CRBG vs. NMR: Corebridge Financial vs. Nomura Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Corebridge Financial (CRBG) and Nomura (NMR) both fall under the Financial Services industry group, but CRBG is classified in Financial Services while NMR is classified in Capital Markets.

Nomura (NMR) has more than two decades of public-market history since December 17, 2001, whereas Corebridge Financial (CRBG) listed on September 16, 2022 and has a much shorter record to draw on.

Corebridge Financial (CRBG) trades as ordinary local shares, while Nomura (NMR) trades as an ADR — compare with FX exposure, depositary-program fees, and dividend-withholding-tax differences in mind.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Both Corebridge Financial (CRBG) at 20.08% and Nomura (NMR) at 11.51% land near their industries’ usual ROE ranges, so capital efficiency looks broadly in line with peers on both sides.

Both Corebridge Financial (CRBG) at 10.76% and Nomura (NMR) at 17.12% keep about the typical share of revenue as profit for their industries — neither bottom line stands out from peers.

Both Corebridge Financial (CRBG) at 39.53% and Nomura (NMR) at 24.36% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Nomura (NMR) at 10.80% is around its peer norm for revenue growth, while Corebridge Financial (CRBG) at -5.07% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker demand or pricing momentum.

Nomura (NMR) at 7.17% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Corebridge Financial (CRBG) at -118.28% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Corebridge Financial (CRBG) in Financial Services and Nomura (NMR) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Corebridge Financial (CRBG) in Financial Services and Nomura (NMR) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Corebridge Financial (CRBG) at 2.89% pays an industry-typical yield; Nomura (NMR) at 620.40% is above its entire peer range — the higher number, but one that calls for a look at payout sustainability before treating it as an advantage.

Both Corebridge Financial (CRBG) at 22.20% and Nomura (NMR) at 16.85% keep payout ratio within their industries’ typical mid-ranges — dividend policies that share earnings without consuming too much of them.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Corebridge Financial (CRBG) at 7.64 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Nomura (NMR) at 10.83 is closer to its industry’s usual earnings multiple — a discount for CRBG, though growth and earnings durability still matter.

Both Corebridge Financial (CRBG) at 0.73 and Nomura (NMR) at 0.01 fetch a relatively low price per dollar of sales, landing in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile of their industries.

On P/B ratio, both Corebridge Financial (CRBG) at 2.41 and Nomura (NMR) at 1.15 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

Valuation Metrics