Seek Returns

CUBE vs. REG: CubeSmart vs. Regency Centers Stock Comparison

How do CubeSmart (CUBE) and Regency Centers (REG) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.

Company Profile

CubeSmart (CUBE) and Regency Centers (REG) both fall under the Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) industry group, but CUBE is classified in Specialized REITs while REG is classified in Retail REITs.

Both CubeSmart (CUBE) and Regency Centers (REG) are REITs — read their payout ratios and P/E alongside FFO (funds from operations) rather than at face value.

Company profile comparison for CubeSmart (CUBE) and Regency Centers (REG)
Profile ItemCUBEREG
NameCubeSmartRegency Centers Corporation
Country/RegionUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorReal EstateReal Estate
GICS Industry GroupEquity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs)Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs)
GICS IndustrySpecialized REITsRetail REITs
GICS Sub-IndustrySelf-Storage REITsRetail REITs
Market Capitalization10.10 billion USD13.99 billion USD
CurrencyUSDUSD
ExchangeNYSENasdaq
Listing DateOctober 22, 2004October 29, 1993
Security TypeREITREIT

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

CUBE
REG
GSPC
Loading price history…
CubeSmart (CUBE) vs. Regency Centers (REG), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past five years. Adjusted for dividends and splits.

Trailing Returns

Loading price history…
Trailing total returns for CubeSmart (CUBE) and Regency Centers (REG). Returns over one year are annualized.

Calendar-Year Returns

Loading price history…
Calendar-year total returns for CubeSmart (CUBE) and Regency Centers (REG). Each bar is that year's total return, measured year-end to year-end.

Performance Metrics

Price performance metrics for CubeSmart (CUBE) and Regency Centers (REG)
MetricCUBEREG
Total Return (1Y)28.16%12.94%
Total Return (3Y, Annualized)12.98%12.85%
Total Return (5Y, Annualized)1.18%4.68%

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

CUBE
REG
GSPC
Loading price history…
CubeSmart (CUBE) vs. Regency Centers (REG), with S&P 500 (GSPC) for reference: Drawdown from the running peak over the past five years. Each line shows the decline from its prior peak; 0% marks a new high.

Return Distribution

Loading price history…
Distribution of monthly total returns for CubeSmart (CUBE) and Regency Centers (REG). Each bar is the share of months whose return fell in that 5% bucket.

Risk Metrics

Risk profile metrics for CubeSmart (CUBE) and Regency Centers (REG)
MetricCUBEREG
Volatility (1Y, Annualized)22.12%16.15%
Beta (5Y)0.950.79
Max Drawdown (5Y)-36.93%-30.09%
Avg. Volume (3M)2.33M1.24M

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Loading chart…
CUBE and REG are plotted by 1-year volatility (risk) and 1-year return. The dashed Capital Allocation Line runs from the risk-free rate through the shared industry median.

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Risk-adjusted metrics for CubeSmart (CUBE) and Regency Centers (REG)
MetricCUBEREG
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)1.080.54
Sortino Ratio (1Y)1.710.82

Profitability

ROE (TTM)

CubeSmart (CUBE) at 12.78% sits in the top ROE quartile, while Regency Centers (REG) at 7.67% is closer to the peer norm — stronger capital efficiency for CUBE.

CUBE

Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) industry group

12.78%

Max
22.74%
CUBE
12.78%
Q3
10.54%
Median
6.38%
Q1
1.69%
Min
-10.86%

REG

Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) industry group

7.67%

Max
22.74%
Q3
10.54%
REG
7.67%
Median
6.38%
Q1
1.69%
Min
-10.86%
Loading chart…
CubeSmart (CUBE) vs. Regency Centers (REG): A comparison of their ROE against the Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) industry group benchmark.

Net Margin (TTM)

Neither CubeSmart (CUBE) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) nor Regency Centers (REG) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) is well served by net margin: heavy depreciation makes net income a poor profitability proxy in their businesses, where FFO-based measures are the standard read.

Operating Margin (TTM)

Neither side reports a meaningful operating margin: for CubeSmart (CUBE) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) and Regency Centers (REG) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs), funding costs are part of the core business, so net margin and ROE are the cleaner profitability reads.

Profitability Metrics

Profitability metrics for CubeSmart (CUBE) and Regency Centers (REG)
MetricCUBEREG
ROE (TTM)12.78%7.67%
ROA (TTM)4.42%3.28%
Net Margin (TTM)----
Operating Margin (TTM)----
Gross Margin (TTM)----

Growth

Revenue Growth

Both CubeSmart (CUBE) at 5.33% and Regency Centers (REG) at 6.85% land near their industries' usual revenue growth ranges, so top-line momentum looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Loading chart…
CubeSmart (CUBE) vs. Regency Centers (REG): A comparison of their Revenue Growth across different time periods.

EPS Growth

EPS growth isn't a meaningful figure for either CubeSmart (CUBE) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) or Regency Centers (REG) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) under our convention.

Growth Metrics

Growth metrics for CubeSmart (CUBE) and Regency Centers (REG)
MetricCUBEREG
Revenue Growth (YoY)5.33%6.85%
Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR)3.61%8.27%
EPS Growth (YoY)----
EPS Growth (3Y CAGR)----

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

Regency Centers (REG) at 1.03 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while CubeSmart (CUBE) at 0.17 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for CUBE.

CUBE

Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) industry group

0.17

Max
4.19
Q3
2.11
Median
1.31
Q1
0.62
CUBE
0.17
Min
0.06

REG

Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) industry group

1.03

Max
4.19
Q3
2.11
Median
1.31
REG
1.03
Q1
0.62
Min
0.06
Loading chart…
CubeSmart (CUBE) vs. Regency Centers (REG): A comparison of their current ratio against the Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) industry group benchmark.

Debt / Equity (MRQ)

Both CubeSmart (CUBE) at 1.42 and Regency Centers (REG) at 0.72 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.

CUBE

Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) industry group

1.42

Max
2.72
Q3
1.59
CUBE
1.42
Median
0.99
Q1
0.72
Min
0.20

REG

Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) industry group

0.72

Max
2.72
Q3
1.59
Median
0.99
REG
0.72
Q1
0.72
Min
0.20
Loading chart…
CubeSmart (CUBE) vs. Regency Centers (REG): A comparison of their debt-to-equity ratio against the Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) industry group benchmark.

Financial Strength Metrics

Financial strength metrics for CubeSmart (CUBE) and Regency Centers (REG)
MetricCUBEREG
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.171.03
Debt / Equity (MRQ)1.420.72
Net Debt / EBITDA5.064.54

Dividends

Dividend Yield (TTM)

Both CubeSmart (CUBE) at 4.67% and Regency Centers (REG) at 3.96% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

CUBE

Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) industry group

4.67%

Max
8.62%
Q3
5.95%
CUBE
4.67%
Median
4.34%
Q1
3.26%
Min
0.00%

REG

Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) industry group

3.96%

Max
8.62%
Q3
5.95%
Median
4.34%
REG
3.96%
Q1
3.26%
Min
0.00%
Loading chart…
CubeSmart (CUBE) vs. Regency Centers (REG): A comparison of their dividend yield against the Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) industry group benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

An earnings-based payout ratio fits neither CubeSmart (CUBE) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) nor Regency Centers (REG) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs): their distributions are mandated and conventionally measured against FFO, so the accounting-earnings ratio overstates both.

Dividend Metrics

Dividend metrics for CubeSmart (CUBE) and Regency Centers (REG)
MetricCUBEREG
Dividend Yield (TTM)4.67%3.96%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)----

Valuation

P/E Ratio (TTM)

P/E ratio is not a meaningful valuation yardstick for either CubeSmart (CUBE) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) or Regency Centers (REG) in Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs): depreciation suppresses reported earnings in their businesses, and price-to-FFO is the conventional yardstick instead.

P/S Ratio (TTM)

Both CubeSmart (CUBE) at 8.80 and Regency Centers (REG) at 8.15 command a richer price per dollar of sales than most peers, sitting in the upper P/S ratio quartile of their industries.

CUBE

Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) industry group

8.80

Max
14.47
CUBE
8.80
Q3
8.02
Median
5.98
Q1
3.27
Min
0.43

REG

Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) industry group

8.15

Max
14.47
REG
8.15
Q3
8.02
Median
5.98
Q1
3.27
Min
0.43
Loading chart…
CubeSmart (CUBE) vs. Regency Centers (REG): A comparison of their P/S ratio against the Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) industry group benchmark.

P/B Ratio (MRQ)

Regency Centers (REG) at 2.08 is valued about in line with its industry on P/B ratio, while CubeSmart (CUBE) at 4.06 carries an above-peer premium to book — CUBE is pricier on assets.

CUBE

Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) industry group

4.06

CUBE
4.06
Max
4.06
Q3
2.53
Median
1.64
Q1
1.06
Min
0.21

REG

Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) industry group

2.08

Max
4.06
Q3
2.53
REG
2.08
Median
1.64
Q1
1.06
Min
0.21
Loading chart…
CubeSmart (CUBE) vs. Regency Centers (REG): A comparison of their P/B ratio against the Equity Real Estate Investment Trusts (REITs) industry group benchmark.

Valuation Metrics

Valuation metrics for CubeSmart (CUBE) and Regency Centers (REG)
MetricCUBEREG
P/E Ratio (TTM)----
P/S Ratio (TTM)8.808.15
P/B Ratio (MRQ)4.062.08
Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM)----