CVE vs. HAL: Cenovus Energy vs. Halliburton Stock Comparison
How do Cenovus Energy (CVE) and Halliburton (HAL) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Cenovus Energy (CVE) and Halliburton (HAL) both fall under the Energy industry group, but CVE is classified in Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels while HAL is classified in Energy Equipment & Services.
| Profile Item | CVE | HAL |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Cenovus Energy Inc. | Halliburton Company |
| Country/Region | Canada | United States |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | Energy Equipment & Services |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Integrated Oil & Gas | Oil & Gas Equipment & Services |
| Market Capitalization | 49.61 billion USD | 26.34 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | November 17, 2009 | June 1, 1972 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CVE | HAL |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 60.99% | 18.66% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 19.41% | -3.16% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 18.63% | 7.11% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | CVE | HAL |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 37.47% | 33.27% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.43 | 0.77 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -53.51% | -54.01% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 6.90M | 10.27M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CVE | HAL |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 1.51 | 0.43 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 2.20 | 0.64 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 27.44% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Halliburton (HAL) at 18.78% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for CVE.
CVE
Energy industry group
27.44%
- Max
- 53.85%
- CVE
- 27.44%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
HAL
Energy industry group
18.78%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- HAL
- 18.78%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 15.42% and Halliburton (HAL) at 8.90% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
CVE
Energy industry group
15.42%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- CVE
- 15.42%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
HAL
Energy industry group
8.90%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- Median
- 10.10%
- HAL
- 8.90%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 26.58% and Halliburton (HAL) at 12.43% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
CVE
Energy industry group
26.58%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- CVE
- 26.58%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
HAL
Energy industry group
12.43%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- Median
- 18.73%
- HAL
- 12.43%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CVE | HAL |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 27.44% | 18.78% |
| ROA (TTM) | 12.05% | 7.23% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 15.42% | 8.90% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 26.58% | 12.43% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 33.92% | 14.83% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Halliburton (HAL) at -3.31% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Cenovus Energy (CVE) at -8.62% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 28.74% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Halliburton (HAL) at -47.00% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for CVE.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CVE | HAL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -8.62% | -3.31% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -9.75% | 3.01% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 28.74% | -47.00% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -12.42% | -4.83% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 1.64 and Halliburton (HAL) at 2.02 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.
CVE
Energy industry group
1.64
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- CVE
- 1.64
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
HAL
Energy industry group
2.02
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- HAL
- 2.02
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 0.33 and Halliburton (HAL) at 0.73 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
CVE
Energy industry group
0.33
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- CVE
- 0.33
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
HAL
Energy industry group
0.73
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- HAL
- 0.73
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CVE | HAL |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.64 | 2.02 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.33 | 0.73 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.35 | 1.54 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 3.04% and Halliburton (HAL) at 2.13% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
CVE
Energy industry group
3.04%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- CVE
- 3.04%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
HAL
Energy industry group
2.13%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- HAL
- 2.13%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 22.84% and Halliburton (HAL) at 28.57% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
CVE
Energy industry group
22.84%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- CVE
- 22.84%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
HAL
Energy industry group
28.57%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- HAL
- 28.57%
- Median
- 25.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CVE | HAL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 3.04% | 2.13% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 22.84% | 28.57% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 10.56 and Halliburton (HAL) at 13.38 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
CVE
Energy industry group
10.56
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- CVE
- 10.56
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
HAL
Energy industry group
13.38
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- HAL
- 13.38
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 0.88 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Halliburton (HAL) at 1.17 prices around its industry’s middle — CVE costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.
CVE
Energy industry group
0.88
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- CVE
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
HAL
Energy industry group
1.17
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- HAL
- 1.17
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
On P/B ratio, both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 1.98 and Halliburton (HAL) at 2.37 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.
CVE
Energy industry group
1.98
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- CVE
- 1.98
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
HAL
Energy industry group
2.37
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- HAL
- 2.37
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CVE | HAL |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 10.56 | 13.38 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 0.88 | 1.17 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.98 | 2.37 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 20.71% | 6.20% |