Seek Returns logo

CRWV vs. HUBS: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CRWV and HUBS, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCRWVHUBS
Company NameCoreWeave, Inc.HubSpot, Inc.
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
GICS SectorInformation TechnologyInformation Technology
GICS IndustryIT ServicesSoftware
Market Capitalization56.70 billion USD23.07 billion USD
ExchangeNasdaqGSNYSE
Listing DateMarch 28, 2025October 9, 2014
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CRWV and HUBS by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CRWV vs. HUBS: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCRWVHUBS
5-Day Price Return-2.74%-5.22%
13-Week Price Return101.33%-33.94%
26-Week Price Return---43.74%
52-Week Price Return---6.72%
Month-to-Date Return3.18%-15.76%
Year-to-Date Return194.40%-37.17%
10-Day Avg. Volume18.72M1.37M
3-Month Avg. Volume18.38M0.84M
3-Month Volatility138.31%41.27%
Beta0.421.62

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CRWV

--

IT Services Industry

Max
29.51%
Q3
16.98%
Median
13.47%
Q1
7.93%
Min
-3.97%

Return on Equity data for CRWV is currently unavailable.

HUBS

-0.62%

Software Industry

Max
59.01%
Q3
21.98%
Median
7.15%
Q1
-11.12%
Min
-51.24%

HUBS has a negative Return on Equity of -0.62%. This indicates the company is generating a loss for its shareholders, which can be a result of unprofitability or negative shareholder equity and is often a sign of financial distress.

CRWV vs. HUBS: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CRWV

-40.67%

IT Services Industry

Max
19.82%
Q3
11.49%
Median
6.67%
Q1
3.61%
Min
-4.62%

CRWV has a negative Net Profit Margin of -40.67%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

HUBS

-0.42%

Software Industry

Max
48.14%
Q3
18.23%
Median
5.60%
Q1
-9.22%
Min
-49.36%

HUBS has a negative Net Profit Margin of -0.42%, indicating the company is operating at a net loss as its expenses exceeded its revenues.

CRWV vs. HUBS: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CRWV

10.25%

IT Services Industry

Max
21.69%
Q3
14.50%
Median
10.06%
Q1
6.98%
Min
0.06%

CRWV’s Operating Profit Margin of 10.25% is around the midpoint for the IT Services industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

HUBS

-3.10%

Software Industry

Max
57.34%
Q3
20.60%
Median
7.84%
Q1
-8.72%
Min
-51.37%

HUBS has a negative Operating Profit Margin of -3.10%. This signifies the company is unprofitable at the operational level, as its core business expenses exceed its revenue.

CRWV vs. HUBS: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCRWVHUBS
Return on Equity (TTM)---0.62%
Return on Assets (TTM)---0.32%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)-40.67%-0.42%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)10.25%-3.10%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)73.91%84.55%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CRWV

0.44

IT Services Industry

Max
2.42
Q3
1.81
Median
1.47
Q1
1.09
Min
0.44

CRWV’s Current Ratio of 0.44 falls into the lower quartile for the IT Services industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

HUBS

1.79

Software Industry

Max
3.83
Q3
2.31
Median
1.45
Q1
1.03
Min
0.24

HUBS’s Current Ratio of 1.79 aligns with the median group of the Software industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CRWV vs. HUBS: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CRWV

2.86

IT Services Industry

Max
2.33
Q3
1.17
Median
0.54
Q1
0.15
Min
0.00

With a Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 2.86, CRWV operates with exceptionally high leverage compared to the IT Services industry norm. This suggests an aggressive reliance on debt financing, which can magnify returns but also significantly elevates financial risk.

HUBS

0.00

Software Industry

Max
2.14
Q3
0.90
Median
0.29
Q1
0.00
Min
0.00

HUBS’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.00 is typical for the Software industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CRWV vs. HUBS: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CRWV

0.33

IT Services Industry

Max
144.50
Q3
84.49
Median
13.76
Q1
2.59
Min
-28.13

CRWV’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 0.33 is a critical concern. A value below 1.0 means operating earnings are insufficient to cover interest expenses, indicating severe financial strain and high default risk.

HUBS

-2.05

Software Industry

Max
67.02
Q3
19.86
Median
0.70
Q1
-12.50
Min
-53.00

HUBS has a negative Interest Coverage Ratio of -2.05. This indicates that its earnings were insufficient to cover even its operational costs, let alone its interest payments, signaling significant financial distress.

CRWV vs. HUBS: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCRWVHUBS
Current Ratio (MRQ)0.441.79
Quick Ratio (MRQ)0.431.70
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)2.860.00
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)0.33-2.05

Growth

Revenue Growth

CRWV vs. HUBS: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CRWV vs. HUBS: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CRWV

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
2.80%
Q3
1.74%
Median
0.62%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CRWV currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

HUBS

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
0.08%
Q3
0.03%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HUBS currently does not pay a dividend, resulting in a yield of 0%. This is a common strategy for growth-focused companies that prioritize reinvesting earnings, though it may be less typical in mature, income-oriented sectors.

CRWV vs. HUBS: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CRWV

0.00%

IT Services Industry

Max
147.75%
Q3
63.58%
Median
24.63%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

CRWV has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

HUBS

0.00%

Software Industry

Max
1.32%
Q3
0.53%
Median
0.00%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

HUBS has a Dividend Payout Ratio of 0%, indicating it does not currently pay a dividend. This is a common strategy for growth-oriented companies that reinvest all profits back into the business.

CRWV vs. HUBS: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCRWVHUBS
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.00%0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)0.00%0.00%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CRWV

--

IT Services Industry

Max
41.55
Q3
31.54
Median
23.25
Q1
18.12
Min
6.57

P/E Ratio data for CRWV is currently unavailable.

HUBS

--

Software Industry

Max
149.35
Q3
100.21
Median
47.97
Q1
26.77
Min
11.68

P/E Ratio data for HUBS is currently unavailable.

CRWV vs. HUBS: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CRWV

19.84

IT Services Industry

Max
6.61
Q3
4.37
Median
2.02
Q1
1.20
Min
0.19

With a P/S Ratio of 19.84, CRWV trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the IT Services industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

HUBS

7.84

Software Industry

Max
25.24
Q3
13.52
Median
8.15
Q1
4.87
Min
0.98

HUBS’s P/S Ratio of 7.84 aligns with the market consensus for the Software industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

CRWV vs. HUBS: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective IT Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CRWV

5.61

IT Services Industry

Max
11.19
Q3
6.38
Median
3.47
Q1
2.31
Min
0.96

CRWV’s P/B Ratio of 5.61 is within the conventional range for the IT Services industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

HUBS

14.22

Software Industry

Max
30.95
Q3
14.91
Median
7.75
Q1
3.60
Min
0.38

HUBS’s P/B Ratio of 14.22 is within the conventional range for the Software industry. This shows a balanced market view, where the stock’s price is neither at a significant premium nor a discount to the book value of its peers.

CRWV vs. HUBS: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective IT Services and Software industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCRWVHUBS
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)----
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)19.847.84
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.6114.22
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)--43.57