CSL vs. CW: Carlisle vs. Curtiss-Wright Stock Comparison
How do Carlisle (CSL) and Curtiss-Wright (CW) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Carlisle (CSL) and Curtiss-Wright (CW) both fall under the Capital Goods industry group, but CSL is classified in Building Products while CW is classified in Aerospace & Defense.
| Profile Item | CSL | CW |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Carlisle Companies Incorporated | Curtiss-Wright Corporation |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Industrials | Industrials |
| GICS Industry Group | Capital Goods | Capital Goods |
| GICS Industry | Building Products | Aerospace & Defense |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Building Products | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Capitalization | 14.52 billion USD | 16.81 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | February 21, 1973 | March 17, 1980 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CSL | CW |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 24.99% | -15.83% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 15.85% | 33.49% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 12.02% | 29.54% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | CSL | CW |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 38.46% | 38.26% |
| Beta (5Y) | 0.76 | 0.93 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -37.72% | -45.25% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 509.16K | 427.49K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CSL | CW |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 0.54 | -0.53 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 0.87 | -0.71 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both companies show strong equity returns, but Carlisle (CSL) at 42.34% is the standout with ROE above its industry range; Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 21.82% also sits in the top quartile.
CSL
Capital Goods industry group
42.34%
- CSL
- 42.34%
- Max
- 40.55%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
CW
Capital Goods industry group
21.82%
- Max
- 40.55%
- CW
- 21.82%
- Q3
- 19.29%
- Median
- 12.12%
- Q1
- 4.08%
- Min
- -17.12%
Net Margin (TTM)
For every dollar of sales, both Carlisle (CSL) at 13.78% and Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 14.86% retain more as net profit than most peers, landing in the top net margin quartile of their industries.
CSL
Capital Goods industry group
13.78%
- Max
- 27.47%
- CSL
- 13.78%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
CW
Capital Goods industry group
14.86%
- Max
- 27.47%
- CW
- 14.86%
- Q3
- 12.10%
- Median
- 6.30%
- Q1
- 1.40%
- Min
- -12.89%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Both Carlisle (CSL) at 20.21% and Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 19.87% convert sales into operating profit at a top-quartile rate, pointing to tighter cost discipline before financing and tax.
CSL
Capital Goods industry group
20.21%
- Max
- 36.60%
- CSL
- 20.21%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
CW
Capital Goods industry group
19.87%
- Max
- 36.60%
- CW
- 19.87%
- Q3
- 18.33%
- Median
- 11.12%
- Q1
- 5.14%
- Min
- -12.63%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CSL | CW |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 42.34% | 21.82% |
| ROA (TTM) | 10.20% | 8.90% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 13.78% | 14.86% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 20.21% | 19.87% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 34.66% | 38.07% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 12.08% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Carlisle (CSL) at 0.33% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.
EPS Growth
Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 21.99% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Carlisle (CSL) at -38.46% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CSL | CW |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 0.33% | 12.08% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | -2.70% | 11.01% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -38.46% | 21.99% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -0.84% | 19.09% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Carlisle (CSL) at 2.41 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 1.42 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for CW.
CSL
Capital Goods industry group
2.41
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- CSL
- 2.41
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- Min
- 0.36
CW
Capital Goods industry group
1.42
- Max
- 5.22
- Q3
- 2.95
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.43
- CW
- 1.42
- Min
- 0.36
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 0.45 carries an industry-typical debt-to-equity mix, while Carlisle (CSL) at 2.01 uses more debt funding than most peers.
CSL
Capital Goods industry group
2.01
- Max
- 2.33
- CSL
- 2.01
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
CW
Capital Goods industry group
0.45
- Max
- 2.33
- Q3
- 1.12
- Median
- 0.60
- CW
- 0.45
- Q1
- 0.29
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CSL | CW |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 2.41 | 1.42 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 2.01 | 0.45 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 1.93 | 1.00 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Carlisle (CSL) at 1.20% delivers top-quartile income for its industry, while Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 0.23% pays a more typical yield — both are credible income propositions, CSL the richer one.
CSL
Capital Goods industry group
1.20%
- Max
- 2.66%
- CSL
- 1.20%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
CW
Capital Goods industry group
0.23%
- Max
- 2.66%
- Q3
- 1.14%
- Median
- 0.24%
- CW
- 0.23%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Carlisle (CSL) at 25.50% and Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 6.67% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
CSL
Capital Goods industry group
25.50%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- CSL
- 25.50%
- Median
- 6.86%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
CW
Capital Goods industry group
6.67%
- Max
- 67.39%
- Q3
- 28.02%
- Median
- 6.86%
- CW
- 6.67%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CSL | CW |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 1.20% | 0.23% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 25.50% | 6.67% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Both Carlisle (CSL) at 21.06 and Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 30.92 land around their industries’ usual P/E ratio levels — neither is getting a clear earnings-multiple discount or premium versus peers.
CSL
Capital Goods industry group
21.06
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- Median
- 25.41
- CSL
- 21.06
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
CW
Capital Goods industry group
30.92
- Max
- 59.38
- Q3
- 35.92
- CW
- 30.92
- Median
- 25.41
- Q1
- 19.47
- Min
- 3.03
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Carlisle (CSL) at 2.79 is priced about in line with its industry on P/S ratio, while Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 4.50 sits in the pricier quartile — CW costs more per dollar of sales.
CSL
Capital Goods industry group
2.79
- Max
- 7.54
- Q3
- 3.76
- CSL
- 2.79
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
CW
Capital Goods industry group
4.50
- Max
- 7.54
- CW
- 4.50
- Q3
- 3.76
- Median
- 2.15
- Q1
- 1.03
- Min
- 0.03
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Both look rich against book: Curtiss-Wright (CW) at 6.64 sits in the upper P/B ratio quartile, and Carlisle (CSL) at 10.11 prices even higher, above its industry range.
CSL
Capital Goods industry group
10.11
- CSL
- 10.11
- Max
- 9.66
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
CW
Capital Goods industry group
6.64
- Max
- 9.66
- CW
- 6.64
- Q3
- 5.00
- Median
- 3.12
- Q1
- 1.81
- Min
- -1.08
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CSL | CW |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 21.06 | 30.92 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 2.79 | 4.50 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 10.11 | 6.64 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 4.01% | 2.86% |