Seek Returns logo

CR vs. TT: A Head-to-Head Stock Comparison

Updated on

Here’s a clear look at CR and TT, comparing key factors like historical performance, profitability, financial strength, growth, dividend, and valuation.

Company Profile

SymbolCRTT
Company NameCrane CompanyTrane Technologies plc
CountryUnited StatesIreland
GICS SectorIndustrialsIndustrials
GICS IndustryMachineryBuilding Products
Market Capitalization10.42 billion USD94.66 billion USD
ExchangeNYSENYSE
Listing DateMarch 29, 2023March 17, 1980
Security TypeCommon StockCommon Stock

Historical Performance

This chart compares the performance of CR and TT by tracking the growth of an initial $10,000 investment in each. Use the tabs to select the desired time period. Data is adjusted for dividends and splits.

CR vs. TT: Growth of a $10,000 investment over the past one year.

Historical Performance at a Glance

SymbolCRTT
5-Day Price Return2.88%4.42%
13-Week Price Return-3.03%-3.53%
26-Week Price Return17.99%19.85%
52-Week Price Return16.99%9.90%
Month-to-Date Return-0.63%1.53%
Year-to-Date Return21.34%14.24%
10-Day Avg. Volume0.30M1.39M
3-Month Avg. Volume0.30M1.27M
3-Month Volatility21.69%25.48%
Beta1.261.17

Profitability

Return on Equity (TTM)

CR

20.52%

Machinery Industry

Max
33.68%
Q3
20.05%
Median
12.37%
Q1
8.67%
Min
-7.69%

In the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, CR’s Return on Equity of 20.52% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

TT

37.61%

Building Products Industry

Max
46.90%
Q3
27.60%
Median
15.43%
Q1
8.94%
Min
0.77%

In the upper quartile for the Building Products industry, TT’s Return on Equity of 37.61% signals a highly effective use of shareholder capital to drive profitability compared to most of its peers.

CR vs. TT: A comparison of their Return on Equity (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Net Profit Margin (TTM)

CR

15.46%

Machinery Industry

Max
19.72%
Q3
11.07%
Median
7.62%
Q1
5.05%
Min
-1.52%

A Net Profit Margin of 15.46% places CR in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

TT

13.76%

Building Products Industry

Max
19.42%
Q3
13.74%
Median
8.72%
Q1
4.81%
Min
0.46%

A Net Profit Margin of 13.76% places TT in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry, signifying strong profitability and more effective cost management than most of its peers.

CR vs. TT: A comparison of their Net Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Operating Profit Margin (TTM)

CR

16.42%

Machinery Industry

Max
26.63%
Q3
15.99%
Median
11.27%
Q1
7.72%
Min
-0.51%

An Operating Profit Margin of 16.42% places CR in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

TT

18.39%

Building Products Industry

Max
26.72%
Q3
17.70%
Median
12.14%
Q1
9.54%
Min
1.65%

An Operating Profit Margin of 18.39% places TT in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry. This signals a strong ability to translate revenue into operating profit, outperforming most of its competitors in core business efficiency.

CR vs. TT: A comparison of their Operating Profit Margin (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Profitability at a Glance

SymbolCRTT
Return on Equity (TTM)20.52%37.61%
Return on Assets (TTM)13.49%13.90%
Net Profit Margin (TTM)15.46%13.76%
Operating Profit Margin (TTM)16.42%18.39%
Gross Profit Margin (TTM)39.69%36.26%

Financial Strength

Current Ratio (MRQ)

CR

2.93

Machinery Industry

Max
3.13
Q3
2.12
Median
1.72
Q1
1.34
Min
0.77

CR’s Current Ratio of 2.93 is in the upper quartile for the Machinery industry. This signifies a strong liquidity position, suggesting the company is well-equipped to cover its immediate liabilities compared to its peers.

TT

1.10

Building Products Industry

Max
3.10
Q3
2.06
Median
1.60
Q1
1.30
Min
0.88

TT’s Current Ratio of 1.10 falls into the lower quartile for the Building Products industry. This indicates a tighter liquidity situation and a more constrained capacity to handle short-term debt than many of its competitors.

CR vs. TT: A comparison of their Current Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)

CR

0.03

Machinery Industry

Max
1.56
Q3
0.79
Median
0.44
Q1
0.27
Min
0.00

Falling into the lower quartile for the Machinery industry, CR’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.03 points to a conservative financing strategy. This results in lower financial risk but potentially limits strategic investments compared to more leveraged competitors.

TT

0.59

Building Products Industry

Max
1.64
Q3
1.02
Median
0.62
Q1
0.20
Min
0.00

TT’s Debt-to-Equity Ratio of 0.59 is typical for the Building Products industry, indicating its use of leverage is in line with the sector norm. This suggests a balanced approach to its capital structure.

CR vs. TT: A comparison of their Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)

CR

16.60

Machinery Industry

Max
81.58
Q3
37.68
Median
13.76
Q1
7.97
Min
-1.43

CR’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 16.60 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Machinery industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

TT

15.31

Building Products Industry

Max
72.12
Q3
34.39
Median
23.97
Q1
7.29
Min
2.97

TT’s Interest Coverage Ratio of 15.31 is positioned comfortably within the norm for the Building Products industry, indicating a standard and healthy capacity to cover its interest payments.

CR vs. TT: A comparison of their Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Financial Strength at a Glance

SymbolCRTT
Current Ratio (MRQ)2.931.10
Quick Ratio (MRQ)1.980.76
Debt-to-Equity Ratio (MRQ)0.030.59
Interest Coverage Ratio (TTM)16.6015.31

Growth

Revenue Growth

CR vs. TT: A side-by-side comparison of their Revenue Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

EPS Growth

CR vs. TT: A side-by-side comparison of their EPS Growth for the MRQ (YoY), TTM (YoY), 3-Year CAGR, and 5-Year CAGR periods.

Dividend

Dividend Yield (TTM)

CR

0.48%

Machinery Industry

Max
4.55%
Q3
2.66%
Median
1.90%
Q1
1.23%
Min
0.00%

CR’s Dividend Yield of 0.48% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests the company’s strategy likely favors retaining earnings for growth over providing a high dividend income.

TT

0.84%

Building Products Industry

Max
2.51%
Q3
1.92%
Median
1.30%
Q1
0.78%
Min
0.00%

TT’s Dividend Yield of 0.84% is consistent with its peers in the Building Products industry, providing a dividend return that is standard for its sector.

CR vs. TT: A comparison of their Dividend Yield (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)

CR

14.18%

Machinery Industry

Max
198.34%
Q3
101.42%
Median
62.79%
Q1
29.85%
Min
0.00%

CR’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 14.18% is in the lower quartile for the Machinery industry. This suggests a conservative dividend policy, with a strategic focus on reinvesting profits for future growth.

TT

27.94%

Building Products Industry

Max
157.36%
Q3
76.90%
Median
30.70%
Q1
17.97%
Min
0.00%

TT’s Dividend Payout Ratio of 27.94% is within the typical range for the Building Products industry, suggesting a balanced approach between shareholder payouts and company reinvestment.

CR vs. TT: A comparison of their Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Dividend at a Glance

SymbolCRTT
Dividend Yield (TTM)0.48%0.84%
Dividend Payout Ratio (TTM)14.18%27.94%

Valuation

Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)

CR

29.61

Machinery Industry

Max
47.95
Q3
30.11
Median
22.35
Q1
16.56
Min
6.48

CR’s P/E Ratio of 29.61 is within the middle range for the Machinery industry. This suggests its valuation is in line with the sector average, representing neither a significant premium nor a discount compared to its peers.

TT

33.14

Building Products Industry

Max
45.60
Q3
30.36
Median
21.97
Q1
17.37
Min
12.44

A P/E Ratio of 33.14 places TT in the upper quartile for the Building Products industry. This high valuation relative to peers suggests the market holds elevated expectations for the company’s future growth.

CR vs. TT: A comparison of their Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)

CR

4.58

Machinery Industry

Max
4.97
Q3
2.76
Median
1.65
Q1
1.04
Min
0.04

CR’s P/S Ratio of 4.58 is in the upper echelon for the Machinery industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

TT

4.56

Building Products Industry

Max
5.90
Q3
3.09
Median
1.72
Q1
1.07
Min
0.37

TT’s P/S Ratio of 4.56 is in the upper echelon for the Building Products industry. This means the company is valued richly on its revenue stream compared to its peers, suggesting the stock is priced for a high level of future performance.

CR vs. TT: A comparison of their Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM) against their respective Machinery and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)

CR

5.79

Machinery Industry

Max
7.29
Q3
4.06
Median
2.67
Q1
1.54
Min
0.52

CR’s P/B Ratio of 5.79 is in the upper tier for the Machinery industry. This indicates that investors are paying a premium relative to the company’s net assets, a valuation that hinges on its ability to generate superior profits.

TT

12.45

Building Products Industry

Max
10.99
Q3
5.69
Median
2.98
Q1
1.80
Min
0.66

At 12.45, TT’s P/B Ratio is at an extreme premium to the Building Products industry. This signifies that the market’s valuation is heavily reliant on future potential rather than its current net asset value, which can be a high-risk proposition.

CR vs. TT: A comparison of their Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ) against their respective Machinery and Building Products industry benchmarks.

Valuation at a Glance

SymbolCRTT
Price-to-Earnings Ratio (TTM)29.6133.14
Price-to-Sales Ratio (TTM)4.584.56
Price-to-Book Ratio (MRQ)5.7912.45
Price-to-Free Cash Flow Ratio (TTM)29.2433.67