CRBG vs. GPN: Corebridge Financial vs. Global Payments Stock Comparison

Company Profile

Corebridge Financial (CRBG) and Global Payments (GPN) both belong to the Financial Services industry, though CRBG is classified under Diversified Financial Services while GPN falls under Transaction & Payment Processing Services.

Global Payments (GPN) has more than two decades of public-market history since January 16, 2001, whereas Corebridge Financial (CRBG) listed on September 16, 2022 and has a much shorter record to draw on.

Price Performance

Cumulative Growth

Trailing Returns

Calendar-Year Returns

Performance Metrics

Risk Profile

Drawdown History

Return Distribution

Risk Metrics

Risk-Adjusted Performance

Risk-Return Positioning

Risk-Adjusted Metrics

Profitability

Corebridge Financial (CRBG) at 20.08% is around its peer norm for ROE, while Global Payments (GPN) at 0.84% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker returns on shareholders’ equity.

Global Payments (GPN) reports a negative net margin of -11.21%, usually indicating a net loss over the period. Meanwhile Corebridge Financial (CRBG) reports 10.76%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Both Corebridge Financial (CRBG) at 39.53% and Global Payments (GPN) at 15.73% run core operations about as efficiently as their industries’ norm — neither stands out on operating profitability.

Profitability Metrics

Growth

Both Corebridge Financial (CRBG) at -5.07% and Global Payments (GPN) at -0.39% post bottom-quartile revenue growth versus peers, pointing to weaker demand or pricing momentum than typical rivals.

Global Payments (GPN) at -6.17% is around its peer norm for EPS growth, while Corebridge Financial (CRBG) at -118.28% drops into the bottom quartile, signaling weaker earnings momentum.

Growth Metrics

Financial Strength

current ratio doesn’t apply on either side: Corebridge Financial (CRBG) in Financial Services and Global Payments (GPN) in Financial Services both report balance sheets without a current/non-current split, so their short-term liquidity is better judged through regulatory and funding measures.

debt-to-equity ratio is set aside for both: Corebridge Financial (CRBG) in Financial Services and Global Payments (GPN) in Financial Services run businesses where balance-sheet leverage is part of the model, so capital-adequacy and funding measures are the better gauges of balance-sheet risk.

Financial Strength Metrics

Dividends

Both Corebridge Financial (CRBG) at 2.89% and Global Payments (GPN) at 1.05% pay solid, industry-typical yields, sitting squarely within their peers’ usual range.

Global Payments (GPN) reports payout ratio above 100% at 178.57%, meaning dividends exceeded current-period earnings and sustainability needs extra context. Meanwhile Corebridge Financial (CRBG) reports 22.20%, ranking against industry peers normally.

Dividend Metrics

Valuation

Corebridge Financial (CRBG) at 7.64 sits in the cheaper P/E ratio quartile, while Global Payments (GPN) at 173.93 trades above its peer range — a wide earnings-valuation gap relative to industry peers.

Corebridge Financial (CRBG) at 0.73 sits in the cheaper P/S ratio quartile while Global Payments (GPN) at 2.24 prices around its industry’s middle — CRBG costs less per dollar of sales, though read it alongside growth and margins.

On P/B ratio, both Corebridge Financial (CRBG) at 2.41 and Global Payments (GPN) at 1.11 are valued close to their industries’ norm against book — neither stands out from peers.

Valuation Metrics