Seek Returns logo

CRH vs. MLM: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CRH and MLM, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCRHMLM
Company NameCRH plcMartin Marietta Materials, Inc.
CountryIrelandUnited States
GICS SectorMaterialsMaterials
GICS IndustryConstruction MaterialsConstruction Materials
Market Capitalization76.39 billion USD37.39 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateJuly 13, 1989February 17, 1994
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CRH and MLM by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CRH vs. MLM: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCRHMLM
5-Day Price Return6.29%3.30%
13-Week Price Return15.11%12.12%
26-Week Price Return8.04%13.68%
52-Week Price Return38.77%18.09%
Month-to-Date Return19.07%7.86%
Year-to-Date Return22.84%20.05%
10-Day Avg. Volume5.42M0.54M
3-Month Avg. Volume4.74M0.44M
3-Month Volatility31.13%21.85%
Beta1.341.03

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CRH

15.20%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
24.78%
Q3
14.96%
Median
10.37%
Q1
4.14%
Min
-2.94%

In the upper quartile for the Construction Materials industry, CRH’s Return on Equity of 15.20% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

MLM

11.88%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
24.78%
Q3
14.96%
Median
10.37%
Q1
4.14%
Min
-2.94%

MLM’s Return on Equity of 11.88% is on par with the norm for the Construction Materials industry, indicating its profitability relative to shareholder equity is typical for the sector.

CRH vs. MLM: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against the Construction Materials industry benchmark.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CRH

9.09%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
28.01%
Q3
15.18%
Median
9.09%
Q1
3.32%
Min
-4.30%

CRH’s Net Profit Margin of 9.09% is aligned with the median group of its peers in the Construction Materials industry. This indicates its ability to convert revenue into profit is typical for the sector.

MLM

16.47%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
28.01%
Q3
15.18%
Median
9.09%
Q1
3.32%
Min
-4.30%

A Net Profit Margin of 16.47% places MLM in the upper quartile for the Construction Materials industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CRH vs. MLM: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against the Construction Materials industry benchmark.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CRH

13.88%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
31.67%
Q3
18.49%
Median
11.57%
Q1
7.82%
Min
-1.44%

CRH’s Operating Profit Margin of 13.88% is around the midpoint for the Construction Materials industry, indicating that its efficiency in managing core business operations is typical for the sector.

MLM

23.04%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
31.67%
Q3
18.49%
Median
11.57%
Q1
7.82%
Min
-1.44%

An Operating Profit Margin of 23.04% places MLM in the upper quartile for the Construction Materials industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CRH vs. MLM: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against the Construction Materials industry benchmark.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCRHMLM
Return on Equity (TTM)15.20%11.88%
Return on Assets (TTM)6.36%6.25%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)9.09%16.47%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)13.88%23.04%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)35.99%29.44%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CRH

1.74

Construction Materials Industry

Max
5.14
Q3
2.89
Median
1.92
Q1
1.25
Min
0.79

CRH’s Current Ratio of 1.74 aligns with the median group of the Construction Materials industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

MLM

2.35

Construction Materials Industry

Max
5.14
Q3
2.89
Median
1.92
Q1
1.25
Min
0.79

MLM’s Current Ratio of 2.35 aligns with the median group of the Construction Materials industry, indicating that its short-term liquidity is in line with its sector peers.

CRH vs. MLM: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against the Construction Materials industry benchmark.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CRH

0.71

Construction Materials Industry

Max
0.99
Q3
0.72
Median
0.55
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

CRH’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.71 is typical for the Construction Materials industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

MLM

0.58

Construction Materials Industry

Max
0.99
Q3
0.72
Median
0.55
Q1
0.30
Min
0.00

MLM’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.58 is typical for the Construction Materials industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CRH vs. MLM: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against the Construction Materials industry benchmark.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CRH

11.05

Construction Materials Industry

Max
54.89
Q3
34.04
Median
7.92
Q1
4.28
Min
-6.24

CRH’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 11.05 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Construction Materials industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

MLM

16.36

Construction Materials Industry

Max
54.89
Q3
34.04
Median
7.92
Q1
4.28
Min
-6.24

MLM’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 16.36 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Construction Materials industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CRH vs. MLM: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against the Construction Materials industry benchmark.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCRHMLM
Current Ratio (MRQ)1.742.35
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.111.21
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.710.58
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)11.0516.36

Growth

Revenue Growth

CRH vs. MLM: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CRH vs. MLM: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CRH

1.28%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
5.91%
Q3
4.64%
Median
2.57%
Q1
1.11%
Min
0.00%

CRH’s Dividend Yield of 1.28% is consistent with its peers in the Construction Materials industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

MLM

0.52%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
5.91%
Q3
4.64%
Median
2.57%
Q1
1.11%
Min
0.00%

MLM’s Dividend Yield of 0.52% is in the lower quartile for the Construction Materials industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

CRH vs. MLM: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against the Construction Materials industry benchmark.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CRH

28.69%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
174.17%
Q3
91.80%
Median
44.42%
Q1
23.07%
Min
0.00%

CRH’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 28.69% is within the typical range for the Construction Materials industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

MLM

17.62%

Construction Materials Industry

Max
174.17%
Q3
91.80%
Median
44.42%
Q1
23.07%
Min
0.00%

MLM’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 17.62% is in the lower quartile for the Construction Materials industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

CRH vs. MLM: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against the Construction Materials industry benchmark.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCRHMLM
Dividend Yield (TTM)1.28%0.52%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)28.69%17.62%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CRH

23.07

Construction Materials Industry

Max
49.05
Q3
24.51
Median
12.09
Q1
7.70
Min
4.06

CRH’s P/E Ratio of 23.07 is within the middle range for the Construction Materials industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

MLM

33.80

Construction Materials Industry

Max
49.05
Q3
24.51
Median
12.09
Q1
7.70
Min
4.06

A P/E Ratio of 33.80 places MLM in the upper quartile for the Construction Materials industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

CRH vs. MLM: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against the Construction Materials industry benchmark.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CRH

2.10

Construction Materials Industry

Max
4.03
Q3
2.26
Median
1.31
Q1
0.66
Min
0.19

CRH’s P/S Ratio of 2.10 aligns with the market consensus for the Construction Materials industry. This suggests its valuation, based on sales, is seen as standard and is on par with its competitors.

MLM

5.57

Construction Materials Industry

Max
4.03
Q3
2.26
Median
1.31
Q1
0.66
Min
0.19

With a P/S Ratio of 5.57, MLM trades at a valuation that eclipses even the highest in the Construction Materials industry. This implies the market has priced in exceptionally optimistic scenarios for future revenue growth, posing considerable valuation risk.

CRH vs. MLM: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against the Construction Materials industry benchmark.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CRH

2.77

Construction Materials Industry

Max
3.19
Q3
1.80
Median
1.08
Q1
0.72
Min
0.11

CRH’s P/B Ratio of 2.77 is in the upper tier for the Construction Materials industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

MLM

3.53

Construction Materials Industry

Max
3.19
Q3
1.80
Median
1.08
Q1
0.72
Min
0.11

At 3.53, MLM’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Construction Materials industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CRH vs. MLM: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against the Construction Materials industry benchmark.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCRHMLM
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)23.0733.80
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)2.105.57
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)2.773.53
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)21.8438.05