CRWD vs. FICO: CrowdStrike vs. Fair Isaac Stock Comparison
How do CrowdStrike (CRWD) and Fair Isaac (FICO) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
CrowdStrike (CRWD) and Fair Isaac (FICO) both belong to the Software industry, though CRWD is classified under Systems Software while FICO falls under Application Software.
| Profile Item | CRWD | FICO |
|---|---|---|
| Name | CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | Fair Isaac Corp. |
| Country/Region | United States | United States |
| GICS Sector | Information Technology | Information Technology |
| GICS Industry Group | Software & Services | Software & Services |
| GICS Industry | Software | Software |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Systems Software | Application Software |
| Market Capitalization | 222.09 billion USD | 15.22 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | Nasdaq | NYSE |
| Listing Date | June 12, 2019 | July 22, 1987 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | Common Stock |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CRWD | FICO |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | 66.51% | -58.54% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 67.65% | -9.17% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 25.12% | 12.31% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
| Metric | CRWD | FICO |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 57.45% | 63.29% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.18 | 1.33 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -67.69% | -75.13% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 9.95M | 759.34K |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CRWD | FICO |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | 1.08 | -0.99 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | 1.74 | -1.20 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Capital efficiency shows on one side only: CrowdStrike (CRWD) earns 1.46% on shareholders’ equity, ranked against its industry; Fair Isaac (FICO) has no ROE this period.
CRWD
Software & Services industry group
1.46%
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 17.90%
- Median
- 6.59%
- CRWD
- 1.46%
- Q1
- -9.59%
- Min
- -50.52%
FICO
Software & Services industry group
--
- Max
- 53.85%
- Q3
- 17.90%
- Median
- 6.59%
- Q1
- -9.59%
- Min
- -50.52%
- FICO
- --
Net Margin (TTM)
Fair Isaac (FICO) at 32.94% retains a top-quartile share of revenue as profit, ahead of CrowdStrike (CRWD) at 0.83%, which keeps about the industry-typical share.
CRWD
Software & Services industry group
0.83%
- Max
- 41.17%
- Q3
- 15.28%
- Median
- 4.63%
- CRWD
- 0.83%
- Q1
- -5.42%
- Min
- -33.17%
FICO
Software & Services industry group
32.94%
- Max
- 41.17%
- FICO
- 32.94%
- Q3
- 15.28%
- Median
- 4.63%
- Q1
- -5.42%
- Min
- -33.17%
Operating Margin (TTM)
CrowdStrike (CRWD) reports a negative operating margin of -2.26%, usually indicating that operating costs exceeded revenue at the operating-income line. Meanwhile Fair Isaac (FICO) reports 44.72%, ranking against industry peers normally.
CRWD
Software & Services industry group
-2.26%
- Max
- 46.89%
- Q3
- 17.64%
- Median
- 8.73%
- Q1
- -2.13%
- CRWD
- -2.26%
- Min
- -30.45%
FICO
Software & Services industry group
44.72%
- Max
- 46.89%
- FICO
- 44.72%
- Q3
- 17.64%
- Median
- 8.73%
- Q1
- -2.13%
- Min
- -30.45%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CRWD | FICO |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 1.46% | -- |
| ROA (TTM) | -0.78% | 40.99% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 0.83% | 32.94% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | -2.26% | 44.72% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 75.19% | 86.13% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Fair Isaac (FICO) at 27.33% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while CrowdStrike (CRWD) at 21.71% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for FICO.
EPS Growth
Only one side can be read here: Fair Isaac (FICO) reports EPS growth of 36.85%, ranked against its industry; CrowdStrike (CRWD) has no EPS growth figure this period.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CRWD | FICO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 21.71% | 27.33% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 29.01% | 18.76% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | -- | 36.85% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | -- | 28.97% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
CrowdStrike (CRWD) at 1.57 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Fair Isaac (FICO) at 0.99 runs in the tighter-liquidity quartile — a thinner cushion against current liabilities for FICO.
CRWD
Software & Services industry group
1.57
- Max
- 5.11
- Q3
- 2.77
- Median
- 1.67
- CRWD
- 1.57
- Q1
- 1.01
- Min
- 0.03
FICO
Software & Services industry group
0.99
- Max
- 5.11
- Q3
- 2.77
- Median
- 1.67
- Q1
- 1.01
- FICO
- 0.99
- Min
- 0.03
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Only one side’s leverage can be read here: CrowdStrike (CRWD) carries debt-to-equity ratio of 0.16 against its industry range, while Fair Isaac (FICO) reports no figure this period.
CRWD
Software & Services industry group
0.16
- Max
- 2.52
- Q3
- 1.13
- Median
- 0.40
- CRWD
- 0.16
- Q1
- 0.07
- Min
- 0.00
FICO
Software & Services industry group
--
- Max
- 2.52
- Q3
- 1.13
- Median
- 0.40
- Q1
- 0.07
- Min
- 0.00
- FICO
- --
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CRWD | FICO |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 1.57 | 0.99 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.16 | -- |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | -39.24 | 3.86 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Neither CrowdStrike (CRWD) nor Fair Isaac (FICO) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.
CRWD
Software & Services industry group
0.00%
- CRWD
- 0.00%
- Max
- 0.00%
- Q3
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
FICO
Software & Services industry group
0.00%
- FICO
- 0.00%
- Max
- 0.00%
- Q3
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Neither CrowdStrike (CRWD) nor Fair Isaac (FICO) pays a dividend this period — they may reinvest, use buybacks, or simply not return cash through dividends.
CRWD
Software & Services industry group
0.00%
- CRWD
- 0.00%
- Max
- 0.00%
- Q3
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
FICO
Software & Services industry group
0.00%
- FICO
- 0.00%
- Max
- 0.00%
- Q3
- 0.00%
- Median
- 0.00%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CRWD | FICO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Fair Isaac (FICO) at 19.40 is near its industry’s usual P/E ratio, while CrowdStrike (CRWD) at 3,615.00 sits above its peer range — an unusually expensive price for CRWD’s trailing earnings.
CRWD
Software & Services industry group
3,615.00
- CRWD
- 3,615.00
- Max
- 112.94
- Q3
- 60.32
- Median
- 32.91
- Q1
- 18.77
- Min
- 6.69
FICO
Software & Services industry group
19.40
- Max
- 112.94
- Q3
- 60.32
- Median
- 32.91
- FICO
- 19.40
- Q1
- 18.77
- Min
- 6.69
P/S Ratio (TTM)
Fair Isaac (FICO) at 6.00 prices around its industry’s typical P/S ratio, while CrowdStrike (CRWD) at 41.16 clears its benchmark range — CRWD looks notably rich on sales.
CRWD
Software & Services industry group
41.16
- CRWD
- 41.16
- Max
- 17.91
- Q3
- 8.78
- Median
- 4.25
- Q1
- 2.23
- Min
- 0.02
FICO
Software & Services industry group
6.00
- Max
- 17.91
- Q3
- 8.78
- FICO
- 6.00
- Median
- 4.25
- Q1
- 2.23
- Min
- 0.02
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Fair Isaac (FICO) reports a negative P/B ratio of -3.90, meaning negative book equity — the multiple itself is not meaningful for valuation. Meanwhile CrowdStrike (CRWD) reports 43.53, ranking against industry peers normally.
CRWD
Software & Services industry group
43.53
- CRWD
- 43.53
- Max
- 16.63
- Q3
- 8.50
- Median
- 4.30
- Q1
- 1.92
- Min
- -3.90
FICO
Software & Services industry group
-3.90
- Max
- 16.63
- Q3
- 8.50
- Median
- 4.30
- Q1
- 1.92
- FICO
- -3.90
- Min
- -3.90
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CRWD | FICO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 3,615.00 | 19.40 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 41.16 | 6.00 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 43.53 | -3.90 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 0.90% | 6.54% |