CSL vs. PWR: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison
Updated onHere’s a clear look at CSL and PWR, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.
Company Profile
| Symbol | CSL | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Company Name | Carlisle Companies Incorporated | Quanta Services, Inc. |
| Country | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry | Building Products | Construction & Engineering |
| Market Capitalization | 17.06 billion USD | 56.62 billion USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | February 21, 1973 | February 12, 1998 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Historical Performance
This chart compares the performance of CSL and PWR by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.
Historical Performance at a Glance
| Symbol | CSL | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| 5-Day Price Return | 12.56% | -1.91% |
| 13-Week Price Return | -0.51% | 14.17% |
| 26-Week Price Return | 14.20% | 22.14% |
| 52-Week Price Return | 3.92% | 46.12% |
| Month-to-Date Return | 12.48% | -6.44% |
| Year-to-Date Return | 8.17% | 20.22% |
| 10-Day Avg. Volume | 0.63M | 1.31M |
| 3-Month Avg. Volume | 0.47M | 1.24M |
| 3-Month Volatility | 40.60% | 23.85% |
| Beta | 1.04 | 1.05 |
Profitability
Return on Equity (TTM)
CSL
33.90%
Building Products Industry
- Max
- 48.58%
- Q3
- 27.65%
- Median
- 16.01%
- Q1
- 8.81%
- Min
- -6.66%
In the upper quartile for the Building Products industry, CSL’s Return on Equity of 33.90% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.
PWR
13.09%
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 29.61%
- Q3
- 17.18%
- Median
- 10.42%
- Q1
- 8.10%
- Min
- -0.10%
PWR’s Return on Equity of 13.09% is on par with the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.
Net Profit Margin (TTM)
CSL
16.12%
Building Products Industry
- Max
- 26.11%
- Q3
- 15.09%
- Median
- 9.48%
- Q1
- 5.16%
- Min
- -3.43%
A Net Profit Margin of 16.12% places CSL in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.
PWR
3.73%
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 11.14%
- Q3
- 6.17%
- Median
- 3.85%
- Q1
- 2.40%
- Min
- -0.05%
PWR’s Net Profit Margin of 3.73% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Construction & Engineering industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)
CSL
21.17%
Building Products Industry
- Max
- 26.67%
- Q3
- 18.75%
- Median
- 14.89%
- Q1
- 8.70%
- Min
- -1.00%
An Operating Profit Margin of 21.17% places CSL in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.
PWR
5.73%
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 17.56%
- Q3
- 9.36%
- Median
- 5.46%
- Q1
- 3.47%
- Min
- -1.93%
PWR’s Operating Profit Margin of 5.73% is around the midpoint for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.
Profitability at a Glance
| Symbol | CSL | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Return on Equity (TTM) | 33.90% | 13.09% |
| Return on Assets (TTM) | 13.86% | 5.08% |
| Net Profit Margin (TTM) | 16.12% | 3.73% |
| Operating Profit Margin (TTM) | 21.17% | 5.73% |
| Gross Profit Margin (TTM) | 36.92% | 15.04% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
CSL
2.19
Building Products Industry
- Max
- 2.87
- Q3
- 2.03
- Median
- 1.60
- Q1
- 1.32
- Min
- 0.88
CSL’s Current Ratio of 2.19 is in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.
PWR
1.37
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 1.53
- Median
- 1.24
- Q1
- 1.05
- Min
- 0.66
PWR’s Current Ratio of 1.37 aligns with the median group of the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)
CSL
0.89
Building Products Industry
- Max
- 1.64
- Q3
- 1.02
- Median
- 0.66
- Q1
- 0.32
- Min
- 0.00
CSL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.89 is typical for the Building Products industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.
PWR
0.60
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 2.49
- Q3
- 1.19
- Median
- 0.63
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
PWR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.60 is typical for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)
CSL
86.45
Building Products Industry
- Max
- 72.12
- Q3
- 34.39
- Median
- 15.31
- Q1
- 6.06
- Min
- 0.85
With an Interest Coverage Ratio of 86.45, CSL demonstrates a superior capacity to service its debt, placing it well above the typical range for the Building Products industry. This stems from either robust earnings or a conservative debt load.
PWR
10.76
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 23.59
- Q3
- 14.49
- Median
- 8.20
- Q1
- 5.26
- Min
- -6.49
PWR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 10.76 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Construction & Engineering industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.
Financial Strength at a Glance
| Symbol | CSL | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 2.19 | 1.37 |
| Quick Ratio (MRQ) | 1.47 | 1.24 |
| Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) | 0.89 | 0.60 |
| Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) | 86.45 | 10.76 |
Growth
Revenue Growth
EPS Growth
Dividend
Dividend Yield (TTM)
CSL
1.07%
Building Products Industry
- Max
- 2.56%
- Q3
- 1.94%
- Median
- 1.04%
- Q1
- 0.66%
- Min
- 0.00%
CSL’s Dividend Yield of 1.07% is consistent with its peers in the Building Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.
PWR
0.10%
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 6.28%
- Q3
- 3.25%
- Median
- 2.02%
- Q1
- 0.23%
- Min
- 0.00%
PWR’s Dividend Yield of 0.10% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
CSL
22.20%
Building Products Industry
- Max
- 157.36%
- Q3
- 77.74%
- Median
- 29.49%
- Q1
- 16.25%
- Min
- 0.00%
CSL’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 22.20% is within the typical range for the Building Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.
PWR
5.92%
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 139.17%
- Q3
- 69.47%
- Median
- 40.99%
- Q1
- 10.51%
- Min
- 0.00%
PWR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 5.92% is in the lower quartile for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.
Dividend at a Glance
| Symbol | CSL | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.07% | 0.10% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 22.20% | 5.92% |
Valuation
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)
CSL
20.80
Building Products Industry
- Max
- 66.79
- Q3
- 37.37
- Median
- 21.86
- Q1
- 17.57
- Min
- 9.70
CSL’s P/E Ratio of 20.80 is within the middle range for the Building Products industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.
PWR
59.76
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 36.96
- Q3
- 24.81
- Median
- 15.45
- Q1
- 12.51
- Min
- 2.74
At 59.76, PWR’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Construction & Engineering industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)
CSL
3.35
Building Products Industry
- Max
- 6.40
- Q3
- 3.25
- Median
- 1.65
- Q1
- 1.11
- Min
- 0.34
CSL’s P/S Ratio of 3.35 is in the upper echelon for the Building Products industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.
PWR
2.23
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 3.22
- Q3
- 1.63
- Median
- 0.61
- Q1
- 0.48
- Min
- 0.11
PWR’s P/S Ratio of 2.23 is in the upper echelon for the Construction & Engineering industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)
CSL
7.62
Building Products Industry
- Max
- 13.31
- Q3
- 6.85
- Median
- 3.20
- Q1
- 1.71
- Min
- 0.73
CSL’s P/B Ratio of 7.62 is in the upper tier for the Building Products industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.
PWR
7.13
Construction & Engineering Industry
- Max
- 5.74
- Q3
- 3.33
- Median
- 1.49
- Q1
- 1.20
- Min
- 0.23
At 7.13, PWR’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Construction & Engineering industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.
Valuation at a Glance
| Symbol | CSL | PWR |
|---|---|---|
| Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) | 20.80 | 59.76 |
| Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) | 3.35 | 2.23 |
| Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) | 7.62 | 7.13 |
| Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM) | 18.93 | 42.76 |