Seek Returns logo

CRH vs. MT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CRH and MT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

CRH is a standard domestic stock, while MT trades as New York Registered Shares, providing U.S. investors with a way to invest in the foreign-based company.

SymbolCRHMT
Company NameCRH plcArcelorMittal S.A.
CountryIrelandLuxembourg
GICS SectorMaterialsMaterials
GICS IndustryConstruction MaterialsMetals & Mining
Market Capitalization76.39 billion USD25.84 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJuly 13, 1989August 7, 1997
Security TypeCommon StockNY Reg Shrs

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CRH and MT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CRH vs. MT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCRHMT
5-Day Price Return6.29%6.95%
13-Week Price Return15.11%2.07%
26-Week Price Return8.04%4.68%
52-Week Price Return38.77%41.71%
Month-to-Date Return19.07%4.07%
Year-to-Date Return22.84%27.69%
10-Day Avg. Volume5.42M1.88M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.74M1.94M
3-Month Volatility31.13%29.78%
Beta1.341.32

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CRH

15.20%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
24.78%
Q3
14.96%
Median
10.37%
Q1
4.14%
Min
-2.94%

In the upper quartile for the Construction Materials industry, CRH’s Return on Equity of 15.20% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

MT

4.80%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
31.09%
Q3
16.14%
Median
7.01%
Q1
1.15%
Min
-19.85%

MT’s Return on Equity of 4.80% is on par with the norm for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CRH vs. MT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Construction Materials and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CRH

9.09%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
28.01%
Q3
15.18%
Median
9.09%
Q1
3.32%
Min
-4.30%

CRH’s Net Profit Margin of 9.09% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Construction Materials industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

MT

4.11%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
40.97%
Q3
17.87%
Median
7.03%
Q1
1.82%
Min
-20.01%

MT’s Net Profit Margin of 4.11% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Metals & Mining industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

CRH vs. MT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction Materials and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CRH

13.88%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
31.67%
Q3
18.49%
Median
11.57%
Q1
7.82%
Min
-1.44%

CRH’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.88% is around the midpoint for the Construction Materials industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MT

6.59%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
59.48%
Q3
26.06%
Median
10.50%
Q1
2.89%
Min
-21.46%

MT’s Operating Profit Margin of 6.59% is around the midpoint for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

CRH vs. MT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Construction Materials and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCRHMT
Return on Equity (TTM)15.20%4.80%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.36%2.68%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)9.09%4.11%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)13.88%6.59%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)35.99%-81.21%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CRH

1.74

Construction Materials Industry

Max
5.14
Q3
2.89
Median
1.92
Q1
1.25
Min
0.79

CRH’s Current Ratio of 1.74 aligns with the median group of the Construction Materials industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MT

1.40

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
4.81
Q3
2.86
Median
1.94
Q1
1.45
Min
0.13

MT’s Current Ratio of 1.40 falls into the lower quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CRH vs. MT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction Materials and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CRH

0.71

Construction Materials Industry

Max
0.99
Q3
0.72
Median
0.55
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

CRH’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.71 is typical for the Construction Materials industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MT

0.25

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
1.11
Q3
0.52
Median
0.29
Q1
0.12
Min
0.00

MT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.25 is typical for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CRH vs. MT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction Materials and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CRH

11.05

Construction Materials Industry

Max
54.89
Q3
34.04
Median
7.92
Q1
4.28
Min
-6.24

CRH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.05 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Construction Materials industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MT

5.88

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
65.47
Q3
29.91
Median
5.88
Q1
0.91
Min
-26.49

MT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 5.88 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Metals & Mining industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CRH vs. MT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction Materials and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCRHMT
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.741.40
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.110.44
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.710.25
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)11.055.88

Growth

Revenue Growth

CRH vs. MT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CRH vs. MT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CRH

1.28%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
5.91%
Q3
4.64%
Median
2.57%
Q1
1.11%
Min
0.00%

CRH’s Dividend Yield of 1.28% is consistent with its peers in the Construction Materials industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MT

1.46%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
9.36%
Q3
3.78%
Median
1.41%
Q1
0.00%
Min
0.00%

MT’s Dividend Yield of 1.46% is consistent with its peers in the Metals & Mining industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CRH vs. MT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Construction Materials and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CRH

28.69%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
174.17%
Q3
91.80%
Median
44.42%
Q1
23.07%
Min
0.00%

CRH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 28.69% is within the typical range for the Construction Materials industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MT

11.71%

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
138.08%
Q3
63.28%
Median
38.78%
Q1
12.84%
Min
0.00%

MT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 11.71% is in the lower quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

CRH vs. MT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction Materials and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCRHMT
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.28%1.46%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)28.69%11.71%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CRH

23.07

Construction Materials Industry

Max
49.05
Q3
24.51
Median
12.09
Q1
7.70
Min
4.06

CRH’s P/E Ratio of 23.07 is within the middle range for the Construction Materials industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MT

11.06

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
57.44
Q3
32.87
Median
18.04
Q1
9.84
Min
0.00

MT’s P/E Ratio of 11.06 is within the middle range for the Metals & Mining industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

CRH vs. MT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction Materials and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CRH

2.10

Construction Materials Industry

Max
4.03
Q3
2.26
Median
1.31
Q1
0.66
Min
0.19

CRH’s P/S Ratio of 2.10 aligns with the market consensus for the Construction Materials industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MT

0.46

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
6.52
Q3
3.19
Median
1.97
Q1
0.59
Min
0.14

In the lower quartile for the Metals & Mining industry, MT’s P/S Ratio of 0.46 indicates its revenue is valued more conservatively than most of its peers. This could present a compelling opportunity if the market has overlooked its sales-generating capabilities.

CRH vs. MT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Construction Materials and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CRH

2.77

Construction Materials Industry

Max
3.19
Q3
1.80
Median
1.08
Q1
0.72
Min
0.11

CRH’s P/B Ratio of 2.77 is in the upper tier for the Construction Materials industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

MT

0.49

Metals & Mining Industry

Max
3.92
Q3
2.15
Median
1.40
Q1
0.84
Min
0.25

MT’s P/B Ratio of 0.49 is in the lower quartile for the Metals & Mining industry. From a value investing perspective, this is favorable, as it suggests the stock is trading at a discount to its net asset value and may offer a greater margin of safety.

CRH vs. MT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Construction Materials and Metals & Mining industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCRHMT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)23.0711.06
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.100.46
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.770.49
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)21.8412.56