CVE vs. KMI: Cenovus Energy vs. Kinder Morgan Stock Comparison
How do Cenovus Energy (CVE) and Kinder Morgan (KMI) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Cenovus Energy (CVE) and Kinder Morgan (KMI) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though CVE is classified under Integrated Oil & Gas while KMI falls under Oil & Gas Storage & Transportation.
| Profile Item | CVE | KMI |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Cenovus Energy Inc. | Kinder Morgan Inc. |
| Country/Region | Canada | United States |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Integrated Oil & Gas | Oil & Gas Storage & Transportation |
| Market Capitalization | 49.61 billion USD | 66.74 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | November 17, 2009 | February 11, 2011 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CVE | KMI |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 60.99% | 19.50% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 19.41% | 29.33% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 18.63% | 18.80% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | CVE | KMI |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 37.47% | 22.00% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.43 | 0.60 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -53.51% | -20.31% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 6.90M | 12.88M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CVE | KMI |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 1.51 | 0.69 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 2.20 | 1.01 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 27.44% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Kinder Morgan (KMI) at 11.43% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for CVE.
CVE
Energy industry group
27.44%
- Max
- 53.85%
- CVE
- 27.44%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
KMI
Energy industry group
11.43%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- KMI
- 11.43%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 15.42% and Kinder Morgan (KMI) at 19.64% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
CVE
Energy industry group
15.42%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- CVE
- 15.42%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
KMI
Energy industry group
19.64%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- KMI
- 19.64%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 26.58% and Kinder Morgan (KMI) at 24.03% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
CVE
Energy industry group
26.58%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- CVE
- 26.58%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
KMI
Energy industry group
24.03%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- KMI
- 24.03%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CVE | KMI |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 27.44% | 11.43% |
| ROA (TTM) | 12.05% | 4.44% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 15.42% | 19.64% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 26.58% | 24.03% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 33.92% | 48.65% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Kinder Morgan (KMI) at 12.17% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Cenovus Energy (CVE) at -8.62% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 28.74% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Kinder Morgan (KMI) at 17.09% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for CVE.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CVE | KMI |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -8.62% | 12.17% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -9.75% | -4.09% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 28.74% | 17.09% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -12.42% | 6.95% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 1.64 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Kinder Morgan (KMI) at 0.67 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for KMI.
CVE
Energy industry group
1.64
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- CVE
- 1.64
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
KMI
Energy industry group
0.67
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- KMI
- 0.67
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 0.33 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Kinder Morgan (KMI) at 1.02 uses more debt funding than most peers.
CVE
Energy industry group
0.33
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- CVE
- 0.33
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
KMI
Energy industry group
1.02
- Max
- 1.75
- KMI
- 1.02
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CVE | KMI |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.64 | 0.67 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.33 | 1.02 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.35 | 4.23 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Kinder Morgan (KMI) at 3.93% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 3.04% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, KMI the richer one.
CVE
Energy industry group
3.04%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- CVE
- 3.04%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
KMI
Energy industry group
3.93%
- Max
- 8.57%
- KMI
- 3.93%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 22.84% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Kinder Morgan (KMI) at 72.84% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
CVE
Energy industry group
22.84%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- CVE
- 22.84%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
KMI
Energy industry group
72.84%
- Max
- 133.24%
- KMI
- 72.84%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CVE | KMI |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 3.04% | 3.93% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 22.84% | 72.84% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 10.56 and Kinder Morgan (KMI) at 18.49 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
CVE
Energy industry group
10.56
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- CVE
- 10.56
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
KMI
Energy industry group
18.49
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- KMI
- 18.49
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 0.88 looks cheap on sales in the lower P/S ratio quartile, while Kinder Morgan (KMI) at 3.64 looks rich in the upper quartile — a clear gap in price per dollar of revenue.
CVE
Energy industry group
0.88
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- CVE
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
KMI
Energy industry group
3.64
- Max
- 5.40
- KMI
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 1.98 and Kinder Morgan (KMI) at 2.11 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
CVE
Energy industry group
1.98
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- CVE
- 1.98
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
KMI
Energy industry group
2.11
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- KMI
- 2.11
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CVE | KMI |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 10.56 | 18.49 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 0.88 | 3.64 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.98 | 2.11 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 20.71% | 1.61% |