CVE vs. EXE: Cenovus Energy vs. Expand Energy Stock Comparison
How do Cenovus Energy (CVE) and Expand Energy (EXE) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Cenovus Energy (CVE) and Expand Energy (EXE) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though CVE is classified under Integrated Oil & Gas while EXE falls under Oil & Gas Exploration & Production.
| Profile Item | CVE | EXE |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Cenovus Energy Inc. | Expand Energy Corp |
| Country/Region | Canada | United States |
| GICS Sector | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry Group | Energy | Energy |
| GICS Industry | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels | Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Integrated Oil & Gas | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Capitalization | 49.61 billion USD | 19.54 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | Nasdaq |
| Listing Date | November 17, 2009 | February 10, 2021 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CVE | EXE |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 60.99% | -22.30% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 19.41% | 4.93% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 18.63% | 9.88% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | CVE | EXE |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 37.47% | 29.72% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.43 | 0.40 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -53.51% | -30.37% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 6.90M | 3.10M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CVE | EXE |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 1.51 | -0.89 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 2.20 | -1.27 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 27.44% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Expand Energy (EXE) at 14.62% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for CVE.
CVE
Energy industry group
27.44%
- Max
- 53.85%
- CVE
- 27.44%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
EXE
Energy industry group
14.62%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 24.79%
- EXE
- 14.62%
- Median
- 12.85%
- Q1
- 2.03%
- Min
- -29.09%
Net Margin (TTM)
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 15.42% and Expand Energy (EXE) at 21.26% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.
CVE
Energy industry group
15.42%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- CVE
- 15.42%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
EXE
Energy industry group
21.26%
- Max
- 56.92%
- Q3
- 22.92%
- EXE
- 21.26%
- Median
- 10.10%
- Q1
- 0.07%
- Min
- -27.38%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 26.58% and Expand Energy (EXE) at 23.18% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.
CVE
Energy industry group
26.58%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- CVE
- 26.58%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
EXE
Energy industry group
23.18%
- Max
- 71.31%
- Q3
- 33.75%
- EXE
- 23.18%
- Median
- 18.73%
- Q1
- 6.94%
- Min
- -24.52%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CVE | EXE |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 27.44% | 14.62% |
| ROA (TTM) | 12.05% | 8.17% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 15.42% | 21.26% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 26.58% | 23.18% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 33.92% | 45.86% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Expand Energy (EXE) at 188.77% delivers above-range revenue growth, while Cenovus Energy (CVE) at -8.62% falls into the bottom quartile — a wide split in revenue momentum.
EPS Growth
Only one side can be read here: Cenovus Energy (CVE) reports EPS growth of 28.74%, ranked against its industry; Expand Energy (EXE) has no EPS growth figure this period.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CVE | EXE |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | -8.62% | 188.77% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -9.75% | 2.13% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 28.74% | -- |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -12.42% | -39.01% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 1.64 and Expand Energy (EXE) at 0.90 carry current ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges, suggesting balanced short-term liquidity relative to peers.
CVE
Energy industry group
1.64
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- CVE
- 1.64
- Median
- 1.41
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
EXE
Energy industry group
0.90
- Max
- 3.64
- Q3
- 2.21
- Median
- 1.41
- EXE
- 0.90
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.24
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Expand Energy (EXE) at 0.24 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 0.33 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.
CVE
Energy industry group
0.33
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- CVE
- 0.33
- Q1
- 0.30
- Min
- 0.00
EXE
Energy industry group
0.24
- Max
- 1.75
- Q3
- 0.93
- Median
- 0.54
- Q1
- 0.30
- EXE
- 0.24
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CVE | EXE |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.64 | 0.90 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.33 | 0.24 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.35 | 0.68 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 3.04% and Expand Energy (EXE) at 2.70% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.
CVE
Energy industry group
3.04%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- CVE
- 3.04%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
EXE
Energy industry group
2.70%
- Max
- 8.57%
- Q3
- 3.58%
- EXE
- 2.70%
- Median
- 1.71%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 22.84% and Expand Energy (EXE) at 19.84% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
CVE
Energy industry group
22.84%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- CVE
- 22.84%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
EXE
Energy industry group
19.84%
- Max
- 133.24%
- Q3
- 53.31%
- Median
- 25.24%
- EXE
- 19.84%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CVE | EXE |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 3.04% | 2.70% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 22.84% | 19.84% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Expand Energy (EXE) at 7.30 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 10.56 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for EXE, though growth and earnings durability still matter.
CVE
Energy industry group
10.56
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- CVE
- 10.56
- Q1
- 7.71
- Min
- 2.99
EXE
Energy industry group
7.30
- Max
- 39.54
- Q3
- 21.72
- Median
- 12.19
- Q1
- 7.71
- EXE
- 7.30
- Min
- 2.99
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 0.88 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Expand Energy (EXE) at 1.51 prices around its industry’s middle — CVE costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.
CVE
Energy industry group
0.88
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- Q1
- 0.88
- CVE
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
EXE
Energy industry group
1.51
- Max
- 5.40
- Q3
- 2.85
- Median
- 1.69
- EXE
- 1.51
- Q1
- 0.88
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Expand Energy (EXE) at 1.00 sits in the lower P/B ratio quartile against book while Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 1.98 is valued near its industry’s middle — EXE is cheaper on assets, though weigh it against ROE and asset quality.
CVE
Energy industry group
1.98
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- CVE
- 1.98
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- Min
- 0.01
EXE
Energy industry group
1.00
- Max
- 4.21
- Q3
- 2.38
- Median
- 1.51
- Q1
- 1.08
- EXE
- 1.00
- Min
- 0.01
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CVE | EXE |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 10.56 | 7.30 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 0.88 | 1.51 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 1.98 | 1.00 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 20.71% | 7.00% |