Seek Returns

CVE vs. DINO: Cenovus Energy vs. HF Sinclair Stock Comparison

How do Cenovus Energy (CVE) and HF Sinclair (DINO) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

Cenovus Energy (CVE) and HF Sinclair (DINO) both belong to the Oil, Gas & Consumable Fuels industry, though CVE is classified under Integrated Oil & Gas while DINO falls under Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing.

Company profile comparison for Cenovus Energy (CVE) and HF Sinclair (DINO)
Profile ItemCVEDINO
NameCenovus Energy Inc.HF Sinclair Corporation
Country/RegionCanadaUnited States
GICS SectorEnergyEnergy
GICS Industry GroupEnergyEnergy
GICS IndustryOil, Gas & Consumable FuelsOil, Gas & Consumable Fuels
GICS Sub-IndustryIntegrated Oil & GasOil & Gas Refining & Marketing
Market Capitalization49.61 billion USD16.45 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateNovember 17, 2009March 17, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

CVE
DINO
GSPC
Loading price history…
Cenovus Energy (CVE) vs. HF Sinclair (DINO), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for Cenovus Energy (CVE) and HF Sinclair (DINO). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for Cenovus Energy (CVE) and HF Sinclair (DINO). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for Cenovus Energy (CVE) and HF Sinclair (DINO)
MetricCVEDINO
Total Return (1Y)60.99%90.18%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)19.41%29.39%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)18.63%28.64%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

CVE
DINO
GSPC
Loading price history…
Cenovus Energy (CVE) vs. HF Sinclair (DINO), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for Cenovus Energy (CVE) and HF Sinclair (DINO). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for Cenovus Energy (CVE) and HF Sinclair (DINO)
MetricCVEDINO
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)37.47%41.52%
Beta (5Y)0.430.76
Max Drawdown (5Y)-53.51%-57.35%
Avg. Volume (3M)6.90M2.52M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
CVE and DINO are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for Cenovus Energy (CVE) and HF Sinclair (DINO)
MetricCVEDINO
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)1.512.07
Sortino Ratio (1Y)2.203.06

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 27.44% and HF Sinclair (DINO) at 33.21% sit in the top peer quartile for ROE, suggesting each generates more profit from shareholders’ equity than typical industry peers.

CVE

Energy industry group

27.44%

Max
53.85%
CVE
27.44%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%

DINO

Energy industry group

33.21%

Max
53.85%
DINO
33.21%
Q3
24.79%
Median
12.85%
Q1
2.03%
Min
-29.09%
Loading chart…
Cenovus Energy (CVE) vs. HF Sinclair (DINO): A comparison of their ROE against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 15.42% and HF Sinclair (DINO) at 10.13% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

CVE

Energy industry group

15.42%

Max
56.92%
Q3
22.92%
CVE
15.42%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%

DINO

Energy industry group

10.13%

Max
56.92%
Q3
22.92%
DINO
10.13%
Median
10.10%
Q1
0.07%
Min
-27.38%
Loading chart…
Cenovus Energy (CVE) vs. HF Sinclair (DINO): A comparison of their net margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 26.58% and HF Sinclair (DINO) at 25.13% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

CVE

Energy industry group

26.58%

Max
71.31%
Q3
33.75%
CVE
26.58%
Median
18.73%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%

DINO

Energy industry group

25.13%

Max
71.31%
Q3
33.75%
DINO
25.13%
Median
18.73%
Q1
6.94%
Min
-24.52%
Loading chart…
Cenovus Energy (CVE) vs. HF Sinclair (DINO): A comparison of their operating margin against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for Cenovus Energy (CVE) and HF Sinclair (DINO)
MetricCVEDINO
ROE (TTM)27.44%33.21%
ROA (TTM)12.05%15.77%
Net Margin (TTM)15.42%10.13%
Operating Margin (TTM)26.58%25.13%
Gross Margin (TTM)33.92%18.01%

Growth

Revenue Growth

HF Sinclair (DINO) at -5.99% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Cenovus Energy (CVE) at -8.62% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Loading chart…
Cenovus Energy (CVE) vs. HF Sinclair (DINO): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

Both companies show strong earnings momentum, but HF Sinclair (DINO) at 238.46% is the standout with EPS growth above its industry range; Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 28.74% also sits in the top quartile.

Loading chart…
Cenovus Energy (CVE) vs. HF Sinclair (DINO): A comparison of their EPS Growth across different time periods.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for Cenovus Energy (CVE) and HF Sinclair (DINO)
MetricCVEDINO
Revenue Growth (YoY)-8.62%-5.99%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)-9.75%-11.07%
EPS Growth (YoY)28.74%238.46%
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)-12.42%-40.03%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 1.64 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while HF Sinclair (DINO) at 2.27 sits above its industry’s typical mid-range — comfortable liquidity, though possibly with more idle current assets relative to peers.

CVE

Energy industry group

1.64

Max
3.64
Q3
2.21
CVE
1.64
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24

DINO

Energy industry group

2.27

Max
3.64
DINO
2.27
Q3
2.21
Median
1.41
Q1
0.88
Min
0.24
Loading chart…
Cenovus Energy (CVE) vs. HF Sinclair (DINO): A comparison of their current ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

HF Sinclair (DINO) at 0.29 keeps leverage in the lower industry quartile, while Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 0.33 runs a more typical debt-to-equity mix.

CVE

Energy industry group

0.33

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
CVE
0.33
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

DINO

Energy industry group

0.29

Max
1.75
Q3
0.93
Median
0.54
Q1
0.30
DINO
0.29
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Cenovus Energy (CVE) vs. HF Sinclair (DINO): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for Cenovus Energy (CVE) and HF Sinclair (DINO)
MetricCVEDINO
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.642.27
Debt / Equity (MRQ)0.330.29
Net Debt / EBITDA0.350.01

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 3.04% and HF Sinclair (DINO) at 2.07% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

CVE

Energy industry group

3.04%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
CVE
3.04%
Median
1.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

DINO

Energy industry group

2.07%

Max
8.57%
Q3
3.58%
DINO
2.07%
Median
1.71%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Cenovus Energy (CVE) vs. HF Sinclair (DINO): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 22.84% and HF Sinclair (DINO) at 10.32% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

CVE

Energy industry group

22.84%

Max
133.24%
Q3
53.31%
Median
25.24%
CVE
22.84%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

DINO

Energy industry group

10.32%

Max
133.24%
Q3
53.31%
Median
25.24%
DINO
10.32%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
Cenovus Energy (CVE) vs. HF Sinclair (DINO): A comparison of their payout ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for Cenovus Energy (CVE) and HF Sinclair (DINO)
MetricCVEDINO
Dividend Yield (TTM)3.04%2.07%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)22.84%10.32%

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

HF Sinclair (DINO) at 4.95 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 10.56 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for DINO, though growth and earnings durability still matter.

CVE

Energy industry group

10.56

Max
39.54
Q3
21.72
Median
12.19
CVE
10.56
Q1
7.71
Min
2.99

DINO

Energy industry group

4.95

Max
39.54
Q3
21.72
Median
12.19
Q1
7.71
DINO
4.95
Min
2.99
Loading chart…
Cenovus Energy (CVE) vs. HF Sinclair (DINO): A comparison of their P/E ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 0.88 and HF Sinclair (DINO) at 0.47 fetch a relatively low price per dollar of sales, landing in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile of their industries.

CVE

Energy industry group

0.88

Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
CVE
0.88
Min
0.00

DINO

Energy industry group

0.47

Max
5.40
Q3
2.85
Median
1.69
Q1
0.88
DINO
0.47
Min
0.00
Loading chart…
Cenovus Energy (CVE) vs. HF Sinclair (DINO): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

On P/B ratio, both Cenovus Energy (CVE) at 1.98 and HF Sinclair (DINO) at 1.43 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

CVE

Energy industry group

1.98

Max
4.21
Q3
2.38
CVE
1.98
Median
1.51
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01

DINO

Energy industry group

1.43

Max
4.21
Q3
2.38
Median
1.51
DINO
1.43
Q1
1.08
Min
0.01
Loading chart…
Cenovus Energy (CVE) vs. HF Sinclair (DINO): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Energy industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for Cenovus Energy (CVE) and HF Sinclair (DINO)
MetricCVEDINO
P/E Ratio (TTM)10.564.95
P/S Ratio (TTM)0.880.47
P/B Ratio (MRQ)1.981.43
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)20.71%18.17%