CSL vs. LMT: Carlisle vs. Lockheed Martin Stock Comparison
How do Carlisle (CSL) and Lockheed Martin (LMT) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Carlisle (CSL) and Lockheed Martin (LMT) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but CSL is classified in Building Products while LMT is classified in Aerospace & Defense.
| Profile Item | CSL | LMT |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Carlisle Companies Incorporated | Lockheed Martin Corporation |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Building Products | Aerospace & Defense |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Building Products | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Capitalization | 14.52 billion USD | 131.00 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | February 21, 1973 | January 2, 1962 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CSL | LMT |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 24.99% | 31.17% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 15.85% | 12.79% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 12.02% | 14.65% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | CSL | LMT |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 38.46% | 31.09% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.76 | 0.10 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -37.72% | -31.79% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 509.16K | 1.29M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CSL | LMT |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.54 | 0.86 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.87 | 1.38 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both Carlisle (CSL) at 42.34% and Lockheed Martin (LMT) at 80.19% turn shareholders’ equity into profit at rates above their industry benchmark ranges for ROE. That is a strong capital-efficiency signal, though leverage and the equity base still matter.
CSL
Capital Goods industry group
42.34%
- CSL
- 42.34%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
LMT
Capital Goods industry group
80.19%
- LMT
- 80.19%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
Carlisle (CSL) at 13.78% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of Lockheed Martin (LMT) at 8.23%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
CSL
Capital Goods industry group
13.78%
- Max
- 27.47%
- CSL
- 13.78%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
LMT
Capital Goods industry group
8.23%
- Max
- 27.47%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- LMT
- 8.23%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Carlisle (CSL) at 20.21% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Lockheed Martin (LMT) at 11.41%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
CSL
Capital Goods industry group
20.21%
- Max
- 36.60%
- CSL
- 20.21%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
LMT
Capital Goods industry group
11.41%
- Max
- 36.60%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- LMT
- 11.41%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CSL | LMT |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 42.34% | 80.19% |
| ROA (TTM) | 10.20% | 8.58% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 13.78% | 8.23% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 20.21% | 11.41% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 34.66% | 11.73% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Lockheed Martin (LMT) at 5.64% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Carlisle (CSL) at 0.33% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Lockheed Martin (LMT) at -3.68% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Carlisle (CSL) at -38.46% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CSL | LMT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 0.33% | 5.64% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -2.70% | 4.38% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -38.46% | -3.68% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -0.84% | -0.26% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Carlisle (CSL) at 2.41 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Lockheed Martin (LMT) at 1.26 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for LMT.
CSL
Capital Goods industry group
2.41
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- CSL
- 2.41
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
LMT
Capital Goods industry group
1.26
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- LMT
- 1.26
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Carlisle (CSL) at 2.01 and Lockheed Martin (LMT) at 2.04 lean more heavily on debt funding than most peers, landing in the higher-leverage quartile of their industries.
CSL
Capital Goods industry group
2.01
- Max
- 2.33
- CSL
- 2.01
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
LMT
Capital Goods industry group
2.04
- Max
- 2.33
- LMT
- 2.04
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CSL | LMT |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 2.41 | 1.26 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 2.01 | 2.04 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.93 | 1.47 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Both Carlisle (CSL) at 1.20% and Lockheed Martin (LMT) at 2.40% offer top-quartile dividend income relative to share price within their industries.
CSL
Capital Goods industry group
1.20%
- Max
- 2.66%
- CSL
- 1.20%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
LMT
Capital Goods industry group
2.40%
- Max
- 2.66%
- LMT
- 2.40%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Carlisle (CSL) at 25.50% pays out a band-typical share of earnings, while Lockheed Martin (LMT) at 49.01% distributes more than its industry norm — less retained, thinner cover.
CSL
Capital Goods industry group
25.50%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- CSL
- 25.50%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
LMT
Capital Goods industry group
49.01%
- Max
- 67.39%
- LMT
- 49.01%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CSL | LMT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.20% | 2.40% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 25.50% | 49.01% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Carlisle (CSL) at 21.06 and Lockheed Martin (LMT) at 20.14 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
CSL
Capital Goods industry group
21.06
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- CSL
- 21.06
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
LMT
Capital Goods industry group
20.14
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- LMT
- 20.14
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both Carlisle (CSL) at 2.79 and Lockheed Martin (LMT) at 1.66 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
CSL
Capital Goods industry group
2.79
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- CSL
- 2.79
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
LMT
Capital Goods industry group
1.66
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- LMT
- 1.66
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Measured against book value, both Carlisle (CSL) at 10.11 and Lockheed Martin (LMT) at 12.96 look expensive — each P/B ratio sits above its industry’s benchmark range.
CSL
Capital Goods industry group
10.11
- CSL
- 10.11
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
LMT
Capital Goods industry group
12.96
- LMT
- 12.96
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CSL | LMT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 21.06 | 20.14 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 2.79 | 1.66 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 10.11 | 12.96 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 4.01% | 4.31% |