CUBE vs. VTR: CubeSmart vs. Ventas Stock Comparison

Company Profile

CubeSmart (CUBE) and Ventas (VTR) both fall under the Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) industry group, but CUBE is classified in Specialized REITs while VTR is classified in Health Care REITs.

Both CubeSmart (CUBE) and Ventas (VTR) are REITs — read their payout ratios and P/E alongside FFO (funds from operations) rather than at face value.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

CubeSmart (CUBE) at 12.78% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Ventas (VTR) at 1.87% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for CUBE.

Neither CubeSmart (CUBE) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) nor Ventas (VTR) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) is well served by net margin: heavy depreciation makes net income a poor profitability proxy in their businesses, where FFO-based measures are the standard read.

Neither side reports a meaningful operating margin: for CubeSmart (CUBE) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) and Ventas (VTR) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs), funding costs are part of the core business, so net margin and ROE are the cleaner profitability reads.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Ventas (VTR) at 18.47% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while CubeSmart (CUBE) at 5.33% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for VTR.

EPS growth isn't a meaningful figure for either CubeSmart (CUBE) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) or Ventas (VTR) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) under our convention.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

Both CubeSmart (CUBE) at 0.17 and Ventas (VTR) at 0.37 run current ratio in the tighter-liquidity quartile of industry peers, leaving thinner cushions against current liabilities than typical competitors.

Both CubeSmart (CUBE) at 1.42 and Ventas (VTR) at 0.77 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

CubeSmart (CUBE) at 4.67% pays a yield in its industry’s typical range, while Ventas (VTR) at 2.29% falls in the bottom quartile of its peers.

An earnings-based payout ratio fits neither CubeSmart (CUBE) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) nor Ventas (VTR) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs): their distributions are mandated and conventionally measured against FFO, so the accounting-earnings ratio overstates both.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

P/E ratio is not a meaningful valuation yardstick for either CubeSmart (CUBE) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) or Ventas (VTR) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs): depreciation suppresses reported earnings in their businesses, and price-to-FFO is the conventional yardstick instead.

Ventas (VTR) at 6.96 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while CubeSmart (CUBE) at 8.80 sits in the pricier quartile — CUBE costs more per dollar of sales.

Both CubeSmart (CUBE) at 4.06 and Ventas (VTR) at 2.97 carry a premium to book value versus peers, sitting in the upper P/B ratio quartile of their industries.

Valuation Metrics