CRS vs. GFI: Carpenter vs. Gold Fields Stock Comparison
How do Carpenter (CRS) and Gold Fields (GFI) stack up? This page sets them side by side across company profile, performance and risk, profitability, growth, financial strength, dividends, and valuation, with selected fundamentals also measured against each stock's industry-group peers.
Company Profile
Carpenter (CRS) and Gold Fields (GFI) both belong to the Metals & Mining industry, though CRS is classified under Steel while GFI falls under Gold.
Carpenter (CRS) trades as ordinary local shares, while Gold Fields (GFI) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.
| Profile Item | CRS | GFI |
|---|---|---|
| Name | Carpenter Technology Corporation | Gold Fields Ltd. Sponsored ADR |
| Country/Region | United States | South Africa |
| GICS Sector | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry Group | Materials | Materials |
| GICS Industry | Metals & Mining | Metals & Mining |
| GICS Sub-Industry | Steel | Gold |
| Market Capitalization | 13.79 billion USD | 34.65 billion USD |
| Currency | USD | USD |
| Exchange | NYSE | NYSE |
| Listing Date | February 21, 1973 | March 17, 1980 |
| Security Type | Common Stock | ADR |
Price Performance
Cumulative Growth
Trailing Returns
Calendar-Year Returns
Performance Metrics
| Metric | CRS | GFI |
|---|---|---|
| Total Return (1Y) | -8.47% | 9.54% |
| Total Return (3Y, Annualized) | 66.22% | 51.07% |
| Total Return (5Y, Annualized) | 56.37% | 38.08% |
Risk Profile
Drawdown History
Return Distribution
Risk Metrics
Carpenter (CRS) has an aggressive beta of 1.39, indicating higher sensitivity to broad-market moves, while Gold Fields (GFI) is defensive at 0.64 and tends to be less market-sensitive — they sit on opposite ends of the beta spectrum.
| Metric | CRS | GFI |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility (1Y, Annualized) | 49.01% | 60.41% |
| Beta (5Y) | 1.39 | 0.64 |
| Max Drawdown (5Y) | -55.01% | -56.22% |
| Avg. Volume (3M) | 913.10K | 3.78M |
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Risk-Return Positioning
Risk-Adjusted Metrics
| Metric | CRS | GFI |
|---|---|---|
| Sharpe Ratio (1Y) | -0.26 | 0.09 |
| Sortino Ratio (1Y) | -0.36 | 0.12 |
Profitability
ROE (TTM)
Both companies show strong equity returns, but Gold Fields (GFI) at 58.68% is the standout with ROE above its industry range; Carpenter (CRS) at 27.84% also sits in the top quartile.
CRS
Materials industry group
27.84%
- Max
- 52.88%
- CRS
- 27.84%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
GFI
Materials industry group
58.68%
- GFI
- 58.68%
- Max
- 52.88%
- Q3
- 19.49%
- Median
- 8.76%
- Q1
- -3.41%
- Min
- -32.81%
Net Margin (TTM)
For every dollar of sales, both Carpenter (CRS) at 17.87% and Gold Fields (GFI) at 38.66% retain more as net profit than most peers, landing in the top net margin quartile of their industries.
CRS
Materials industry group
17.87%
- Max
- 38.66%
- CRS
- 17.87%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
GFI
Materials industry group
38.66%
- GFI
- 38.66%
- Max
- 38.66%
- Q3
- 15.98%
- Median
- 5.28%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- -20.40%
Operating Margin (TTM)
Gold Fields (GFI) at 55.00% operates in the top operating margin quartile, ahead of Carpenter (CRS) at 24.69%, which runs around its industry’s norm.
CRS
Materials industry group
24.69%
- Max
- 66.70%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- CRS
- 24.69%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
GFI
Materials industry group
55.00%
- Max
- 66.70%
- GFI
- 55.00%
- Q3
- 28.92%
- Median
- 12.56%
- Q1
- 3.28%
- Min
- -14.07%
Profitability Metrics
| Metric | CRS | GFI |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM) | 27.84% | 58.68% |
| ROA (TTM) | 12.96% | 28.52% |
| Net Margin (TTM) | 17.87% | 38.66% |
| Operating Margin (TTM) | 24.69% | 55.00% |
| Gross Margin (TTM) | 31.22% | 57.77% |
Growth
Revenue Growth
Gold Fields (GFI) at 68.24% sits in the top revenue growth quartile, while Carpenter (CRS) at 8.59% is closer to the peer norm — faster top-line expansion for GFI.
EPS Growth
Gold Fields (GFI) at 185.51% sits in the top EPS growth quartile, while Carpenter (CRS) at 41.78% is closer to the peer norm — faster per-share earnings growth for GFI.
Growth Metrics
| Metric | CRS | GFI |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue Growth (YoY) | 8.59% | 68.24% |
| Revenue Growth (3Y CAGR) | 7.00% | 26.86% |
| EPS Growth (YoY) | 41.78% | 185.51% |
| EPS Growth (3Y CAGR) | 109.75% | 71.58% |
Financial Strength
Current Ratio (MRQ)
Gold Fields (GFI) at 1.87 keeps current ratio within its industry’s typical mid-range, while Carpenter (CRS) at 3.94 sits above its industry’s typical mid-range — comfortable liquidity, though possibly with more idle current assets relative to peers.
CRS
Materials industry group
3.94
- Max
- 5.96
- CRS
- 3.94
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- Q1
- 1.45
- Min
- 0.16
GFI
Materials industry group
1.87
- Max
- 5.96
- Q3
- 3.30
- Median
- 2.24
- GFI
- 1.87
- Q1
- 1.45
- Min
- 0.16
Debt / Equity (MRQ)
Both Carpenter (CRS) at 0.32 and Gold Fields (GFI) at 0.29 fund their balance sheets with roughly industry-typical debt-to-equity mixes.
CRS
Materials industry group
0.32
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- CRS
- 0.32
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
GFI
Materials industry group
0.29
- Max
- 1.98
- Q3
- 0.89
- Median
- 0.47
- GFI
- 0.29
- Q1
- 0.13
- Min
- 0.00
Financial Strength Metrics
| Metric | CRS | GFI |
|---|---|---|
| Current Ratio (MRQ) | 3.94 | 1.87 |
| Debt / Equity (MRQ) | 0.32 | 0.29 |
| Net Debt / EBITDA | 0.62 | 0.06 |
Dividends
Dividend Yield (TTM)
Carpenter (CRS) at 0.29% pays an industry-typical yield; Gold Fields (GFI) at 5.65% is above its entire peer range — the higher number, but one that calls for a look at payout sustainability before treating it as an advantage.
CRS
Materials industry group
0.29%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- Median
- 0.38%
- CRS
- 0.29%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
GFI
Materials industry group
5.65%
- GFI
- 5.65%
- Max
- 4.52%
- Q3
- 1.85%
- Median
- 0.38%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)
Both Carpenter (CRS) at 7.05% and Gold Fields (GFI) at 31.81% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.
CRS
Materials industry group
7.05%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- Median
- 9.54%
- CRS
- 7.05%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
GFI
Materials industry group
31.81%
- Max
- 83.62%
- Q3
- 41.37%
- GFI
- 31.81%
- Median
- 9.54%
- Q1
- 0.00%
- Min
- 0.00%
Dividend Metrics
| Metric | CRS | GFI |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend Yield (TTM) | 0.29% | 5.65% |
| Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) | 7.05% | 31.81% |
Valuation
P/E Ratio (TTM)
Gold Fields (GFI) at 8.03 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Carpenter (CRS) at 24.54 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for GFI, though growth and earnings durability still matter.
CRS
Materials industry group
24.54
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- CRS
- 24.54
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- Min
- 3.93
GFI
Materials industry group
8.03
- Max
- 59.00
- Q3
- 32.93
- Median
- 18.82
- Q1
- 11.96
- GFI
- 8.03
- Min
- 3.93
P/S Ratio (TTM)
On P/S ratio, both Carpenter (CRS) at 4.32 and Gold Fields (GFI) at 3.05 are priced roughly in line with their industries — neither looks cheap nor rich on a sales basis.
CRS
Materials industry group
4.32
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- CRS
- 4.32
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
GFI
Materials industry group
3.05
- Max
- 9.62
- Q3
- 4.34
- GFI
- 3.05
- Median
- 1.87
- Q1
- 0.73
- Min
- 0.00
P/B Ratio (MRQ)
Both look rich against book: Carpenter (CRS) at 6.32 sits in the upper P/B ratio quartile, and Gold Fields (GFI) at 7.78 prices even higher, above its industry range.
CRS
Materials industry group
6.32
- Max
- 6.59
- CRS
- 6.32
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
GFI
Materials industry group
7.78
- GFI
- 7.78
- Max
- 6.59
- Q3
- 3.55
- Median
- 2.08
- Q1
- 1.26
- Min
- -0.17
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | CRS | GFI |
|---|---|---|
| P/E Ratio (TTM) | 24.54 | 8.03 |
| P/S Ratio (TTM) | 4.32 | 3.05 |
| P/B Ratio (MRQ) | 6.32 | 7.78 |
| Free Cash Flow Yield (TTM) | 1.54% | 12.05% |