EPS Growth
Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 28.74% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while ONEOK (OKE) at 4.84% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for CVE.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CVE | OKE |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -8.62% | 54.99% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -9.75% | 14.53% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 28.74% | 4.84% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -12.42% | 12.17% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 1.64 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while ONEOK (OKE) at 0.84 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for OKE.
CVE
Energy industry group
1.64
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- CVE
- 1.64
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
OKE
Energy industry group
0.84
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- OKE
- 0.84
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 0.33 and ONEOK (OKE) at 0.88 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
CVE
Energy industry group
0.33
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- CVE
- 0.33
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
OKE
Energy industry group
0.88
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- OKE
- 0.88
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CVE | OKE |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.64 | 0.84 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.33 | 0.88 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.35 | 3.68 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
ONEOK (OKE) at 4.96% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 3.04% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, OKE the richer one.
CVE
Energy industry group
3.04%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- CVE
- 3.04%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
OKE
Energy industry group
4.96%
- Max
- 8.57%
- OKE
- 4.96%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 22.84% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while ONEOK (OKE) at 65.84% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
CVE
Energy industry group
22.84%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- CVE
- 22.84%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
OKE
Energy industry group
65.84%
- Max
- 133.24%
- OKE
- 65.84%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CVE | OKE |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 3.04% | 4.96% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 22.84% | 65.84% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 10.56 and ONEOK (OKE) at 13.23 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
CVE
Energy industry group
10.56
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- CVE
- 10.56
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
OKE
Energy industry group
13.23
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- OKE
- 13.23
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 0.88 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while ONEOK (OKE) at 1.24 prices around its industry’s middle — CVE costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.
CVE
Energy industry group
0.88
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- CVE
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
OKE
Energy industry group
1.24
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- OKE
- 1.24
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 1.98 and ONEOK (OKE) at 2.30 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
CVE
Energy industry group
1.98
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- CVE
- 1.98
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
OKE
Energy industry group
2.30
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- OKE
- 2.30
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CVE | OKE |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 10.56 | 13.23 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 0.88 | 1.24 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.98 | 2.30 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 20.71% | 1.44% |