Seek Returns logo

CSGP vs. FSV: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CSGP and FSV, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCSGPFSV
Company NameCoStar Group, Inc.FirstService Corporation
CountryUnited StatesCanada
GICS SectorReal EstateReal Estate
GICS IndustryReal Estate Management & DevelopmentReal Estate Management & Development
Market Capitalization35.37 billion USD8.56 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNasdaqGS
Listing DateJuly 1, 1998June 2, 2015
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CSGP and FSV by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CSGP vs. FSV: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCSGPFSV
5-Day Price Return0.38%-0.15%
13-Week Price Return4.94%12.07%
26-Week Price Return4.98%8.42%
52-Week Price Return12.48%7.30%
Month-to-Date Return-5.72%-4.10%
Year-to-Date Return17.85%1.83%
10-Day Avg. Volume3.22M0.16M
3-Month Avg. Volume2.83M0.10M
3-Month Volatility25.82%23.65%
Beta0.880.85

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CSGP

1.29%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
20.58%
Q3
9.51%
Median
3.59%
Q1
0.57%
Min
-9.76%

CSGP’s Return on Equity of 1.29% is on par with the norm for the Real Estate Management & Development industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

FSV

11.84%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
20.58%
Q3
9.51%
Median
3.59%
Q1
0.57%
Min
-9.76%

In the upper quartile for the Real Estate Management & Development industry, FSV’s Return on Equity of 11.84% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

CSGP vs. FSV: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CSGP

3.57%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
61.27%
Q3
26.17%
Median
9.35%
Q1
2.35%
Min
-23.71%

CSGP’s Net Profit Margin of 3.57% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

FSV

2.61%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
61.27%
Q3
26.17%
Median
9.35%
Q1
2.35%
Min
-23.71%

FSV’s Net Profit Margin of 2.61% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CSGP vs. FSV: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CSGP

-0.22%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
114.22%
Q3
51.26%
Median
23.27%
Q1
7.24%
Min
-44.62%

CSGP has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -0.22%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

FSV

6.49%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
114.22%
Q3
51.26%
Median
23.27%
Q1
7.24%
Min
-44.62%

FSV’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.49% is in the lower quartile for the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

CSGP vs. FSV: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCSGPFSV
Return on Equity (TTM)1.29%11.84%
Return on Assets (TTM)1.06%3.36%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)3.57%2.61%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)-0.22%6.49%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)79.33%33.22%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CSGP

5.83

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
4.10
Q3
2.25
Median
1.48
Q1
1.00
Min
0.04

CSGP’s Current Ratio of 5.83 is exceptionally high, placing it well outside the typical range for the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This indicates a very strong liquidity position, though such a high ratio may also suggest that the company is not using its assets efficiently to generate profits.

FSV

1.74

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
4.10
Q3
2.25
Median
1.48
Q1
1.00
Min
0.04

FSV’s Current Ratio of 1.74 aligns with the median group of the Real Estate Management & Development industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CSGP vs. FSV: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CSGP

0.12

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
2.62
Q3
1.32
Median
0.85
Q1
0.40
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Real Estate Management & Development industry, CSGP’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.12 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

FSV

0.99

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
2.62
Q3
1.32
Median
0.85
Q1
0.40
Min
0.00

FSV’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.99 is typical for the Real Estate Management & Development industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CSGP vs. FSV: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CSGP

14.65

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
29.35
Q3
12.97
Median
3.68
Q1
1.32
Min
-3.02

CSGP’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 14.65 is in the upper quartile for the Real Estate Management & Development industry, signifying a strong and healthy capacity to meet its interest payments from operating profits.

FSV

4.11

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
29.35
Q3
12.97
Median
3.68
Q1
1.32
Min
-3.02

FSV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.11 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Real Estate Management & Development industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CSGP vs. FSV: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCSGPFSV
Current Ratio (MRQ)5.831.74
Quick Ratio (MRQ)5.721.33
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.120.99
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)14.654.11

Growth

Revenue Growth

CSGP vs. FSV: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CSGP vs. FSV: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CSGP

0.00%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
6.97%
Q3
3.55%
Median
2.31%
Q1
0.48%
Min
0.00%

CSGP currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

FSV

0.53%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
6.97%
Q3
3.55%
Median
2.31%
Q1
0.48%
Min
0.00%

FSV’s Dividend Yield of 0.53% is consistent with its peers in the Real Estate Management & Development industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CSGP vs. FSV: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CSGP

0.00%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
310.03%
Q3
143.62%
Median
62.44%
Q1
29.44%
Min
0.00%

CSGP has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FSV

32.66%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
310.03%
Q3
143.62%
Median
62.44%
Q1
29.44%
Min
0.00%

FSV’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 32.66% is within the typical range for the Real Estate Management & Development industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CSGP vs. FSV: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCSGPFSV
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.53%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%32.66%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CSGP

340.75

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
56.83
Q3
31.11
Median
15.41
Q1
11.32
Min
3.67

At 340.75, CSGP’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

FSV

61.06

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
56.83
Q3
31.11
Median
15.41
Q1
11.32
Min
3.67

At 61.06, FSV’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

CSGP vs. FSV: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CSGP

12.18

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
12.20
Q3
5.67
Median
2.73
Q1
0.97
Min
0.06

CSGP’s P/S Ratio of 12.18 is in the upper echelon for the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

FSV

1.60

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
12.20
Q3
5.67
Median
2.73
Q1
0.97
Min
0.06

FSV’s P/S Ratio of 1.60 aligns with the market consensus for the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CSGP vs. FSV: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CSGP

3.94

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
2.36
Q3
1.20
Median
0.75
Q1
0.39
Min
0.06

At 3.94, CSGP’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

FSV

6.16

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
2.36
Q3
1.20
Median
0.75
Q1
0.39
Min
0.06

At 6.16, FSV’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CSGP vs. FSV: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCSGPFSV
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)340.7561.06
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)12.181.60
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)3.946.16
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)1,203.6035.17