CVE vs. LNG: Cenovus Energy vs. Cheniere Energy Stock Comparison
How do Cenovus Energy (CVE) and Cheniere Energy (LNG) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Cenovus Energy (CVE) and Cheniere Energy (LNG) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though CVE is classified under Integrated Oil & Gas while LNG falls under Oil & Gas Storage & Transportation.
| Profile Item | CVE | LNG |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Cenovus Energy Inc. | Cheniere Energy Inc. |
| Country/Region | Canada | United States |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Integrated Oil & Gas | Oil & Gas Storage & Transportation |
| Market Capitalization | 49.61 billion USD | 56.76 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | November 17, 2009 | April 4, 1994 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CVE | LNG |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 60.99% | 36.89% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 19.41% | 19.36% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 18.63% | 22.59% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | CVE | LNG |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 37.47% | 31.41% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.43 | 0.06 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -53.51% | -24.87% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 6.90M | 2.00M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CVE | LNG |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 1.51 | 1.04 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 2.20 | 1.54 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 27.44% and Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 39.68% sit in the top peer quartile for ROE, suggesting each generates more profit from shareholders’ equity than typical industry peers.
CVE
Energy industry group
27.44%
- Max
- 53.85%
- CVE
- 27.44%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
LNG
Energy industry group
39.68%
- Max
- 53.85%
- LNG
- 39.68%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 15.42% and Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 13.40% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
CVE
Energy industry group
15.42%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- CVE
- 15.42%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
LNG
Energy industry group
13.40%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- LNG
- 13.40%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 26.58% and Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 30.82% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
CVE
Energy industry group
26.58%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- CVE
- 26.58%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
LNG
Energy industry group
30.82%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- LNG
- 30.82%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CVE | LNG |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 27.44% | 39.68% |
| ROA (TTM) | 12.05% | 8.61% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 15.42% | 13.40% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 26.58% | 30.82% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 33.92% | 34.89% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 27.21% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Cenovus Energy (CVE) at -8.62% is in the bottom quartile, showing a clear gap in revenue momentum.
EPS Growth
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 28.74% and Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 69.93% sit in the top peer quartile for EPS growth, so each is compounding per-share earnings faster than typical industry peers.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CVE | LNG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -8.62% | 27.21% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -9.75% | -15.77% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 28.74% | 69.93% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -12.42% | 62.34% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 1.64 and Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 0.90 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.
CVE
Energy industry group
1.64
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- CVE
- 1.64
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
LNG
Energy industry group
0.90
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- LNG
- 0.90
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 0.33 is near its industry mid-range for debt-to-equity ratio, while Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 2.31 sits above its benchmark range, pointing to a heavier debt load relative to equity.
CVE
Energy industry group
0.33
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- CVE
- 0.33
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
LNG
Energy industry group
2.31
- LNG
- 2.31
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CVE | LNG |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.64 | 0.90 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.33 | 2.31 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.35 | 3.26 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 3.04% and Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 0.82% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
CVE
Energy industry group
3.04%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- CVE
- 3.04%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
LNG
Energy industry group
0.82%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 1.71%
- LNG
- 0.82%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 22.84% and Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 15.80% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
CVE
Energy industry group
22.84%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- CVE
- 22.84%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
LNG
Energy industry group
15.80%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- LNG
- 15.80%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CVE | LNG |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 3.04% | 0.82% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 22.84% | 15.80% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 10.56 and Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 19.78 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
CVE
Energy industry group
10.56
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- CVE
- 10.56
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
LNG
Energy industry group
19.78
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- LNG
- 19.78
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 0.88 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 2.50 prices around its industry’s middle — CVE costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.
CVE
Energy industry group
0.88
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- CVE
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
LNG
Energy industry group
2.50
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- LNG
- 2.50
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 1.98 sits near its industry’s typical P/B ratio, while Cheniere Energy (LNG) at 8.70 prices above its benchmark range — LNG looks rich relative to book.
CVE
Energy industry group
1.98
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- CVE
- 1.98
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
LNG
Energy industry group
8.70
- LNG
- 8.70
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CVE | LNG |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 10.56 | 19.78 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 0.88 | 2.50 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.98 | 8.70 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 20.71% | 3.17% |