Seek Returns logo

FSV vs. JLL: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at FSV and JLL, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolFSVJLL
Company NameFirstService CorporationJones Lang LaSalle Incorporated
CountryCanadaUnited States
GICS SectorReal EstateReal Estate
GICS IndustryReal Estate Management & DevelopmentReal Estate Management & Development
Market Capitalization9.12 billion USD14.07 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateJune 2, 2015July 17, 1997
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of FSV and JLL by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

FSV vs. JLL: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolFSVJLL
5-Day Price Return-0.28%8.24%
13-Week Price Return11.53%23.45%
26-Week Price Return7.97%5.07%
52-Week Price Return16.57%26.38%
Month-to-Date Return-1.40%9.82%
Year-to-Date Return3.42%17.29%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.10M0.51M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.09M0.44M
3-Month Volatility24.72%30.36%
Beta0.801.42

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

FSV

11.84%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
14.65%
Q3
8.92%
Median
3.63%
Q1
1.63%
Min
-8.05%

In the upper quartile for the Real Estate Management & Development industry, FSV’s Return on Equity of 11.84% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

JLL

8.26%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
14.65%
Q3
8.92%
Median
3.63%
Q1
1.63%
Min
-8.05%

JLL’s Return on Equity of 8.26% is on par with the norm for the Real Estate Management & Development industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

FSV vs. JLL: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

FSV

2.61%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
57.16%
Q3
24.60%
Median
9.48%
Q1
2.61%
Min
-26.61%

FSV’s Net Profit Margin of 2.61% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

JLL

2.29%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
57.16%
Q3
24.60%
Median
9.48%
Q1
2.61%
Min
-26.61%

Falling into the lower quartile for the Real Estate Management & Development industry, JLL’s Net Profit Margin of 2.29% indicates weaker profitability. This means the company retains a smaller portion of each dollar in sales as profit compared to its competitors.

FSV vs. JLL: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

FSV

6.49%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
92.29%
Q3
43.61%
Median
20.96%
Q1
6.44%
Min
-48.90%

FSV’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.49% is around the midpoint for the Real Estate Management & Development industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

JLL

3.72%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
92.29%
Q3
43.61%
Median
20.96%
Q1
6.44%
Min
-48.90%

JLL’s Operating Profit Margin of 3.72% is in the lower quartile for the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This indicates weaker profitability from core operations, which may stem from inefficiencies or competitive pressures on pricing.

FSV vs. JLL: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolFSVJLL
Return on Equity (TTM)11.84%8.26%
Return on Assets (TTM)3.36%3.29%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)2.61%2.29%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)6.49%3.72%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)33.22%57.03%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

FSV

1.74

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
3.73
Q3
2.22
Median
1.42
Q1
1.03
Min
0.04

FSV’s Current Ratio of 1.74 aligns with the median group of the Real Estate Management & Development industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

JLL

1.10

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
3.73
Q3
2.22
Median
1.42
Q1
1.03
Min
0.04

JLL’s Current Ratio of 1.10 aligns with the median group of the Real Estate Management & Development industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

FSV vs. JLL: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

FSV

0.99

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
2.62
Q3
1.30
Median
0.84
Q1
0.39
Min
0.00

FSV’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.99 is typical for the Real Estate Management & Development industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

JLL

0.45

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
2.62
Q3
1.30
Median
0.84
Q1
0.39
Min
0.00

JLL’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.45 is typical for the Real Estate Management & Development industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

FSV vs. JLL: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

FSV

4.11

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
23.14
Q3
12.97
Median
3.68
Q1
1.29
Min
-4.45

FSV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.11 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Real Estate Management & Development industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

JLL

4.25

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
23.14
Q3
12.97
Median
3.68
Q1
1.29
Min
-4.45

JLL’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 4.25 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Real Estate Management & Development industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

FSV vs. JLL: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolFSVJLL
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.741.10
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.331.01
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.990.45
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)4.114.25

Growth

Revenue Growth

FSV vs. JLL: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

FSV vs. JLL: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

FSV

0.52%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
6.79%
Q3
3.51%
Median
2.22%
Q1
0.52%
Min
0.00%

FSV’s Dividend Yield of 0.52% is consistent with its peers in the Real Estate Management & Development industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

JLL

0.00%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
6.79%
Q3
3.51%
Median
2.22%
Q1
0.52%
Min
0.00%

JLL currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

FSV vs. JLL: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

FSV

32.66%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
242.45%
Q3
106.13%
Median
55.27%
Q1
14.97%
Min
0.00%

FSV’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 32.66% is within the typical range for the Real Estate Management & Development industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

JLL

0.00%

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
242.45%
Q3
106.13%
Median
55.27%
Q1
14.97%
Min
0.00%

JLL has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

FSV vs. JLL: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolFSVJLL
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.52%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)32.66%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

FSV

62.68

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
41.09
Q3
23.50
Median
17.29
Q1
11.14
Min
6.36

At 62.68, FSV’s P/E Ratio is exceptionally high, exceeding the typical maximum for the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This suggests the stock may be significantly overvalued compared to its peers and implies high market expectations that could be difficult to meet.

JLL

24.33

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
41.09
Q3
23.50
Median
17.29
Q1
11.14
Min
6.36

A P/E Ratio of 24.33 places JLL in the upper quartile for the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

FSV vs. JLL: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

FSV

1.64

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
12.22
Q3
5.64
Median
2.53
Q1
0.98
Min
0.01

FSV’s P/S Ratio of 1.64 aligns with the market consensus for the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

JLL

0.56

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
12.22
Q3
5.64
Median
2.53
Q1
0.98
Min
0.01

In the lower quartile for the Real Estate Management & Development industry, JLL’s P/S Ratio of 0.56 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

FSV vs. JLL: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

FSV

6.24

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
2.36
Q3
1.18
Median
0.75
Q1
0.35
Min
0.06

At 6.24, FSV’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

JLL

1.72

Real Estate Management & Development Industry

Max
2.36
Q3
1.18
Median
0.75
Q1
0.35
Min
0.06

JLL’s P/B Ratio of 1.72 is in the upper tier for the Real Estate Management & Development industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

FSV vs. JLL: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Real Estate Management & Development industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolFSVJLL
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)62.6824.33
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)1.640.56
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)6.241.72
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)36.109.99